code-review

name	code-review
description	Review a PR diff with focused, actionable feedback

Use this template to review a PR diff with focused, actionable feedback.

INPUTS

• PR diff - the pull request diff to review
• (optional) PR description
• (optional) Ticket links

INSTRUCTIONS

1. Scan the PR diff for correctness, style, security, and performance.
2. Ground comments in the project context (frameworks, languages, databases, messaging systems).
3. Prefer specific inline suggestions with minimal working patches.
4. Flag test gaps and missing docs. Propose concrete test cases.
5. Label severity: Blocker, Major, Minor, Nit.
6. Keep lines <= 80 chars.

OUTPUT FORMAT

Summary

• Scope:
• Impact:
• Risk level:

Positives

• Code quality wins:
• Good patterns:
• Tests/documentation:

Issues by Severity

Blockers

• [file:line] Problem -> Why it matters -> Fix suggestion

  // patchlet
  

Major

• ...

Minor

• ...

Nits

• ...

Security & Compliance

• Authentication/authorization:
• Input validation/injection prevention:
• Secrets/logging/sensitive data:
• Third-party integrations:
• Data privacy/compliance:

Performance

• Hot paths:
• Database query optimization:
• Caching/TTL:
• Async/concurrency handling:

Testing Gaps

• Unit:
• Integration/e2e:
• Property/fuzz:
• Load/reliability:

Documentation

• Changelog:
• Architecture notes:
• README/code comments:

Inline Review

• [file path]
• line X: comment
• line Y: comment

Review Checklist

• Builds/CI green
• Lint/format pass
• Tests updated/added
• Backward compatible
• Feature flagged
• Observability added