guzy0324

Academic paper rebuttal assistance for turning a paper, reviewer comments, author constraints, prior discussion, and optional literature evidence into checkpointed Chinese workflow logs, structured reviewer issues, rebuttal strategies, author to-do lists, safe LaTeX manuscript edits using versioned _vN .tex files, and polished conference-style author responses. Use when Codex is asked to analyze peer reviews, extract rebuttal issues, plan experiments or clarifications, refine strategy from human feedback, safely revise LaTeX paper sources, or draft/revise a formal rebuttal letter. Broad requests such as "help me rebuttal" or "帮我rebuttal" default to human-in-the-loop checkpoint mode: generate preparatory logs continuously, stop at human-feedback-revisions before final writing or manuscript edits, put feedback-driven content changes into versioned affected stage logs, and keep human-feedback logs as change ledgers only.