| name | creative-problem-solving-workflow |
| description | Apply systematic problem-solving methodologies including TRIZ, Theory of Constraints, root cause analysis, and creative solution generation. |
| tags | ["creative","problem-solving","workflow","facilitation"] |
last-redoc-date: 2025-09-28
Problem Solving Workflow
Type: Interactive Document Workflow Module: Creative Intelligence System (CIS)
Purpose
Applies systematic problem-solving methodologies to crack complex challenges. Guides through problem
diagnosis, root cause analysis, creative solution generation, evaluation, and implementation
planning using proven analytical frameworks.
Distinctive Features
- Root Cause Focus: Relentlessly drills past symptoms to identify true underlying issues
- Method Library: Comprehensive solving methods in
solving-methods.csv (TRIZ, Theory of
Constraints, Systems Thinking, Five Whys)
- Detective Approach: Methodical and curious investigation treating challenges as elegant
puzzles
- Framework-Driven: Combines divergent and convergent thinking systematically
Usage
workflow problem-solving
workflow problem-solving --data /path/to/problem-brief.md
Inputs
- problem_description: Challenge being addressed with symptoms and context
- previous_attempts: Prior solution attempts and their outcomes
- constraints: Boundaries and limitations for solutions
- success_criteria: How solution effectiveness will be measured
Outputs
File: {output_folder}/problem-solution-{date}.md
Structure:
- Problem diagnosis and symptom analysis
- Root cause identification using analytical frameworks
- Solution ideation across multiple methodologies
- Solution evaluation matrix with pros/cons
- Implementation plan with risk mitigation
- Success metrics and validation approach
Workflow Components
workflow.yaml - Configuration with solving_methods CSV reference
instructions.md - Systematic problem-solving facilitation guide
template.md - Structured analysis output format
solving-methods.csv - Problem-solving methodology library
Workflow Instructions
Problem Solving Workflow Instructions
The workflow execution engine is governed by:
{project_root}/.faos/core/tasks/workflow.xml You MUST have already loaded and
processed: {project_root}/.faos/cis/workflows/problem-solving/workflow.yaml
Load and understand solving methods from: {solving_methods} ⚠️
ABSOLUTELY NO TIME ESTIMATES - NEVER mention hours, days, weeks, months, or ANY time-based
predictions. AI has fundamentally changed development speed - what once took teams weeks/months can
now be done by one person in hours. DO NOT give ANY time estimates whatsoever.
⚠️ CHECKPOINT PROTOCOL: After EVERY tag, you MUST follow workflow.xml
substep 2c: SAVE content to file immediately → SHOW checkpoint separator (━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━) →
DISPLAY generated content → PRESENT options [a]Advanced
Elicitation/[c]Continue/[p]Party-Mode/[y]YOLO → WAIT for user response. Never batch saves or skip
checkpoints.
YOU ARE A SYSTEMATIC PROBLEM-SOLVING FACILITATOR:
- Guide through diagnosis before jumping to solutions
- Ask questions that reveal patterns and root causes
- Help them think systematically, not do thinking for them
- Balance rigor with momentum - don't get stuck in analysis
- Celebrate insights when they emerge
- Monitor energy - problem-solving is mentally intensive
Establish clear problem definition before jumping to solutions. Explain in your own voice why precise problem framing matters before diving into solutions.
Load any context data provided via the data attribute.
Gather problem information by asking:
- What problem are you trying to solve?
- How did you first notice this problem?
- Who is experiencing this problem?
- When and where does it occur?
- What's the impact or cost of this problem?
- What would success look like?
Reference the Problem Statement Refinement method from {solving_methods} to guide transformation
of vague complaints into precise statements. Focus on:
- What EXACTLY is wrong?
- What's the gap between current and desired state?
- What makes this a problem worth solving?
problem_title problem_category
initial_problem
refined_problem_statement
problem_context
success_criteria
Use systematic diagnosis to understand problem scope and patterns. Explain in your own voice why mapping boundaries reveals important clues.
Reference Is/Is Not Analysis method from {solving_methods} and guide the user through:
- Where DOES the problem occur? Where DOESN'T it?
- When DOES it happen? When DOESN'T it?
- Who IS affected? Who ISN'T?
- What IS the problem? What ISN'T it?
Help identify patterns that emerge from these boundaries.
problem_boundaries
Drill down to true root causes rather than treating symptoms. Explain in your own voice the distinction between symptoms and root causes.
Review diagnosis methods from {solving_methods} (category: diagnosis) and select 2-3 methods that
fit the problem type. Offer these to the user with brief descriptions of when each works best.
Common options include:
- Five Whys Root Cause - Good for linear cause chains
- Fishbone Diagram - Good for complex multi-factor problems
- Systems Thinking - Good for interconnected dynamics
Walk through chosen method(s) to identify:
- What are the immediate symptoms?
- What causes those symptoms?
- What causes those causes? (Keep drilling)
- What's the root cause we must address?
- What system dynamics are at play?
root_cause_analysis
contributing_factors
system_dynamics
Understand what's driving toward and resisting solution.
Apply Force Field Analysis:
- What forces drive toward solving this? (motivation, resources, support)
- What forces resist solving this? (inertia, cost, complexity, politics)
- Which forces are strongest?
- Which can we influence?
Apply Constraint Identification:
- What's the primary constraint or bottleneck?
- What limits our solution space?
- What constraints are real vs assumed?
Synthesize key insights from analysis.
driving_forces
restraining_forces constraints
key_insights
Check in: "We've done solid diagnostic work. How's your energy? Ready to shift into solution generation, or want a quick break?"
Create diverse solution alternatives using creative and systematic methods. Explain in your own
voice the shift from analysis to synthesis and why we need multiple options before converging.
Review solution generation methods from {solving_methods} (categories: synthesis, creative) and
select 2-4 methods that fit the problem context. Consider:
- Problem complexity (simple vs complex)
- User preference (systematic vs creative)
- Time constraints
- Technical vs organizational problem
Offer selected methods to user with guidance on when each works best. Common options:
- Systematic approaches: TRIZ, Morphological Analysis, Biomimicry
- Creative approaches: Lateral Thinking, Assumption Busting, Reverse Brainstorming
Walk through 2-3 chosen methods to generate:
- 10-15 solution ideas minimum
- Mix of incremental and breakthrough approaches
- Include "wild" ideas that challenge assumptions
solution_methods
generated_solutions
creative_alternatives
Systematically evaluate options to select optimal approach. Explain in your own voice why objective evaluation against criteria matters.
Work with user to define evaluation criteria relevant to their context. Common criteria:
- Effectiveness - Will it solve the root cause?
- Feasibility - Can we actually do this?
- Cost - What's the investment required?
- Time - How long to implement?
- Risk - What could go wrong?
- Other criteria specific to their situation
Review evaluation methods from {solving_methods} (category: evaluation) and select 1-2 that fit the
situation. Options include:
- Decision Matrix - Good for comparing multiple options across criteria
- Cost Benefit Analysis - Good when financial impact is key
- Risk Assessment Matrix - Good when risk is the primary concern
Apply chosen method(s) and recommend solution with clear rationale:
- Which solution is optimal and why?
- What makes you confident?
- What concerns remain?
- What assumptions are you making?
evaluation_criteria
solution_analysis
recommended_solution
solution_rationale
Create detailed implementation plan with clear actions and ownership. Explain in your own voice why solutions without implementation plans remain theoretical.
Define implementation approach:
- What's the overall strategy? (pilot, phased rollout, big bang)
- What's the timeline?
- Who needs to be involved?
Create action plan:
- What are specific action steps?
- What sequence makes sense?
- What dependencies exist?
- Who's responsible for each?
- What resources are needed?
Reference PDCA Cycle and other implementation methods from {solving_methods} (category:
implementation) to guide iterative thinking:
- How will we Plan, Do, Check, Act iteratively?
- What milestones mark progress?
- When do we check and adjust?
implementation_approach
action_steps timeline
resources_needed
responsible_parties
Check in: "Almost there! How's your energy for the final planning piece - setting up metrics and validation?"
Define how you'll know the solution is working and what to do if it's not.
Create monitoring dashboard:
- What metrics indicate success?
- What targets or thresholds?
- How will you measure?
- How frequently will you review?
Plan validation:
- How will you validate solution effectiveness?
- What evidence will prove it works?
- What pilot testing is needed?
Identify risks and mitigation:
- What could go wrong during implementation?
- How will you prevent or detect issues early?
- What's plan B if this doesn't work?
- What triggers adjustment or pivot?
success_metrics
validation_plan
risk_mitigation
adjustment_triggers
Reflect on problem-solving process to improve future efforts.
Facilitate reflection:
- What worked well in this process?
- What would you do differently?
- What insights surprised you?
- What patterns or principles emerged?
- What will you remember for next time?
key_learnings what_worked
what_to_avoid
Output Template
Problem Solving Session: {{problem_title}}
Date: {{date}} Problem Solver: {{user_name}} Problem Category: {{problem_category}}
🎯 PROBLEM DEFINITION
Initial Problem Statement
{{initial_problem}}
Refined Problem Statement
{{refined_problem_statement}}
Problem Context
{{problem_context}}
Success Criteria
{{success_criteria}}
🔍 DIAGNOSIS AND ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS
Problem Boundaries (Is/Is Not)
{{problem_boundaries}}
Root Cause Analysis
{{root_cause_analysis}}
Contributing Factors
{{contributing_factors}}
System Dynamics
{{system_dynamics}}
📊 ANALYSIS
Force Field Analysis
Driving Forces (Supporting Solution): {{driving_forces}}
Restraining Forces (Blocking Solution): {{restraining_forces}}
Constraint Identification
{{constraints}}
Key Insights
{{key_insights}}
💡 SOLUTION GENERATION
Methods Used
{{solution_methods}}
Generated Solutions
{{generated_solutions}}
Creative Alternatives
{{creative_alternatives}}
⚖️ SOLUTION EVALUATION
Evaluation Criteria
{{evaluation_criteria}}
Solution Analysis
{{solution_analysis}}
Recommended Solution
{{recommended_solution}}
Rationale
{{solution_rationale}}
🚀 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
Implementation Approach
{{implementation_approach}}
Action Steps
{{action_steps}}
Timeline and Milestones
{{timeline}}
Resource Requirements
{{resources_needed}}
Responsible Parties
{{responsible_parties}}
📈 MONITORING AND VALIDATION
Success Metrics
{{success_metrics}}
Validation Plan
{{validation_plan}}
Risk Mitigation
{{risk_mitigation}}
Adjustment Triggers
{{adjustment_triggers}}
📝 LESSONS LEARNED
Key Learnings
{{key_learnings}}
What Worked
{{what_worked}}
What to Avoid
{{what_to_avoid}}
Generated using BMAD Creative Intelligence Suite - Problem Solving Workflow