openspec-propose

name	openspec-propose
description	Propose a new change with all artifacts generated in one step. Use when the user wants to quickly describe what they want to build and get a complete proposal with design, specs, and tasks ready for implementation.
license	MIT
compatibility	Requires openspec CLI.
metadata	{"author":"openspec","version":"1.0","generatedBy":"1.2.0-cpyu.9"}

Propose a new change - create the change and generate all artifacts in one step.

I'll create a change with artifacts:

• proposal.md (what & why)
• design.md (how)
• tasks.md (implementation steps)
• opsx-delta.yaml (project OPSX delta, generated after specs are clear)

When ready to implement, run /opsx:apply

---

Input: The user's request should include a change name (kebab-case) OR a description of what they want to build.

Steps

1. If no clear input provided, ask what they want to build

   Use the AskUserQuestion tool (open-ended, no preset options) to ask:

   "What change do you want to work on? Describe what you want to build or fix."

   From their description, derive a kebab-case name (e.g., "add user authentication" → add-user-auth).

   IMPORTANT: Do NOT proceed without understanding what the user wants to build.

2. Create the change directory

   openspec new change "<name>"
   

   This creates a scaffolded change at openspec/changes/<name>/ with .openspec.yaml.

3. Get the artifact build order

   openspec status --change "<name>" --json
   

   Parse the JSON to get:

   • applyRequires: array of artifact IDs needed before implementation (e.g., ["tasks"])
   • artifacts: list of all artifacts with their status and dependencies

Before reading other context files, check whether openspec/project.opsx.yaml exists.

• If it exists, read it first for domains → capabilities structure
• Check openspec/project.opsx.code-map.yaml for code location references
• Check openspec/specs/ for behavior documentation
• Treat it as navigation context, not as a replacement for change artifacts

4. Create artifacts in sequence until apply-ready

   Use the TodoWrite tool to track progress through the artifacts.

   Loop through artifacts in dependency order (artifacts with no pending dependencies first):

   a. For each artifact that is ready (dependencies satisfied):

   • Get instructions:

     openspec instructions <artifact-id> --change "<name>" --json
     

   • The instructions JSON includes:
     • context: Project background (constraints for you - do NOT include in output)
     • rules: Artifact-specific rules (constraints for you - do NOT include in output)
     • template: The structure to use for your output file
     • instruction: Schema-specific guidance for this artifact type
     • outputPath: Where to write the artifact
     • dependencies: Completed artifacts to read for context
   • Read any completed dependency files for context
   • Create the artifact file using template as the structure
   • Apply context and rules as constraints - but do NOT copy them into the file
   • Show brief progress: "Created "

   b. Continue until all applyRequires artifacts are complete

   • After creating each artifact, re-run openspec status --change "<name>" --json
   • Check if every artifact ID in applyRequires has status: "done" in the artifacts array
   • Stop when all applyRequires artifacts are done

   c. If an artifact requires user input (unclear context):

   • Use AskUserQuestion tool to clarify
   • Then continue with creation

   d. After the specs artifact is complete in a spec-driven change, generate opsx-delta.yaml Generate opsx-delta.yaml:

• Read openspec instructions opsx-delta --change "<name>" --json
• Use the returned template, instruction, and outputPath to generate opsx-delta.yaml
• Read proposal.md to extract the capability list
• Read all delta specs in openspec/changes/<name>/specs/*/spec.md
• Read openspec/project.opsx.yaml if it exists for current-system context
• Treat ADDED, MODIFIED, and REMOVED as YAML object keys, not Markdown headings
• Follow a concrete YAML object structure such as:

  schema_version: 1
  ADDED:
    capabilities:
      - id: cap.example.feature
        type: capability
        intent: Describe the new capability
    relations:
      - from: cap.example.feature
        type: contains
        to: dom.example
  MODIFIED:
    capabilities:
      - id: cap.example.existing
        intent: Updated intent text
  REMOVED:
    capabilities:
      - id: cap.example.legacy
  

• Delta nodes contain only id, type, intent, status — no code_refs or spec_refs
• Keep this agent-driven: capture merge intent in the YAML, not in programmatic code

5. Run post-propose validation before the final summary

   Run post-propose warning validation:

• This validation is warning-only. Do NOT turn /opsx:propose into a blocking gate.
• Validate generated change specs against the same contract used by downstream change delta validation:
  • Prefer openspec validate "<name>" --type change --json when available
  • Align with Validator.validateChangeDeltaSpecs() semantics for delta sections, SHALL/MUST requirement text, and required #### Scenario: blocks
• Validate opsx-delta.yaml through the same programmatic CLI path used by downstream change validation:
  • Prefer openspec validate "<name>" --type change --json when available
  • Align with Validator.validateOpsxDelta() semantics for Zod parsing, dry-run applyOpsxDelta(), referential integrity, and code-map integrity
  • Do NOT run openspec sync for this check because it mutates project files
  • If openspec/project.opsx.yaml does not exist, Validator.validateOpsxDelta() skips this check and the final summary must report the skip
• Run lightweight structure checks for proposal.md, design.md, and tasks.md against the current schema templates, not scattered examples:
  • Read openspec instructions proposal --change "<name>" --json, openspec instructions design --change "<name>" --json, and openspec instructions tasks --change "<name>" --json
  • Check only key required headings and checkbox structure
  • For tasks.md, run a deterministic Actions/Checks structure check equivalent to validateTaskStructure in src/core/parsers/task-structure.ts
  • Programmatically verify Actions and Checks sections, A-prefixed action checkboxes, C-prefixed check checkboxes, required Covers: fields, valid Covers: references, every action covered by at least one check, required non-empty Verifies: fields, change-local Verifies: spec paths plus Requirement/Scenario references when local change specs exist, and at least one Command:, Evidence:, or Expect: field on every check
  • Do NOT invent semantic lint rules beyond the current templates
  • Do NOT judge whether a check is semantically sufficient; defer semantic suitability to verify/reviewer
• If warnings are found, do exactly one repair pass on the generated artifacts, then re-check once
• Final summary MUST separate:
  • fixed warnings
  • remaining warnings
  • skipped checks
• Even with remaining warnings, you MAY still declare the change ready for /opsx:apply, but disclose the residual issues explicitly

6. Show final status

   openspec status --change "<name>"
   

Output

After completing all artifacts, summarize:

• Change name and location
• List of artifacts created with brief descriptions
• Validation summary with fixed warnings, remaining warnings, and skipped checks
• What's ready: "All artifacts created! Ready for implementation."
• Prompt: "Run /opsx:apply or ask me to implement to start working on the tasks."

Artifact Creation Guidelines

• Follow the instruction field from openspec instructions for each artifact type
• The schema defines what each artifact should contain - follow it
• Read dependency artifacts for context before creating new ones
• Use template as the structure for your output file - fill in its sections

Document Language Contract:

• Treat openspec/config.yaml as the compact source of truth, but consume its compiled prompt projection rather than reinterpreting raw keys ad hoc

• If the compiled projection includes docLanguage, apply it only to natural-language prose you write in the artifact body

• Follow the existing template structure exactly; do not invent a different layout because the prose language changes

• Keep template headings, IDs, schema keys, relation types, BDD keywords, file paths, commands, and code identifiers in their canonical form

• If no docLanguage projection is present, keep the default writing behavior for prose

• IMPORTANT: context and rules are constraints for YOU, not content for the file

  • Do NOT copy <context>, <rules>, <project_context> blocks into the artifact
  • These guide what you write, but should never appear in the output

Guardrails

• Create ALL artifacts needed for implementation (as defined by schema's apply.requires)
• Always read dependency artifacts before creating a new one
• If context is critically unclear, ask the user - but prefer making reasonable decisions to keep momentum
• If a change with that name already exists, ask if user wants to continue it or create a new one
• Verify each artifact file exists after writing before proceeding to next