Menu
Read-only correctness review with actionable findings first, tight file/line evidence, severity, and a concise residual-risk summary.
Install with Codex or Claude Copy this prompt, paste it into Codex, Claude, or another assistant, and let it review the skill page and install it for you.
Based on SOC occupation classification
| name | review |
| description | Read-only correctness review with actionable findings first, tight file/line evidence, severity, and a concise residual-risk summary. |
| invocation | model+user |
| aliases-for | code-review |
Use for correctness review of a diff, PR, or named change set.
Create or improve codewhale skills. Use when the user wants a new skill, wants to update an existing skill, or needs guidance on when a skill should be a skill versus MCP, hooks, tools, or a plugin scaffold.
Exercise the real app/API/CLI and collect observable evidence; tests alone do not count as end-to-end verification.
Generate a small set of independent candidate solutions in worktrees, judge them against one explicit rubric, and apply the winner only after PASS verification.
Break a large, parallelizable goal into bounded work units, coordinate existing agent/worktree machinery, integrate, and verify. Explicit-only.
Choose and produce an appropriate chart/dashboard/visual explanation from data, with legible encodings and source/assumption notes.
Reproduce, minimize, localize, identify root cause, and distinguish diagnosis from an authorized fix. Prefer root-cause over symptom patches.
