superpowers-sage-building

name	superpowers-sage:building
description	Plan-driven implementation in Sage/Acorn — reads docs/plans/ directory, implements components from approved sub-plans, runs scaffold generators (lando acorn acf:block), commits incrementally, auto-invokes block-scaffolding per ACF block, runs lando flush and lando theme-build after changes; full PR workflow with sage-reviewer gate. Invoke for: "/building", "implement from the plan", "implement from the plan", "build from the plan", "execute the plan", "start building", "code this feature". Skip when: there is no approved plan yet — run /architecture-discovery then /plan-generator first.
user-invocable	true
argument-hint	[plan path or component description]

Building — Plan-Driven Implementation

Implement Sage components by reading from plan directories, consulting design assets, and verifying after each component.

Announce at start: "I'm using the building skill to implement from the plan."

Inputs

$ARGUMENTS

If a plan path is provided, read the plan. Otherwise, check for active plan in docs/plans/.

Procedure

0) Load the plan

1. Read plan.md frontmatter for strategy, components, design-tool
2. Read architecture.md for architectural decisions
3. Read content-model.md for data modeling decisions
4. List components/ for sub-plans
5. List assets/ for design reference images

If no plan exists, suggest running /architecture-discovery then /plan-generator first.

1) Set up prerequisites

Based on content model:

1. If CPTs needed → configure config/poet.php
2. If new packages needed → lando theme-composer require <package>
3. If Options Pages needed → create ACF Options class
4. Run lando flush after PHP changes

2) Implement components (per sub-plan)

Design system gate (runs once, before the component loop):

Check that the visual foundation exists:

• resources/css/design-tokens.css — must exist and contain real tokens (not placeholder)
• Route /kitchensink — must be accessible and visually validated (Playwright screenshot taken)

If either is missing or unvalidated → invoke /sage-design-system and pause until the kitchensink screenshot confirms all tokens and UI atoms render correctly. Do NOT implement any block without a validated design system.

For each component in order:

0) Pre-fetch design reference, THEN dispatch design-extractor

CRITICAL: subagents do NOT inherit MCP tools from the calling session. Dispatching design-extractor without first persisting design data to disk produces fabricated specs with VERIFY placeholders and estimated values.

Inversion pattern — always pre-fetch in THIS thread before dispatching:

1. With the MCP tool available in this session, capture reference data to disk:

   Tool	Commands	Output
   Pencil	batch_get(resolveVariables:true, readDepth:4) + get_screenshot	assets/section-<name>.nodes.json + section-<name>-ref.png
   Figma	get_design_context + get_screenshot (with nodeId)	assets/section-<name>.nodes.json + section-<name>-ref.png
   Paper	get_node_info + get_computed_styles + get_screenshot + get_jsx	assets/section-<name>.nodes.json + section-<name>.styles.json + section-<name>-ref.png + section-<name>.reference.jsx
   Stitch	get_screen	assets/section-<name>-ref.png

2. Confirm all expected files exist on disk (ls docs/plans/<plan>/assets/).

3. NOW dispatch the design-extractor agent:

   • Mode: SURGICAL
   • Target: this specific component section only
   • Pass the pre-captured paths in the prompt
   • Output: assets/section-<name>-spec.md

The subagent reads the pre-captured files as source of truth — the MCP call was already made here. The subagent's only job is to structure the data into the spec file.

Verify the output is not fabricated: open the spec file and check for VERIFY markers or suspiciously round numbers. If found, the extraction failed — re-dispatch with clearer path references.

Fallback (no design-extractor agent available — Cursor IDE / single-agent mode):

If the subagent system is unavailable:

1. Re-read assets/section-<name>-spec.md and assets/section-<name>-ref.png from disk
2. Pull live design reference via the active MCP tool:
   • Figma: get_design_context + get_metadata (node geometry)
   • Paper: get_computed_styles + get_node_info
   • Pencil: batch_get(resolveVariables: true) + batch_get(readDepth: 4)
   • Stitch: get_screen
3. Record design-extractor: deferred in the plan.md frontmatter
4. Use the values extracted from step 2 as the source of truth

a) Re-read design reference (ALWAYS)

• Read assets/section-{name}.png or assets/section-{name}.md from disk
• NEVER rely on context memory — always re-read from disk before each component
• If asset missing, invoke /designing to capture it

b) Check content model

• Read content-model.md for this component's classification
• If not classified, invoke /modeling for this component

c) Consult reference skills

Auto-discover which reference skills are relevant:

• ACF block → read @sage-lando references/acf-composer.md
• Blade view → read @sage-lando references/blade-templates.md
• Livewire → read @acorn-livewire
• Routes → read @acorn-routes
• Tailwind/CSS → read @sage-lando references/frontend-stack.md

d) Isolation strategy — decide: worktree vs branch-commit

Isolation approach depends on the dev environment:

Environment	Isolation	Why
Lando (default for Sage)	Branch + atomic commit per component	Lando mounts /app to a fixed path in .lando.yml. Worktrees live at sibling paths and require re-mounting the container for each worktree — high friction, Lando container already knows only one path.
docker-compose / vanilla	Worktree per component	Container mount is flexible; worktrees at .worktrees/<component>/ are cheap and safe.
Bare-metal / local PHP	Worktree per component	No container constraints.
Explicit user override (--no-worktree or plan frontmatter isolation: branch-only)	Honor the override

Detection rule: if .lando.yml exists at repo root → use branch-commit strategy unless the user explicitly opts into worktrees.

Branch + atomic commit (Lando path)

# Start on the feature branch recorded in plan.md
FEATURE_BRANCH=$(grep '^branch:' docs/plans/<active-plan>/plan.md | awk '{print $2}')
git checkout "$FEATURE_BRANCH"

# Implement this component's files in place. Commit atomically when done.
# ... edit code ...

git add -A
git commit -m "feat({slug}): implement component per sub-plan"

Each component becomes one (or a few) well-scoped commit(s) on the feature branch. Roll back individually by reverting the commit. Lando keeps working without reconfiguration.

Worktree (docker-compose / bare-metal path)

FEATURE_BRANCH=$(grep '^branch:' docs/plans/<active-plan>/plan.md | awk '{print $2}')
COMPONENT_BRANCH="${FEATURE_BRANCH}-<component-name>"

git worktree add .worktrees/<component-name> -b $COMPONENT_BRANCH $FEATURE_BRANCH

Example: feature branch feat/onepage-blocks-2026-03-23, component hero:

git worktree add .worktrees/hero -b feat/onepage-blocks-2026-03-23-hero feat/onepage-blocks-2026-03-23

Implement inside the worktree. The worktree mirrors the full repo root. Theme files are at .worktrees/<component>/content/themes/<theme>/.

ZERO ARBITRARY TAILWIND VALUES. Every colour, font, spacing value must be a token declared in @theme.

{{-- ✅ Correct — use token names --}}
<section class="bg-bg text-text py-24">

{{-- ❌ Forbidden — arbitrary values are a Critical issue --}}
<section class="bg-[#131313] text-[#e5e2e1] py-[96px]">

For ACF blocks: After running lando acorn acf:block {Name} --localize, invoke /block-scaffolding for this block before proceeding. The custom element contract (tag-selector CSS scoped to block-{slug}, JS class extending BaseCustomElement, selective CSS+JS enqueue, $spacing/$supports/$styles, block README) is that skill's responsibility — do not implement manually.

e) Build and verify

After implementing:

1. lando flush — clears Acorn/Blade/OPcache (required after PHP changes)

2. lando theme-build — compiles Tailwind + JS

   • If exit non-zero: stop, report build failure. Do NOT proceed to verification.

3. Pre-capture live screenshot in THIS thread (Playwright MCP lives here, not in the subagent):

   • Navigate to the URL from the spec's Verification Inputs block
   • Take a screenshot with the canonical viewport width
   • Save to docs/plans/<plan>/assets/section-<name>-live.png

   Then dispatch visual-verifier agent with:

   • url: read from spec Verification Inputs block
   • selector: read from spec Verification Inputs block
   • spec: docs/plans/<plan>/assets/section-<name>-spec.md
   • ref: docs/plans/<plan>/assets/section-<name>-ref.png
   • live: docs/plans/<plan>/assets/section-<name>-live.png

   The subagent reads both images via the Read tool and compares visually. If the subagent somehow has Playwright MCP it can also re-capture, but the pre-captured image is the fallback when it doesn't.

4. On MATCH:

   Branch-commit strategy (Lando): already on the feature branch — nothing to merge. Proceed.

   Worktree strategy:

   git checkout <feature-branch>
   git merge <component-branch>
   git worktree remove .worktrees/<component-name>
   git branch -d <component-branch>
   

5. On DRIFT or FAIL_ARBITRARY_VALUES: fix in place → re-run lando theme-build → re-dispatch visual-verifier → commit/merge on MATCH

6. After commit/merge: git push to sync the feature branch with the remote

f) Strategy gate

• Interactive strategy: pause for user approval before next component
• Autonomous strategy: proceed to next component if verification passed
• Mixed strategy: pause only for complex components

3) Parallel delegation

When components are independent (no shared CPTs or services):

• Use dispatching-parallel-agents or subagent-driven-development base skills
• Each subagent gets: sub-plan path, asset path, content model excerpt
• Review subagent output between batches

4) Completion

After all components:

1. Run lando flush to clear all caches
2. Run lando theme-build for production build
3. Design-system changelog check: if any file under resources/views/components/*.blade.php or the @theme block in resources/css/app.css was touched this session, append an entry to docs/design-system-changelog.md (see section 5 below).
4. Commit gate: git add -A && git commit -m "feat(blocks): <feature-name> — all components verified" && git push — required before declaring the build phase complete
5. Suggest /reviewing for convention audit
6. Suggest finishing-a-development-branch for merge/PR

5) Design-system changelog auto-entry

When building touches design-system-level files (atoms, tokens, base typography, layout components), append an entry to docs/design-system-changelog.md. Create the file if absent with this structure:

# Design System Changelog

Chronological record of changes to the shared visual contract. Automatically appended by /building on completion.

## YYYY-MM-DD — <PR title or commit short summary>

### Atoms
- `<x-component>` **added prop `tone`** — default, backward-compatible
- `<x-button>` **added variant `secondary-dark`** — text-link on dark bg

### Tokens
- `--text-h2-compact: 44px` (new)
- `--container-narrow: 360px` (new)

### Modifier classes
- `h2.hero`, `h2.compact` (new, unlayered, override type selector)

### Breaking changes
- _(none)_

Detection rule: if git diff --name-only <session-start>..HEAD includes:

• resources/views/components/**/*.blade.php → inspect for new props, removed props, variant additions
• resources/css/app.css (@theme block) → inspect for new/changed/removed tokens
• resources/css/blocks/**/*.css → skip (block-scoped, not shared contract)

Generate the entry by diffing the files; don't ask the user to hand-write it.

6) Milestones auto-save (post-merge)

When finishing-a-development-branch completes (PR merged), append to docs/milestones.md:

# Milestones

## YYYY-MM-DD — v<version> (PR #<number>)

- **Scope:** <1-line PR title>
- **Components delivered:** <list>
- **Architectural patterns validated:** <list>
- **Decisions recorded in:** <spec path>
- **Known follow-ups:** <list or "none">

This survives context compaction and gives future sessions a fast recap of what shipped. Do NOT rely on memory files alone — milestones are commit history with meaning.

Key Principles

• Always re-read assets from disk — context compression will lose design reference
• Verify after each component — catch drift early, not at the end
• Consult reference skills — don't guess patterns, read the reference
• Respect the strategy — autonomous for simple, interactive for complex
• Hooks handle cache — post-edit hook auto-runs lando flush and lando theme-build
• Worktree per component — every component is implemented in an isolated branch+worktree, merged to the feature branch only after visual verification passes
• Zero arbitrary Tailwind values — all colours, fonts, and spacing must be @theme tokens; arbitrary [#hex] classes are a Critical issue caught by visual-verifier

Query First — MCP Integration

Before generating code that references CPTs, fields, routes, or Livewire components:

discover-abilities
execute-ability posts/list-types
execute-ability acf/field-groups

Never invent slugs or field names — always query first when the stack is available. See sageing/references/mcp-query-patterns.md.