| name | neqsim-depressurization-mdmt |
| version | 1.0.0 |
| description | Emergency depressurization (blowdown) per API 521 §5.20 and minimum design metal temperature (MDMT) assessment per ASME UCS-66 / API 579 / EN 13445 — VU-flash transient inventory model, time-to-target-pressure, low-temperature embrittlement screening, and integration with PSV/flare loads. USE WHEN: a task requires sizing a blowdown valve, generating a P-vs-time curve for a vessel under fire / depressurization, checking MDMT against blowdown end-temperature, providing source terms for relief and flare networks, or distinguishing blowdown from trapped-liquid fire rupture screening. Anchors on neqsim.process.safety.depressurization.DepressurizationSimulator and neqsim.process.safety.mdmt.MDMTCalculator. |
| last_verified | 2026-04-26 |
| requires | {"java_packages":["neqsim.process.safety.depressurization","neqsim.process.safety.mdmt"]} |
NeqSim Depressurization & MDMT Skill
Transient blowdown / depressurization for inventory release on fire or
controlled emergency, plus the minimum design metal temperature (MDMT) check
that drives material selection. The two are linked: blowdown end-temperatures
(often −80 to −120 °C for hydrocarbon gas) usually drive MDMT, which in turn
drives whether LTCS, low-temperature carbon-Mn, 3.5 % Ni or 9 % Ni / 304L is
required.
When to Use
- Sizing a blowdown / depressurization valve to reach 50 % pressure in 15 min
(API 521 §5.20 fire case) or 7 bar in some operator standards
- Generating P(t), T(t), m(t) curves for the relief / flare load case
- Screening MDMT against end-of-blowdown vessel-wall temperature
- Producing source terms for the flare network (
neqsim-relief-flare-network)
- Distinguishing depressurization cases from blocked-in liquid fire rupture cases,
where
neqsim-trapped-liquid-fire-rupture is the primary workflow
Distinct from neqsim-relief-flare-network (steady-state PSV sizing) and
neqsim-dynamic-simulation (continuous-process transients) — this skill is the
specific blowdown + MDMT pair.
Standards
- API 521 7th ed. — Pressure-relieving and depressuring systems (§5.20 blowdown)
- API STD 520 — PSV sizing, used for choke check at the BDV
- ASME UCS-66 / UCS-66.1 — MDMT impact-test exemption curves (carbon steel)
- ASME UHA-51 — austenitic stainless steel low-temperature service
- API 579 / FFS-1 §3 — fitness-for-service, MDMT for in-service vessels
- EN 13445-2 Annex B — European MDMT and impact-test approach
- NORSOK L-002 — piping system design (low-temperature operation)
Method 1 — Blowdown Simulation (VU-flash)
import neqsim.thermo.system.SystemSrkEos;
import neqsim.thermo.system.SystemInterface;
import neqsim.process.safety.depressurization.DepressurizationSimulator;
SystemInterface gas = new SystemSrkEos(273.15 + 50.0, 100.0);
gas.addComponent("methane", 0.92);
gas.addComponent("ethane", 0.05);
gas.addComponent("propane", 0.03);
gas.setMixingRule("classic");
gas.setTotalNumberOfMoles(5000.0);
DepressurizationSimulator sim = new DepressurizationSimulator(gas);
sim.setVesselVolume(50.0);
sim.setOrificeArea(5.0e-4);
sim.setBackPressure(1.5);
sim.setHeatInput(0.0);
sim.run(900.0, 1.0);
double[] t = sim.timeSeries();
double[] p = sim.pressureSeries();
double[] T = sim.temperatureSeries();
double[] m = sim.massFlowSeries();
double pEnd = p[p.length - 1];
double tEnd = T[T.length - 1];
double t50 = sim.timeToPressure(50.0);
The simulator uses the U–V flash (ops.VUflash(V, U)) at every step — internal
energy decreases by h_out · ṁ · Δt and volume is held constant by the vessel,
so each step is a fully consistent thermodynamic state. Joule-Thomson cooling
across the BDV is captured via an isenthalpic flash to the back pressure for the
exit-temperature output.
Fire case
sim.setHeatInput(60_000.0);
API 521 fire heat input on uninsulated vessels:
Q = 43.2 · F · A^0.82 [W]
with environment factor F (= 1.0 for un-insulated, 0.30 for fireproof
insulation, 0.075 for water-spray) and wetted area A in m². The simulator
accepts the value directly so any of the API 521, NFPA 30 or NORSOK
correlations can be used upstream.
Method 2 — BDV Sizing Iteration
Typical workflow:
- Start from a target such as 50 % of design pressure in 15 min (API 521), 7 bar in 15 min, or the relevant company/project criterion from the private basis.
- Guess BDV
Cd · A, run sim.run(...), read sim.timeToPressure(target).
- Iterate area until target is met without choking the flare header.
- Verify the minimum T(t) is above the vessel MDMT.
A reference iteration loop is available as
DepressurizationSimulator.sizeForTargetPressure(targetBar, targetTimeS).
Method 3 — MDMT Assessment
import neqsim.process.safety.mdmt.MDMTCalculator;
MDMTCalculator mdmt = new MDMTCalculator();
mdmt.setMaterial("SA-516-70N");
mdmt.setThicknessMM(50.0);
mdmt.setStressRatio(0.35);
double mdmtC = mdmt.computeUCS66();
The calculator implements:
- UCS-66 Curve A / B / C / D lookup vs material specification
- UCS-66.1 stress-ratio reduction (lower stress → lower MDMT)
- API 579 §3 Fitness-for-Service path for in-service vessels with crack
reassessment factors
- EN 13445-2 Annex B alternative if requested
Pass / fail check
double bdvEndTemp = sim.minTemperatureC();
boolean acceptable = bdvEndTemp >= mdmtC;
if (!acceptable) {
}
Many company practices add a 5-10 °C margin between blowdown end-temperature
and MDMT. Record the actual project or operator margin in the private task
basis instead of hard-coding it in public guidance.
Method 4 — Source Term to Flare Network
double[] mdot = sim.massFlowSeries();
double[] T = sim.temperatureSeries();
double[] P = sim.pressureSeries();
double mdotPeak = sim.peakMassFlow();
This is the standard handoff between the depressurization model and the flare
network sizing skill (neqsim-relief-flare-network).
Method 5 — Coupled Multi-Vessel Blowdown to a Shared Header (API 521 §7)
When several vessels blow down simultaneously into one flare/disposal header, the
combined load — not any single vessel — sizes the header. MultiVesselBlowdownStudy
superimposes each source on a common time grid and checks the header Mach at the peak.
import neqsim.process.safety.depressurization.MultiVesselBlowdownStudy;
import neqsim.process.safety.depressurization.MultiVesselBlowdownStudy.MultiVesselBlowdownResult;
MultiVesselBlowdownResult res = new MultiVesselBlowdownStudy()
.addSource("V-100", bdvSim100)
.addSource("V-200", bdvSim200)
.addSourceResult("V-300", precomputed)
.setHeader(0.6, 1.5, 288.15, 0.020, 1.30)
.setMaxAllowableMach(0.70)
.run();
double peak = res.getPeakTotalMassFlowKgPerS();
double tPeak = res.getPeakTimeS();
double mach = res.getHeaderMach();
boolean okMach = res.isHeaderMachAcceptable();
String report = res.summary();
Use addSourceResult(...) with a pre-computed DepressurizationResult to avoid
re-running the (slow) VU-flash transient for vessels already simulated.
Method 5b — Governed STID/TR2000 Dynamic Blowdown + Flare Handoff
For agentic engineering studies that start from STID/P&ID drawings, line lists,
equipment lists, and TR2000 pipe/valve/material evidence, use the governed data
source and runner instead of stitching transient notebooks together by hand.
Key classes:
LineEquipmentListEvidence — reviewed line-list and equipment-list rows used
to build the dynamic model.
DynamicBlowdownFlareStudyDataSource — source-traceable package with one
BlowdownSource per protected equipment item plus header, flare, PSV, fire,
topology, and evidence status.
DynamicBlowdownFlareStudyRunner — runs DepressurizationSimulator, aggregates
loads with MultiVesselBlowdownStudy, sizes PSV orifices through
ReliefValveSizing, and estimates peak/cumulative flare heat, emissions,
radiation distance, and capacity utilization.
DynamicBlowdownFlareStudyHandoff — versioned JSON package containing
dynamic_blowdown_flare_result.v1 and dynamic_blowdown_flare_load_handoff.v1.
LineEquipmentListEvidence lineEq = LineEquipmentListEvidence.builder("line-eq-001")
.lineListReviewed(true)
.equipmentListReviewed(true)
.addEquipment("V-100", "separator", 50.0, 85.0, 70.0, 313.15)
.addLine("BD-100", "V-100", "FLARE-HDR", 6.0, 0.154, 0.007, 45.0, "DD100", "API 5L X52")
.build();
DynamicBlowdownFlareStudyDataSource.BlowdownSource source =
DynamicBlowdownFlareStudyDataSource.BlowdownSource.builder("V-100", gas)
.equipmentTag("V-100")
.vesselVolumeM3(50.0)
.orificeDiameterM(0.035)
.dischargeCoefficient(0.72)
.backPressureBara(1.5)
.api521FireCase(120.0, true, true)
.psvBasis(85.0, 0.21, false, false)
.build();
DynamicBlowdownFlareStudyDataSource data = DynamicBlowdownFlareStudyDataSource.builder("BD-FLARE-001")
.lineEquipmentListEvidence(lineEq)
.addSource(source)
.flareHeader(0.6, 1.5, 288.15, 0.020, 1.30)
.flareGeometry(0.8, 50.0, 0.20)
.stidDiagramReviewed(true)
.lineEquipmentListsReviewed(true)
.vesselInventoryReviewed(true)
.valveSizingBasisReviewed(true)
.psvBasisReviewed(true)
.flareSystemBasisReviewed(true)
.fireCaseReviewed(true)
.standardsReviewed(false)
.build();
DynamicBlowdownFlareStudyHandoff handoff = DynamicBlowdownFlareStudyRunner.builder()
.timeStepSeconds(1.0)
.maxTimeSeconds(900.0)
.build()
.run(data);
Readiness semantics mirror the pipe-fire runner: missing source fluid, volume,
BDV/orifice diameter, discharge coefficient, or flare backpressure blocks the
calculation; missing reviewed topology, TR2000, PSV, fire, or flare capacity
evidence keeps the result at screening level.
Method 6 — ESD Response-Time Budget (NOG 070 / IEC 61511)
The blowdown / isolation only mitigates the relief load if the ESD valve actually
closes in time. EsdResponseTimeSimulator sums the SIF loop contributions and
compares against the allowable budget.
import neqsim.process.safety.esd.EsdResponseTimeSimulator;
import neqsim.process.safety.esd.EsdResponseTimeSimulator.EsdResponseTimeResult;
EsdResponseTimeResult esd = new EsdResponseTimeSimulator()
.setSifTag("SIF-2001 ESDV closure")
.addDetection("PT-2001 detection", 2.0)
.addLogic("Logic solver scan + 2oo3 vote", 0.5)
.addValve("ESDV-2001 close", 1.0, 18.0)
.setAllowableResponseTimeS(45.0)
.evaluate();
double total = esd.getTotalResponseTimeS();
double margin = esd.getMarginS();
boolean ok = esd.isWithinBudget();
This is a budgeting tool — it does not replace certified SIS proof testing or
FAT/SAT. Pair with neqsim-process-safety for the SIL determination of the SIF.
Method 7 — Vessel Thermomechanical Safety Models
When a single-temperature lumped model is not enough — gas/liquid temperature
bifurcation in a fire, transient PSV sizing conservatism, fast filling, cryogenic
boil-off, through-wall thermal lag, or wall rupture — use the dedicated
thermomechanical classes. They reproduce the application cases of Andreasen
(2026), J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 103, 106088, and are covered by committed
regression tests. See docs/safety/vessel_thermomechanical_safety.md for the
full guide.
import neqsim.process.safety.depressurization.NonEquilibriumBlowdownModel;
import neqsim.process.safety.depressurization.NonEquilibriumBlowdownModel.NemResult;
NonEquilibriumBlowdownModel nem =
new NonEquilibriumBlowdownModel(fluid, 10.0, 0.025, 0.72, 1.0e5);
nem.setFireExposure(0.9, 1100.0, 30.0, 25.0).setWall(8000.0, 470.0);
nem.setTimeStep(1.0).setMaxTime(600.0).setStopPressure(1.5e5);
NemResult bd = nem.run();
double bifurcationK = bd.maxTemperatureBifurcationK;
import neqsim.process.safety.depressurization.DynamicPsvSizingStudy;
DynamicPsvSizingStudy.SizingComparison cmp =
new DynamicPsvSizingStudy(gas, 1.0, 150000.0, 11.0e5, 0.21, 1.0e5)
.setBlowdownFraction(0.1).setDischargeCoefficient(0.975).run();
double oversizing = cmp.oversizingRatio;
import neqsim.process.safety.depressurization.VesselFillingSimulator;
VesselFillingSimulator.VesselFillingResult fill =
new VesselFillingSimulator(h2, 0.06)
.setInletConditions(283.15, 360.0, 0.015)
.setTargetPressure(351.0)
.setLinerTemperatureLimits(233.15, 338.15)
.setTimeStep(1.0).setMaxTime(4000.0).run();
boolean linerOk = fill.linerLimitsMet;
import neqsim.process.util.heattransfer.BoilOffCalculator;
double boilOff = new BoilOffCalculator()
.setSurfaceArea(150.0).setOuterFilmCoefficient(10.0)
.setInsulationConductivity(0.025).setAmbientTemperatureK(288.15)
.setFluidTemperatureK(253.15).setLatentHeat(320000.0)
.boilOffRateKgPerH(0.30);
import neqsim.process.safety.rupture.VesselRuptureAnalyzer;
import neqsim.process.safety.rupture.MaterialStrengthCurve;
MaterialStrengthCurve steel = MaterialStrengthCurve.carbonSteel("CS", 245.0e6, 415.0e6);
VesselRuptureAnalyzer.VesselRuptureResult rup =
new VesselRuptureAnalyzer(0.5, 0.012, steel).analyze(timeS, pressurePa, metalTempK);
boolean ruptured = rup.ruptured;
Supporting classes: CompositeWallConduction (1D transient multi-layer wall,
Crank-Nicolson; use the static biotNumber(...) helper — lumped is fine for
Bi < 0.1), VesselHeatTransferCorrelations (Woodfield filling Nusselt,
Rohsenow nucleate boiling), and BlockedOutletOverpressureAnalyzer (blocked-in
charging overpressure with relief-demand flag).
Common Pitfalls
- Adiabatic vs fire case — running adiabatic blowdown gives the coldest
end-temperature (worst for MDMT). Running fire case gives the highest peak
flow (worst for flare network). Both must be checked separately.
- Single component vs multi-component — MDMT is driven by the
end-of-blowdown temperature, which depends on JT coefficient and is sensitive
to ethane / propane content. Always use a representative composition, not a
pure-methane simplification.
- Ignoring liquid level — vessels with liquid have huge thermal mass; the
gas phase cools quickly while the liquid holds temperature. The simulator
handles two-phase systems automatically.
- Choked vs sub-critical flow — the BDV chokes for most of the blowdown.
Make sure the simulator's flow model uses choked-flow correlations until
P_vessel / P_back < 1/r_critical.
- Stress ratio = 1 — using 1.0 for stress ratio gives the most conservative
MDMT. Operating-pressure stress ratio (0.30–0.40) usually relaxes MDMT by
10–30 °C.
Verification Tests
./mvnw test -Dtest=DepressurizationSimulatorTest,MDMTCalculatorTest,MultiVesselBlowdownStudyTest,EsdResponseTimeSimulatorTest
./mvnw test -Dtest=DynamicPsvSizingStudyTest,VesselFillingSimulatorTest,VesselRuptureAnalyzerTest,BoilOffCalculatorTest
See Also
neqsim-relief-flare-network — PSV sizing, flare radiation, header back-pressure
neqsim-trapped-liquid-fire-rupture — blocked-in liquid thermal expansion, PFP demand, and rupture source-term handoff
neqsim-dynamic-simulation — continuous-process transients with controllers
neqsim-consequence-analysis — what happens after the released gas ignites
neqsim-flow-assurance — JT cooling and hydrate formation in blowdown
neqsim-process-safety — LOPA / SIL for the blowdown SIF (BDV-SIF)