arxiv-intelligence-reporting

name	arxiv-intelligence-reporting
description	Summarize arXiv paper intelligence digests for ML, AI, foundation/foundation models, LLMs, post-training, agentic workflows, evals, harness engineering, loop engineering, recursive self-improvement, and self-improving systems. Use when asked to run or interpret the loopcraft arXiv workflow, prepare a daily paper digest, or identify the most interesting recent arXiv submissions.

arXiv Intelligence Reporting

Workflow

1. Work in the loopcraft source tree from the runtime context (the repo with Makefile, config/, and src/) unless the user gives another workspace.
2. Fetch a fresh digest by running the direct CLI: PYTHONPATH=src python -m loopcraft.research_intel.arxiv.cli run --config config/arxiv_intel.yaml. You are executing inside a headless loop run, so do not re-enter the control plane for this loop (no loopctl run / make run of arxiv-intel) — that recurses. (The control plane also enforces this programmatically: it sets LOOPCRAFT_ACTIVE_LOOP for the run and refuses re-entry into the same loop while it is set.) If network access or arXiv API errors occur, report that first.
3. Read state/research/arxiv/latest.md and latest.json from the loopcraft memory ledger (or the emitted direct-CLI paths). Prefer JSON for exact fields and Markdown for human-readable ordering.
4. Summarize the 5-10 most interesting papers, focusing on:
   • Foundation/frontier models and LLM systems
   • Post-training, preference optimization, RLHF, and evals
   • Agentic workflows, tool use, planning, memory, and orchestration
   • Harnesses, loop engineering, verifiers, and production agent infrastructure
   • Recursive self-improvement, self-improving systems, and self-evolving agents
5. Include arXiv abstract links and PDF links for every cited paper.
6. Mention code, model, dataset, or project links from arXiv comments when present.
7. Be clear when a conclusion is inferred from abstract metadata rather than the full paper.

Reporting Standards

• Lead with errors, empty fetches, or suspiciously low paper counts.
• Mention generated date and fetched/ranked counts when available.
• Group findings by theme rather than only by score.
• Prefer papers with concrete systems, benchmarks, training recipes, eval methods, agent loops, or self-improvement mechanisms.
• Avoid presenting broad surveys as the top signal unless they contain unusually useful taxonomy or synthesis.
• End with loopcraft implications: what to read, what to prototype, what to add to eval/harness practice, and what to watch.

Useful Commands

In-loop, always use the direct CLI below; never re-run this loop through the control plane (that recurses). Operators trigger the loop from a shell via its documented make/loopctl target — this skill should not.

PYTHONPATH=src python -m loopcraft.research_intel.arxiv.cli run --config config/arxiv_intel.yaml
PYTHONPATH=src python -m loopcraft.research_intel.arxiv.cli run --config config/arxiv_intel.yaml --include-seen
PYTHONPATH=src python -m pytest -q

Expected Output Shape

**Daily arXiv Intelligence**
Fetched N papers; ranked M. Errors: none.

**Most Interesting Papers**
- Title: concise synthesis. arXiv: [...](...). PDF: [...](...). Code/data/model: [...](...). Why it matters: ...

**Themes**
- Theme: papers and shared implication.

**Loopcraft Implications**
- Actionable observation for loop engineering, harnesses, evals, agents, tool use, or self-improving systems.

This shape only describes the human-readable digest. Updating the durable files (papers.jsonl, seen.json, latest.md/latest.json, and the run-scoped history/ archives) is enforced by the CLI/store, declared as the loop's outputs in loops/arxiv-intel.yaml, and checked against skills/arxiv-intelligence-reporting/verify.md. See that verify file for the authoritative goal conditions.