Menu
Loop through advisor profiles in knowledge/board/ and return a combined multi-persona critique of a spec, draft, or decision.
Install with Codex or Claude Copy this prompt, paste it into Codex, Claude, or another assistant, and let it review the skill page and install it for you.
Evaluates agent output adversarially before committing — prevents self-assessment bias
Writes a structured session handoff so a fresh agent can continue without losing thread
Turn a plain-English vision or task into a verified, build-ready spec before any code. Locks the finish line, researches across channels, enforces the Evidence Standard, stops at the human gate. Adopted from CleanExpo/Fabel-Prompt-Engineer for the Authority-Site / Pi-CEO / Unite-Group build process.
Turn a plain-English vision into a verified, build-ready spec. Locks the finish line, researches across channels, enforces the Evidence Standard, and stops at the human approval gate.
Capture the user's feedback about an output and update the relevant skill or knowledge files so future outputs get sharper.
File new articles, transcripts, and notes into knowledge/ in the right place with source metadata and an evidence tag.
| name | ask-the-board |
| description | Loop through advisor profiles in knowledge/board/ and return a combined multi-persona critique of a spec, draft, or decision. |
Input: a spec, draft, or decision to critique. Output: one combined critique
built from every advisor in knowledge/board/.
knowledge/board/. If none have a
profile.md, stop and tell the user the board is empty (board content
arrives in Phase 3 via ingest) — do not improvise personas from thin air.profile.md plus any ingested source material, then
write a critique in that advisor's lens: what they'd push on, what
they'd cut, what they'd bet on. 3–6 bullets each. Ground every point in
their ingested material where possible and cite the file.[INFERENCE] — persona synthesis, not fact.