object-oriented-programming-paradigm

name

object-oriented-programming-paradigm

description

Explains and applies the object-oriented programming paradigm — classes, the four pillars (encapsulation, abstraction, inheritance, polymorphism), object relationships, SOLID, and design qualities — with idiomatic code examples in Python, C++, Java, C#, JavaScript, PHP, and Swift. Use when users ask about OOP concepts or SOLID principles, when they need help modeling a domain with classes and interfaces, when reviewing or refactoring class hierarchies, or when they want an OOP concept example in a specific language.

Object-Oriented Programming Paradigm

Ground OOP answers in the reference files bundled with this skill instead of improvising definitions. Each concept has a reference file explaining it and a folder of runnable examples in popular languages.

When to Use

• The user names a concept directly ("show me encapsulation in Swift", "what is the Liskov substitution principle?")
• The user describes a design problem that maps to a concept ("my subclass breaks when passed to code written for the base class")
• The user asks to compare concepts ("composition vs inheritance?", "coupling vs cohesion?")
• The user wants existing code reviewed or refactored against OOP principles (god classes, deep hierarchies, leaky abstractions, train-wreck call chains)

Workflow

1. Identify the concept(s) from the user's question using the catalog below.
2. Read the reference file at references/<concept>.md for the explanation, applicability, trade-offs, and related concepts.
3. Read the language example at examples/<concept>/<concept>.<ext> when the user works in (or asks for) a specific language. Adapt it to their domain rather than pasting the generic example verbatim.
4. Answer with: what the concept means, when it applies (and when it doesn't), and code adapted to the user's context.

If the user's problem does not call for object orientation, say so — plain functions and data structures are often simpler than a class model.

Concept Catalog

Building Blocks

The vocabulary of object-oriented code: what classes, objects, and contracts are.

Concept	Intent	Reference
Classes & Objects	Bundle state and behavior into a blueprint; instantiate independent objects from it	references/classes-and-objects.md
Interfaces & Abstract Classes	Separate a contract from its implementations; share partial implementation safely	references/interfaces-and-abstract-classes.md

The Four Pillars

The defining properties of the paradigm.

Concept	Intent	Reference
Encapsulation	Hide internal state behind a controlled interface that preserves invariants	references/encapsulation.md
Abstraction	Expose a component's essential model while hiding operational detail	references/abstraction.md
Inheritance	Derive specialized classes from a base, reusing and extending its behavior	references/inheritance.md
Polymorphism	Let one call site work across many concrete types (subtype, parametric, ad hoc)	references/polymorphism.md

Object Relationships

How objects reference, own, and assemble each other.

Concept	Intent	Reference
Object Relationships	Distinguish association, aggregation, and composition by ownership and lifetime	references/object-relationships.md
Composition over Inheritance	Build behavior by assembling parts instead of extending deep hierarchies	references/composition-over-inheritance.md

SOLID Principles

Five principles for class design that keep change local.

Principle	Intent	Reference
Single Responsibility	Give each class one reason to change	references/single-responsibility.md
Open/Closed	Make code open for extension without modifying what already works	references/open-closed.md
Liskov Substitution	Ensure subtypes are usable anywhere their base type is expected	references/liskov-substitution.md
Interface Segregation	Prefer many small client-specific interfaces over one fat interface	references/interface-segregation.md
Dependency Inversion	Make high-level policy depend on abstractions, not concrete implementations	references/dependency-inversion.md

Design Qualities

Cross-cutting qualities used to judge an object-oriented design.

Concept	Intent	Reference
Coupling & Cohesion	Minimize dependence between modules and maximize relatedness within them	references/coupling-and-cohesion.md
Law of Demeter	Talk only to immediate collaborators instead of reaching through object graphs	references/law-of-demeter.md

Examples

Each concept has a folder examples/<concept>/ with self-contained, runnable examples named <concept>.<ext>:

Language	File	Notes
Python	<concept>.py
C++	<concept>.cpp
Java	<concept>.java
C#	<concept>.cs
JavaScript	<concept>.js
PHP	<concept>.php
Swift	<concept>.swift

Examples are limited to languages with first-class classes (or class-like syntax). Languages without classes — C, Go, Rust — are omitted; their reference files still note how each concept maps idiomatically when a user asks.

A language file may be absent when a concept does not translate meaningfully to that language; the concept's reference file notes such gaps (e.g. Swift structs and protocols as an alternative to deep class inheritance).

Answering Guidelines

• Prefer the language's idiomatic form over a textbook Java-style class diagram (e.g. protocols and duck typing in Python, structs and protocols in Swift, closures where a one-method class would be ceremony).
• Mention trade-offs and simpler alternatives, not just the mechanics — not every problem needs a class.
• When comparing concepts, read both reference files and contrast intent, not structure.
• Do not present deep inheritance hierarchies as the default way to reuse code; prefer composition and interfaces unless true subtype specialization exists.
• When reviewing code, name the violated principle and show the minimal refactor, not a full rewrite.