Menu
Launch both thermo-nuclear review subagents in parallel. Use for thermos, double thermo review, or combined bug/security and code-quality branch audits.
Install with Codex or Claude Copy this prompt, paste it into Codex, Claude, or another assistant, and let it review the skill page and install it for you.
Based on SOC occupation classification
Route delegated work through the current host's supported sub-agent mechanism. In Pi, use the installed pi-subagents package. Use whenever the user asks for a subagent, Pi agent, Claude or Codex agent, or independent multi-agent work.
Run the CodeRabbit CLI for AI-powered review. Use only when the user explicitly asks for CodeRabbit or invokes coderabbit-review. Never trigger for a generic code review, PR review, quality check, security audit, or autonomously.
Use when reviewing implementation plans, migration plans, refactoring proposals, feature plans, generated implementation trackers, or committable phase plans before execution; especially when asked whether a plan is ready, concrete enough, testable, safe, or dependency-aware.
Use when creating, refining, or reviewing implementation plans, migration plans, refactoring proposals, feature plans, implementation trackers, or committable phase plans; especially when turning a rough plan into executable phases or checking whether a plan is concrete, testable, safe, dependency-aware, and suitable for parallel work.
Use this skill whenever the user gives a YouTube URL and asks to summarize, digest, analyze, extract transcript/context, decide whether a video is worth watching, or understand what a video is about. Prefer the summarize CLI for YouTube/video context instead of web search. Use Codex as the default summarize backend when possible, and use the local Whisper large-v3 model for transcription fallback. Do not use this for ordinary web pages; the user prefers Exa for webpage research.
Run an extremely strict maintainability review for abstraction quality, giant files, and spaghetti-condition growth. Use for a thermo-nuclear code quality review, thermonuclear review, deep code quality audit, or especially harsh maintainability review.
| name | thermos |
| description | Launch both thermo-nuclear review subagents in parallel. Use for thermos, double thermo review, or combined bug/security and code-quality branch audits. |
| disable-model-invocation | true |
Run the two thermo review passes as Pi background sub-agents in parallel.
subagent call with async: true and context: "fresh":
thermo-nuclear-review-subagent for bugs, breakages, security, devex regressions, feature-flag leaks, and other branch-audit risks.thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review-subagent for maintainability, structure, file-size growth, spaghetti, abstractions, and codebase-health risks./subagents-fleet or subagent({ action: "status" }), and stop it with /subagents-stop.Do not run the reviews yourself in the main session. If the user later asks for a synthesis after the background reviews finish, summarize only the visible results, deduplicate overlapping findings, and keep the highest-signal issues first.