Skip to main content
Run any Skill in Manus
with one click
GitHub repository

skills

skills contains 22 collected skills from cniska, with repository-level occupation coverage and site-owned skill detail pages.

skills collected
22
Stars
4
updated
2026-07-23
Forks
0
Occupation coverage
3 occupation categories · 100% classified
repository explorer

Skills in this repository

agents-md
software-developers

Create and update AGENTS.md project rules. Use when authoring or amending the cross-tool conventions agents must follow.

2026-07-23
handoff
software-developers

Write forward-looking startup instructions for the next session, then reset context to save costs. Use when the context is getting long or before switching focus.

2026-07-23
ship
software-developers

Run pre-release checks, pick the version bump, and cut the release. Use when ready to tag and release.

2026-07-23
spec
software-developers

Create and maintain a specification that states what to build, not how. Use when writing a spec, editing requirements, or defining acceptance criteria.

2026-07-23
review
software-quality-assurance-analysts-and-testers

Run all review dimensions against a diff or a path. Use when reviewing a feature branch before merge, reviewing someone else's PR, or auditing a file path.

2026-07-21
docs
software-developers

Create or update project documentation. Use when creating architecture docs, runtime docs, reference docs, or design documents that explain what the system does.

2026-07-19
architecture-review
software-developers

Review architecture, boundaries, and design consistency. Use when reviewing module boundaries, extension seams, or contract drift.

2026-07-10
build
software-developers

Implement features incrementally through vertical slices. Use when building features, adding functionality, or implementing tasks that touch multiple files.

2026-07-10
correctness-review
software-developers

Review whether changed logic does what it claims — bugs, edge cases, broken contracts. Use when reviewing a diff for correctness, not just style or structure.

2026-07-10
debug
software-developers

Debug systematically with structured triage. Use when tests fail, builds break, or runtime behavior doesn't match expectations.

2026-07-10
deprecation
software-developers

Deprecate and remove code safely. Use when replacing systems, removing unused features, or consolidating duplicate implementations.

2026-07-10
design
software-developers

Design stable interfaces that are hard to misuse. Use when defining contracts, module boundaries, or public APIs.

2026-07-10
doc-review
software-developers

Review docs for drift, missing updates, and terminology changes. Use when code changes should be reflected in documentation.

2026-07-10
git
software-developers

Manage commits, branches, and change history. Use when committing, branching, or managing version control.

2026-07-10
issue
software-developers

Create a GitHub issue from a short description. Use when filing a bug, feature request, or task.

2026-07-10
plan
software-developers

Design a feature or behavior change through dialogue. Use when asked to plan, scope, design, or break down work before coding.

2026-07-10
pr
software-developers

Create a pull request with review and verify. Use when the branch is ready to merge.

2026-07-10
security-review
information-security-analysts

Review security risks, trust boundaries, and unsafe defaults — concrete attack paths only. Use when reviewing security posture or assessing risk before release.

2026-07-10
simplify
software-developers

Simplify code by reducing complexity while preserving exact behavior. Use after a feature is working, during review when complexity is flagged, or when encountering unclear code.

2026-07-10
style-review
software-developers

Review code style, naming, patterns, and consistency. Use when reviewing code quality or style drift.

2026-07-10
tdd
software-developers

Drive implementation with red-green-refactor. Use when building features or fixing bugs test-first.

2026-07-10
test-review
software-quality-assurance-analysts-and-testers

Review test adequacy for changed code — meaningful gaps, quality problems, and unnecessary tests. Use when reviewing whether changed code has adequate tests.

2026-07-10