Run any Skill in Manus with one click

lisa-analyze-claude-remote

Stars1

Forks0

UpdatedJune 8, 2026 at 14:11

Audit whether this repository can run as a Claude Code remote routine (cloud session) and inventory everything Lisa AND the host project must install or configure in the cloud environment — CLIs/binaries, environment variables/secrets, startup hooks, MCP scope/auth, and the user-scoped config and auto-memory gaps that don't replicate remotely. Read-only; emits grouped findings plus a machine-readable inventory.

Installation

Install with Codex or Claude Copy this prompt, paste it into Codex, Claude, or another assistant, and let it review the skill page and install it for you.

Run Skill in Manus

Source

CodySwannGT

CodySwannGT/advisory-rankings

View GitHub Repository View Creator Repositories

Download

Run Skill in Manus

Related occupationsSOC

Based on SOC occupation classification

Software DevelopersComputer and Mathematical Occupations·SOC 15-1252

SKILL.md

readonly

name

lisa-analyze-claude-remote

description

Lisa Command Compatibility

Original Claude command: /lisa:analyze-claude-remote
OpenCode invocation: $lisa-analyze-claude-remote or a plain-English request that matches this skill.
Treat the user's surrounding request as the command arguments.
Claude argument hint: [--section=<name>] [--json]

Use the /lisa:analyze-claude-remote skill to audit this repository's readiness to run as a Claude Code remote routine and inventory what the cloud environment must install and configure. Use the user's surrounding request as this command's arguments.

More from this repository

same repository

exploratory-qa

CodySwannGT/advisory-rankings

First-time-user exploratory QA walkthrough for web apps that FEEDS THE LIFECYCLE. Use when asked to experience an app the way a brand-new human user would — opening it in a real browser or browser automation session, landing cold on the home page, and clicking/typing/selecting through visible controls to find anything confusing, broken, or hard to understand (unclear purpose or audience, human-facing jargon, contextless extracted data, machine-style labels, raw dates/enums, sparse data with no explanation, wrong control semantics, slow or unclear loads, late meaningful content, cramped or cut-off UI, inconsistent/non-standard UX, awkward scroll behavior, unclear affordances, dead-end flows that strand a user — e.g. a login page with no way to register or recover a password, or a primary action that drops the user into an incomplete/unsatisfiable state with no way to finish) across all breakpoints. Static route scans, HTTP fetches, screenshots alone, or console/network checks alone are not sufficient explorato

2026-06-201

github-build-intake

CodySwannGT/advisory-rankings

GitHub counterpart to lisa:jira-build-intake. Scans a GitHub repository for issues carrying the configured `ready` build label, processes the first eligible issue, runs leaf work via lisa:github-agent, relabels to the configured `done` label on completion, then exits. Enforces the claim-time arm of the `leaf-only-lifecycle` rule: a parent/container with open child work (or a childless Epic) that still carries a stale build-ready label is moved out of the ready pickup queue into the configured `claimed` label with a lifecycle-repair comment, never dispatched to lisa:github-agent. The `ready` label is the human-flipped signal that an issue is truly ready for direct development pickup — mirroring how Notion PRDs work product Draft → Ready → (us) In Review → Blocked|Ticketed.

2026-06-201

implement

CodySwannGT/advisory-rankings

This skill should be used for any non-trivial request — features, bugs, stories, epics, spikes, or multi-step tasks. It accepts a ticket URL (Jira, Linear, GitHub), a file path containing a spec, or a plain-text prompt. It assembles an agent team, breaks the work into structured tasks, and manages the full lifecycle from research through implementation, code review, deploy, and empirical verification.

2026-06-201

intake

CodySwannGT/advisory-rankings

Vendor-agnostic scanner for Ready queues. Given a Notion PRD database URL → finds the first Ready PRD and runs lisa:plan. Given a Confluence space or parent page URL → finds the first prd-ready PRD and runs lisa:plan. Given a Linear workspace URL or team key → finds the first prd-ready Linear project and runs lisa:plan. Given a GitHub repo URL or `org/repo` token → finds the first prd-ready GitHub issue and runs lisa:plan. Given a JIRA project key or JQL filter → finds the first Ready ticket and runs lisa:implement. Given a GitHub repo URL or `org/repo` token when `tracker = github` → finds the first `status:ready` issue and runs lisa:implement. On the PRD side it also closes the loop: each cycle rolls a ticketed PRD up to shipped and dispatches lisa:verify-prd for one shipped PRD (shipped → verified on pass; on fail, re-opened shipped → ticketed with build-ready fix tickets that auto-build and re-verify — never blocked). Designed as the cron target for /schedule — one eligible item per invocation, exits clea

2026-06-201

jira-build-intake

CodySwannGT/advisory-rankings

Symmetric counterpart to notion-prd-intake on the JIRA side. Scans a JIRA project (or JQL filter) for tickets in the configured `ready` status, claims the first eligible ticket by transitioning to the configured `claimed` status, runs the implementation/build flow via jira-agent, transitions to the configured `done` status on completion, then exits. Enforces the claim-time arm of the `leaf-only-lifecycle` rule: a parent/container with open child work (or a childless Epic) that still carries a stale build-ready status is skipped or safe-blocked with a lifecycle-repair comment, never claimed. The `ready` status is the human-flipped signal that a TODO ticket is truly ready for development — mirroring how Notion PRDs work product Draft → Ready → (us) In Review → Blocked|Ticketed.

2026-06-201

jira-evidence

CodySwannGT/advisory-rankings

Upload evidence to GitHub pr-assets release, update PR description, upload attachments to JIRA, post comment, and move ticket to the configured review status only when `jira.workflow.review` is set (otherwise leave it in `claimed`). Reusable by any skill that captures evidence and generates evidence/comment.txt + evidence/comment.md.

2026-06-201

name

lisa-analyze-claude-remote

description

Lisa Command Compatibility

Original Claude command: /lisa:analyze-claude-remote
OpenCode invocation: $lisa-analyze-claude-remote or a plain-English request that matches this skill.
Treat the user's surrounding request as the command arguments.
Claude argument hint: [--section=<name>] [--json]