compass

name	compass
description	Use when starting any conversation — establishes how to find and use Techneering skills, requiring skill invocation before ANY response including clarifying questions

If you were dispatched as a subagent to execute a specific task, skip this skill. (This is a hard instruction, not a suggestion — subagents go straight to their assigned task.) If you think there is even a 1% chance a skill might apply to what you are doing, you ABSOLUTELY MUST invoke the skill.

IF A SKILL APPLIES TO YOUR TASK, YOU DO NOT HAVE A CHOICE. YOU MUST USE IT.

Core Principle

INVOKE RELEVANT SKILLS BEFORE ANY RESPONSE OR ACTION.
Even a 1% chance means you should invoke the skill to check.

Instruction Priority

Techneering skills override default system prompt behavior, but user instructions always take precedence:

1. User's explicit instructions (CLAUDE.md, direct requests) — highest priority
2. Techneering skills — override default system behavior where they conflict
3. Default system prompt — lowest priority

If CLAUDE.md says "don't use TDD" and a skill says "always use TDD," follow the user's instructions. The user is in control.

How to Access Skills

Invoke the skill through your host's skill mechanism (the Skill tool on Claude Code; the skill/prompt loader on Codex). When you invoke a skill, its content is loaded and presented to you — follow it directly. Never read a skill file's raw contents manually as a substitute for invoking it.

Skill Inventory

Gateway

Call	Trigger	Responsibility
tn:compass	Auto-injected on every session start	Identify applicable skills, select development path

Spec-Driven Flow Skills

Call	Trigger	Responsibility
tn:scout	User wants to quickly explore ideas or investigate problems	Standalone exploration mode, produces no files
tn:draft	User raises a new requirement/change	Generate proposal + specs + design + tasks
tn:forge	User wants to implement an existing change	Implementation entry, chains tn:blueprint → tn:assemble
tn:audit	After implementation is complete	Dual-layer verification: code↔spec + code↔real requirements
tn:vault	Change complete, confirming archive	delta spec merge → move into archive/

Process Skills

Call	Trigger	Responsibility
tn:spark	Before new features or large changes	Socratic questioning → approach comparison → set direction
tn:blueprint	Have a clear spec, about to implement	Break into bite-sized tasks
tn:diagnose	Hit a bug, test failure	4 phases: root cause → pattern → hypothesis → fix
tn:gate	About to claim work complete	Iron law: run command → read output → confirm → then claim

Execution Skills

Call	Trigger	Responsibility
tn:redgreen	Implementing any feature or fix	Red-green-refactor cycle
tn:assemble	Have an implementation plan to execute	Subagent dispatch + per-task review + parallel scheduling
tn:inspect	After verify passes	Global review: cross-task consistency, architecture, security
tn:isolate	Need isolated feature development	Create isolated workspace → verify test baseline

Wrap-up Skill

Call	Trigger	Responsibility
tn:ship	After review passes	Verify tests → present 4 options → execute

Domain Skill (auto-detected)

Call	Trigger	Responsibility
tn:craft	Any frontend/UI/page/component/style work (see Frontend Detection Rules below)	Design thinking → aesthetic guidance → production-grade code

Frontend Detection Rules

When evaluating a user's request, check for these signals. If ANY match, invoke tn:craft during the implementation phase. Keywords are intentionally bilingual so Chinese user input is also detected:

Signal type	Keyword examples
Direct frontend	"页面/page", "组件/component", "UI", "界面/interface", "布局/layout", "样式/style", "前端/frontend"
Interactive elements	"按钮/button", "表单/form", "弹窗/dialog", "导航/nav", "菜单/menu", "表格/table", "列表/list", "卡片/card", "对话框/modal"
Visual	"配色/color", "主题/theme", "动画/animation", "响应式/responsive", "暗色模式/dark mode", "design"
Framework markers	"React", "Vue", "HTML", "CSS", "Tailwind", "Ant Design", "Element", "shadcn"

How triggering works: Frontend detection is not a standalone path — it auto-stacks onto the implementation phase of an existing path:

• Complete path: spark → draft → forge (invoke tn:craft when frontend detected) → gate → ...
• Lightweight path: draft → forge (invoke tn:craft when frontend detected) → gate → ...
• During assemble execution: task involves frontend code → call tn:craft for aesthetic guidance first → then implement
• User says "make a page" directly → skip draft, go straight to tn:craft

Development Path Selection

When a user presents a requirement, evaluate its scope and select the appropriate path:

User states a requirement
    │
    ▼
[tn:compass] evaluates change size
    │
    ├── Large change (new feature, cross-module, 3+ files) → Complete path
    ├── Medium change (single feature, 1-3 files) → Lightweight path
    ├── Urgent fix (production bug) → Fix path
    └── Trivial change (typo, config value) → Direct execution

Standalone entries (no path selection):
[tn:scout] always available, standalone exploration

Complete Path (Large Changes)

tn:spark → tn:draft → [tn:isolate] → tn:forge(blueprint→assemble) → tn:gate → [user chooses next flow]

Lightweight Path (Medium Changes)

tn:draft → tn:forge(blueprint→assemble) → tn:gate → [user chooses next flow]

Fix Path (Emergency Bugs)

tn:diagnose → tn:redgreen → tn:gate → [user chooses next flow]

Post-Check Menu

After tn:gate passes, present the menu for user to choose:

Option	Flow	Use case
1. Full verification	audit → inspect → ship → vault	Production code, critical features
2. Standard flow	audit → ship → vault	Internal projects, routine features
3. Quick commit	ship → vault	Small changes, prototypes
4. Verify only	audit (don't commit)	Just check, don't commit

Direct Execution (Trivial Changes)

Direct edit → tn:gate (optional)

Independent Explore Mode

tn:scout — always available, pure thinking, produces no files, enters no path

Flow Transition Rules

Every skill has a Next Step section. When a skill completes, follow its transition:

Current skill	Normal exit	Exception exit
tn:spark	tn:draft	—
tn:draft	tn:forge	—
tn:forge	tn:gate (internally chains blueprint→assemble, ends at gate)	tn:diagnose (when implementation hits an issue)
tn:blueprint	tn:assemble (internal chain)	—
tn:assemble	tn:gate	tn:diagnose (when issues arise)
tn:redgreen	Return to caller	tn:diagnose (after 3 RED→GREEN attempts still failing)
tn:gate	Show menu for user choice (see Post-Check Menu)	Return to current skill (when tests fail)
tn:audit	Follow check menu choice (review / finish / end)	WARNING → fix → tn:gate → tn:audit (loop limit 3 rounds) / tn:forge (large deviation) / tn:draft (spec wrong)
tn:inspect	tn:ship	Back to tn:forge (Critical issues)
tn:ship	tn:vault	—
tn:scout	None (standalone mode)	tn:draft (when user decides to implement)
tn:craft	Return to caller (usually tn:assemble or direct implementation)	—
tn:diagnose	tn:redgreen → tn:gate	—
tn:isolate	Return to caller	—
tn:vault	End	—

How transitions work:

• Each skill's SKILL.md contains a ## Next Step section with condition branches
• After completing a skill, read its Next Step to determine what to invoke next
• This table is the authoritative reference — if a skill's Next Step conflicts with this table, this table wins
• Users can always override by explicitly invoking any skill

Skill Priority

When multiple skills could apply, use this order:

1. Process skills first (tn:spark, tn:diagnose) — these determine HOW to approach the task
2. Implementation skills second (tn:craft) — these guide execution

"Let's build X" → tn:spark first, then implementation skills. "Fix this bug" → tn:diagnose first, then domain-specific skills.

Skill Types

Rigid (tn:redgreen, tn:diagnose, tn:gate): Follow exactly. Don't adapt away discipline.

Flexible (tn:spark, tn:blueprint, tn:scout): Adapt principles to context.

Flow (tn:draft → tn:forge → tn:gate → tn:audit → tn:inspect → tn:ship → tn:vault): Sequential, each step has clear output.

The skill itself tells you which.

Red Flags

These thoughts mean STOP — you're rationalizing:

Thought	Reality
"This is just a simple question"	Questions are tasks. Check for skills.
"I need more context first"	Skill check comes BEFORE clarifying questions.
"Let me explore the codebase first"	Skills tell you HOW to explore. Check first.
"This doesn't need a formal skill"	If a skill exists, use it.
"I remember this skill"	Skills evolve. Read current version.
"The skill is overkill"	Simple things become complex. Use it.
"I'll just do this one thing first"	Check BEFORE doing anything.

Quick Reference

Dimension	Key point
Total skills	16 (gateway 1 + flow 5 + process 4 + execution 4 + wrap-up 1 + domain 1)
Path selection	Complete / Lightweight / Fix / Direct
Transition mechanism	Each skill's Next Step + the gateway Flow Transition Rules table
Skill types	Rigid (redgreen/diagnose/gate) / Flexible (spark/blueprint/scout) / Flow (draft→vault)
Source of truth	Disk files are the sole source of truth (techneering/changes/<name>/)

Cross-Session Resume

The skill system maintains no session state. All progress is inferred from disk files:

New session starts
    │
    ▼
User says "continue implementing XXX change"
    → scan techneering/changes/<name>/ directory
    → infer current progress from existing files:
      ├── only proposal.md → back to draft, continue
      ├── has proposal + specs + design + tasks → enter forge
      ├── tasks.md has unchecked checkboxes → continue implementation
      └── all checkboxes checked → enter tn:gate (show menu after passing)

Disk files are the sole source of truth. Every skill checks files first to determine progress.

Next Step

This is the gateway skill, loaded at session start. It does not have a Next Step — it prepares you to invoke the correct skill based on the user's request.

Guardrails

• Never skip skill check before responding to a user message
• Never read a skill file's raw contents manually as a substitute for invoking it — use your host's skill mechanism
• User instructions always override skill instructions
• When in doubt about which skill applies, invoke it to check — wrong invocations are harmless
• The Flow Transition Rules table is the authoritative reference for skill transitions