| name | gstack-design-review |
| description | GStack design-review method for reviewing rendered UI, landing pages, decks, or visual artifacts for hierarchy, layout, accessibility, and polish. |
GStack Design Review Adapter
This is a Codex role-system adapter for Garry Tan's gstack gstack-design-review method.
When To Use
Use this when:
- a rendered UI, deck, or visual asset needs critique;
- QA needs visual readiness evidence;
- visual polish or hierarchy is questionable;
- the user explicitly invokes
$gstack-design-review.
Workflow
- Keep the active role boundary. Do not expand scope just because this gstack method is useful.
- Read the relevant repo/docs/evidence first when the task depends on current state.
- Read
../gstack/references/methodology.md if you need the shared method map, then use the section named Design Methods.
- Produce: visual findings, severity, screenshots/check notes, recommended fixes, and verification criteria.
- Return the result in the active role's normal format, including boundaries, validation, and unresolved decisions when applicable.
Boundaries
- Treat upstream gstack as external methodology, not local-owned project state.
- Do not run upstream gstack runtime, telemetry, browser-cookie import, upgrade checks, or host routing injection automatically.
- Do not create or edit
CLAUDE.md, .claude/, .agents/, or upstream routing files unless the user explicitly asks for upstream gstack installation work.
- Do not write files, commit, push, deploy, restart, migrate, clean, delete, or change production unless the active role prompt explicitly allows it.
- Preserve this repository's
QA versus 测试 split: formal test cases/reports belong to 测试 and $test-case-report-builder.