design-debt-tracker

name	design-debt-tracker
description	Use when critique or review produces deferred findings, when checking accumulated design compromises, or when deciding what to address in the next iteration. Maintains a living register of design debt — the minor issues, future-iteration notes, and conscious compromises that accumulate across a project

Design Debt Tracker

Design debt is every conscious compromise the team makes and every minor issue deferred to "next time." Like technical debt, it compounds. Unlike technical debt, most teams don't track it — so it disappears into the gap between what was shipped and what was intended.

This skill maintains a living register that captures debt as it's created, tracks it across iterations, and surfaces it when decisions are being made.

Why This Exists

The design-critic classifies findings as Critical, Major, Minor, and Note. Critical and Major get fixed. Minor and Note get a shrug and "fix if time allows." They rarely get fixed because no one remembers them.

The accessibility-reviewer does the same — Minor issues with specific fixes that never happen because they're buried in a report that no one reopens.

Every "fix if time allows" is a promise to a persona. This skill makes those promises visible.

When to Use

• After critique — when the design-critic produces Minor or Note findings that won't be fixed this round
• After accessibility review — when the accessibility-reviewer flags Minor issues that are deferred
• After a fix round — when not all issues were addressed and some were consciously deferred
• At project start — to review accumulated debt from previous iterations
• Before planning — to decide which debt items to address in the next cycle
• On user request — "show me the design debt" or "what did we defer?"

The Register

Design debt lives in a ## Design Debt Register section in design-state.md. One register per project. It persists across iterations.

Register Format

## Design Debt Register

_Items: [count] | Critical: [count] | Oldest: [date]_

| ID | Date | Source | Severity | What | Who is affected | Suggested fix | Status | Notes |
|----|------|--------|----------|------|----------------|---------------|--------|-------|
| DD-001 | 2025-01-15 | design-critic | Minor | Settings form shows all fields at once — cognitive load | Persona: Jamie (cognitive disability) | Progressive disclosure with sections | Open | Deferred from v1 — setup is one-time flow |
| DD-002 | 2025-01-15 | accessibility-reviewer | Minor | Category colour strips lack icon backup | Users with colour vision deficiency | Add icon per category alongside colour | Open | |
| DD-003 | 2025-01-16 | design-critic | Note | Empty state illustration is placeholder | All users | Commission illustration that matches brand | Open | Low priority — functional without it |
| DD-004 | 2025-01-15 | accessibility-reviewer | Minor | Toast notifications auto-dismiss before screen reader finishes | Screen reader users | Extend timeout to 8s or add persistent log | Resolved | Fixed in v1.1 |

Field Definitions

Field	What goes here
ID	Sequential identifier (DD-001, DD-002, ...). Never reuse IDs
Date	When the debt was recorded
Source	Which agent or review identified it (design-critic, accessibility-reviewer, design-lead, user, etc.)
Severity	The original severity classification: Minor or Note (Critical and Major should be fixed, not deferred)
What	Specific description of the issue — not "needs improvement" but "form shows 12 fields at once"
Who is affected	Which personas or user groups bear the cost of this debt. Be specific
Suggested fix	Actionable recommendation from the original review
Status	Open, Resolved, Accepted, or Escalated
Notes	Why it was deferred, context, related items

Status Definitions

Status	Meaning
Open	Identified, not yet addressed. This is a promise to come back
Resolved	Fixed in a subsequent iteration. Record which iteration
Accepted	Consciously decided this is not worth fixing. Requires user approval and a rationale
Escalated	Was Minor, but accumulated evidence or changing context makes it Major. Needs attention

Process

Step 1: Capture Debt (After Review)

When the design-critic or accessibility-reviewer completes a review:

1. Read their findings
2. Identify all Minor and Note severity items that will NOT be fixed in this round
3. For each deferred item, create a register entry with all fields populated
4. Append to the Design Debt Register in design-state.md
5. Update the summary line (item count, critical count, oldest date)

Do not capture items that are being fixed. The register tracks debt, not the fix list. If it's getting fixed now, it doesn't belong here.

Step 2: Review Debt (At Project Start or Before Planning)

When starting a new iteration or planning cycle:

1. Read the current Design Debt Register
2. Check for escalation triggers (see below)
3. Present a debt summary to the user:

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
  DESIGN DEBT SUMMARY
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

  Open items: [count]
  By severity: [X] Minor, [Y] Note
  Oldest unresolved: [date] ([age])

  ACCESSIBILITY DEBT:
  • [count] items affecting users with disabilities
  • Most affected: [persona or user group]

  TOP CANDIDATES FOR THIS CYCLE:
  1. [DD-XXX] [description] — [why now]
  2. [DD-XXX] [description] — [why now]
  3. [DD-XXX] [description] — [why now]

  ESCALATED (was Minor, now needs attention):
  • [DD-XXX] [description] — [escalation reason]

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

4. Ask the user which items to include in the current cycle's plan
5. Items the user selects get added to the design plan as tasks

Step 3: Escalation Check

Debt items should be escalated from Minor to Major when:

Trigger	Example
Age	Item has been Open for 3+ iterations without resolution
Accumulation	Multiple debt items affect the same persona or the same screen
Context change	A new persona or use case makes the issue more impactful
User complaint	The user or stakeholder mentions the issue independently
Compound effect	Two Minor items together create a Major experience gap

When escalating:

1. Change Status to "Escalated"
2. Add a note explaining why
3. Flag it in the debt summary
4. Present it to the user as needing attention

Step 4: Resolve Debt

When a debt item is fixed:

1. Update Status to "Resolved"
2. Add a note: "Fixed in [iteration/date] by [agent]"
3. Add the resolution to the Decisions Log in design-state.md
4. Do NOT delete the row — resolved items are history

Step 5: Accept Debt

When the user consciously decides an item is not worth fixing:

1. Confirm with the user: "This affects [personas]. Are you sure you want to accept this?"
2. Update Status to "Accepted"
3. Add the user's rationale in Notes
4. Add the acceptance to the Decisions Log

Accessibility debt requires explicit acknowledgement. If a debt item affects users with disabilities, the user must explicitly accept the trade-off. Do not silently accept accessibility debt.

Integration

• Receives from: designpowers-critique (Minor/Note findings), accessibility-reviewer (Minor findings), verification-before-shipping (deferred items)
• Feeds into: writing-design-plans (debt items become plan tasks), design-retrospective (debt trends are retrospective data)
• Updates: design-state.md (Design Debt Register section)
• Called by: using-designpowers (after reviews, at project start, on user request)

Anti-Patterns

Pattern	Why It Fails
Capturing Critical issues as debt	Critical issues block access. They get fixed now, not tracked for later
Deferring the same item 3+ times	That's not debt management, that's avoidance. Escalate it
Accepting accessibility debt without user acknowledgement	Accessibility compromises affect real people. The user decides, not the system
Deleting resolved items	Resolved items are history. They show the team addresses its promises
Not reviewing debt at project start	Starting a new iteration without checking old promises means those promises are broken
Tracking everything	Not every observation needs tracking. Notes that are genuinely informational ("consider X someday") can stay in the critique report. Debt is for specific, actionable items that affect specific people