change-risk-review

name	change-risk-review
description	Review revision risks such as meaning drift and factual regression. / 审查修订引入的语义漂移与事实回退风险。
metadata	{"builtin_skill_version":"0.1.0","copaw":{"emoji":"⚠️","requires":{}}}

change-risk-review

Purpose / 目标

Assess revision risks by focusing on meaning drift, factual regressions, and tone mismatches.

聚焦语义漂移、事实回退和语气偏差，评估修订风险。

When to use / 何时使用

• "Review risks in this revised version."
• "这次修改有没有引入风险？"
• "Check if edits changed intended meaning."

Inputs / 输入

• source_text: required
• revised_text: required
• risk_profile: optional, legal or academic or general

Output / 输出

• risk_findings: categorized risk list
• severity_map: critical or major or minor
• mitigation_steps: targeted rollback or rewrite suggestions

Boundaries / 边界

• Do not assert facts that are not in source context.
• Flag unresolved ambiguity instead of guessing.
• Keep risk claims evidence-based.

Execution Guidance / 执行指引

1. Compare semantic intent between versions.
2. Detect factual and logical inconsistencies.
3. Classify risk severity and confidence.
4. Provide mitigation actions with priority.

Example I/O / 示例输入输出

Input example:

• task: "Apply this skill to the provided text block"
• constraints: "Keep original intent and only apply necessary changes"

输入示例：

• 任务："对给定文本应用本技能"
• 约束："保持原意，仅做必要修改"

Output example:

• result: concise, structured outcome
• highlights: key findings and priority actions
• follow_up: unresolved items for human review

输出示例：

• 结果：结构化且简洁的处理结果
• 重点：关键发现与优先处理项
• 后续：需人工确认的未决事项

Prompt Contract / 提示约定

• Keep recommendations conservative and traceable.
• Separate confirmed findings from uncertain assumptions.
• Preserve original intent unless explicit rewrite is requested.
• If confidence is low, provide options and mark review-required items.