Menu
Produce a decision-closed ai-sdd feature plan with a verifiable acceptance checklist, grounded in this repo's conventions and the frozen contracts.
Install with Codex or Claude Copy this prompt, paste it into Codex, Claude, or another assistant, and let it review the skill page and install it for you.
Based on SOC occupation classification
Update the ai-sdd framework binary + skills to the latest release — an apply-on-confirm wrapper that runs `ai-sdd update --check`, surfaces the current-to-latest version transition, and (only on explicit confirmation) runs `ai-sdd update` and lands a standalone reseed commit. Agent-agnostic (claude-code or codex). Use when a teammate wants to update / upgrade ai-sdd, sees the update-available notice, or invokes `/ai-sdd-update`.
Stand up (or refresh) an ai-sdd factory for a repository so any coding agent — claude-code, codex, … — can drive it. Discovers the repo's conventions, scaffolds the .ai-sdd/ home, authors worker skills + schemas, compiles the deterministic gates, and wires provider-neutral skill surfacing (AGENTS.md + per-agent symlinks). Use when onboarding a repo to ai-sdd or re-bootstrapping after the codebase/conventions drift.
Drive a software-factory run by dispatching a sub-agent per worker — the deterministic `ai-sdd` engine plans (next), a fresh sub-agent does each worker's work via its skill, the engine gates and advances (submit), and each completed slice is committed. Agent-agnostic (claude-code or codex). Use when asked to run, drive, continue, or advance a factory run / pipeline / orchestration, or when the user mentions `ai-sdd next` / `ai-sdd submit`.
Print the diagram-driven ai-sdd workflow cheatsheet — the canonical command sequence (bootstrap → plan → run, validate/next/submit/status) that travels with the binary. Use when a user forgets which command comes next, asks "how do I drive a run / what's the workflow", or needs the command reference without leaving the repo.
Turn a complete PROGRAM brief into a runnable master plan — a decision-closed program requirements doc and a master orchestration graph whose nodes are whole sub-features (kind:pipeline) sequenced by milestone validation gates with owners. The program tier above ai-sdd-plan. Requires a real program brief (refuses a one-liner) and human approval of the program requirements draft before emitting the graph. Use when planning a multi-feature, multi-person project in a bootstrapped repo (run ai-sdd-bootstrap first); each sub-feature is then planned with ai-sdd-plan. Re-run on an existing program to amend it in place (create-vs-amend is auto-detected from disk): append sub-features/milestones and rewire pending nodes; a started node (completed or in-flight) is immutable and corrected forward with a downstream `<node>-revert` node.
Turn a complete feature brief into a runnable plan for a bootstrapped repo — a decision-closed requirements doc and an orchestration graph (slices + depends_on) the engine executes. Requires a real brief (refuses a bare one-liner — asks for one) and human approval of the requirements draft before generating slices. The planning layer between an idea and ai-sdd-run. Use when starting a new feature in a repo that already has a .ai-sdd/ (run ai-sdd-bootstrap first). Re-run on an existing feature to amend it in place (create-vs-amend is auto-detected from disk): append slices and rewire pending ones; a started slice (completed or in-flight) is immutable and corrected forward with a downstream `<slice>-revert` slice.
| name | plan-feature |
| description | Produce a decision-closed ai-sdd feature plan with a verifiable acceptance checklist, grounded in this repo's conventions and the frozen contracts. |
Read first, before planning:
MASTER_REQUIREMENTS.md — the decision-closed authoritative source (where PLAN.md/
ARCHITECTURE.md disagree, it wins)..ai-sdd/conventions/<stack>.md for this slice's vertical (stack is supplied by the slice
node: contracts | operator | coprocessor | brain)..ai-sdd/schemas/{task-telemetry,self-model,parts-catalog}.schema.yaml.Write the artifact to .ai-sdd/artifacts/feature-plan.v1.yaml. It must contain:
summary: concise description of the intended change.scope: a mapping with at least in and out lists.acceptance: one verifiable item per outcome, each { id, description } with a stable id. This
checklist is the thread — the implementer records the ids it covers in satisfies, the reviewer
returns a verdict per id.decisions: every planning decision, each status: closed. Cite the MASTER_REQUIREMENTS section
or ADR that grounds it.files: exact repo-relative files/prefixes the implementation may touch — must stay within the
slice's vertical root (contracts/ | operator/ | coprocessor/ | brain/) plus shared
surfaces (tests/, docs/, Makefile, pyproject.toml, .ai-sdd/, …).tests: the gate commands the implementer must run — at minimum uv sync, make test,
make validate, make lint (per the Verification & Reviewer Runbook).Honor the boundary rules from the convention file:
contracts — other verticals import the frozen schemas.TelemetrySource/VisionSource adapter interfaces, never a concrete
provider.parts_catalog.json + prior gap
residuals — never the oracle's hidden parameters.Do not leave open architecture questions inside the artifact. If the work needs a new architecture
decision not closed in MASTER_REQUIREMENTS.md, stop and surface the options to the maintainer
instead of guessing. make demo is an m2-milestone concern — do not add it as a per-slice gate.