| name | memory-design |
| description | Design memory for an LLM agent — what to keep, where to keep it, and when memory hurts more than it helps. Use when the user is adding memory to an agent and mentions short-term memory, long-term memory, episodic, semantic, conversation history, summary memory, vector memory, memory store, mem0, Letta, MemGPT, or asks "should this agent remember?" / "why is the agent recalling the wrong thing?". |
| tags | ["memory","architecture","context-engineering","production"] |
Memory Design
Memory is the most over-built and under-designed part of an agent.
The default question is "what should the agent remember?" The better question is "what must the agent forget so the next turn works?" Memory that doesn't earn its place poisons recall, inflates cost, and produces confidently wrong answers.
When to use this skill
- The user is adding "memory" to a chatbot, copilot, or task agent.
- The user reports the agent recalling stale, wrong, or irrelevant facts.
- The user is choosing between full-history, summary, vector store, or a memory framework (mem0, Letta, MemGPT, Zep).
- The user is conflating "context window" with "memory" — they are not the same.
The four memory types
Distinguish before designing. Mixing them is the root cause of most "memory bugs".
- Working — current turn's context. Lives in the prompt. Cleared at end of request.
- Episodic — what happened in this session / thread. Indexed by time; recalled by recency or relevance.
- Semantic — durable facts about the user, project, world. Indexed by entity; recalled by lookup.
- Procedural — how to do things (skills, tool-use patterns, workflows). Indexed by task type; recalled by trigger.
Each has a different write rule, retention policy, and recall mechanism. If your design has one memory store, you have a bug waiting.
Decision flow
Walk this before adding any memory.
- Does the task need information beyond the current turn? → no? Use no memory. Stateless wins on debuggability.
- Is the information lifecycle bounded by the session? → episodic only. Don't persist past session end.
- Is the information a stable fact about the user or world? → semantic. Write through a typed entity store, not a vector dump.
- Is the information a learned pattern of how to act? → procedural. This is a skill or prompt update, not a memory write.
- Does recall ever return contradictory items? → memory needs conflict resolution, not more recall.
- Can the agent operate correctly if memory is empty? → yes? Memory is an enhancement. No? You've designed a brittle dependency.
Write rules
- Write at episode boundaries, not turn boundaries. Per-turn writes flood the store with low-signal noise.
- Summarise before writing semantic memory. Raw conversation chunks make the worst long-term store.
- Type every memory.
{kind: 'preference', entity: 'user', key: 'tone', value: 'terse'} beats a free-text blob.
- Set a TTL. No memory is forever. Preferences last months; project state lasts weeks; session state lasts hours.
- Idempotency on write. "User prefers terse responses" should not appear 40 times in semantic memory.
Recall rules
- Filter before ranking. Entity match, then time window, then relevance. Vector-only recall returns nostalgia.
- Recall budget per turn. ≤5 episodic items, ≤10 semantic items. More is noise.
- Show provenance. Every recalled item carries
(source, written_at, confidence). The agent reasons about staleness.
- Conflict resolution is part of recall. When two facts contradict, latest-write wins by default; surface the conflict for high-stakes decisions.
- Negative recall matters. "I checked and found nothing about X" is a valid result. Silent empty recall is a bug.
Anti-patterns to flag immediately
- One vector store as "the memory". Different memory types have different shapes; one store flattens them and ruins recall.
- Dumping conversation history into RAG. You get the worst of both: stale chunks, no entity grounding, retrieval drift.
- Writing every turn. Signal-to-noise collapses; old facts get buried under restatements.
- Recalling without filtering by user/session. Cross-tenant leakage; cross-session confusion.
- No forgetting. Memory grows; recall degrades; cost climbs. TTL is not optional.
- Memory framework as architecture. "We use mem0" is not a memory design; it's a vendor choice.
- Confusing context window with memory. Stuffing the prompt is not memory — it's expensive amnesia.
Questions to ask the user
- What decision does memory enable that's impossible without it? If you can't name one, you don't need memory.
- Which memory type is each piece — working, episodic, semantic, procedural?
- What's the write trigger — every turn, end of session, explicit save, agent-initiated?
- What's the recall budget per turn — count and tokens?
- What's the TTL per memory type?
- How does the agent detect and resolve contradictory memories?
- What's the eval for memory — does loading it improve task success, or just inflate latency?
The hard line
If memory makes the agent slower or wronger on a held-out task, delete the memory. Memory is a load-bearing feature; treat it like one. Default to no memory until evidence forces it.
Why this exists
Most agent "memory" deployments are vector-store retrieval pipelines re-skinned as memory. They retrieve confidently wrong items, contaminate recall, and degrade with use. Designing for the four memory types separately — with explicit write rules, recall budgets, and TTLs — converts memory from a liability into a feature.
References
references/types.md — working / episodic / semantic / procedural — what each looks like in storage.references/write-and-recall.md — patterns for write triggers, recall filters, and conflict resolution.references/frameworks.md — mem0, Letta, MemGPT, Zep — what each does well, where each leaks.
Related skills
- Memory is not the same as retrieval — [[rag-vs-context-engineering]].
- Memory contents end up in the prompt — [[context-window-hygiene]].
- Memory writes/reads are spans in the trace — [[agent-observability]].
- Memory shape is set by the architecture — [[agent-architecture-patterns]].
- Memory load is part of cost per task — [[agent-cost-modeling]].
