paper-yin-2024-turing-tests-ai-scientist-benchmark

Stars0

Forks0

UpdatedMay 20, 2026 at 04:18

Use when the agent is positioning the consuming agent/manuscript against benchmark literature, borrowing a scientific-discovery-benchmark design pattern, or auditing a benchmark/manuscript claim related to it - central claim is "Seven historically-inspired Turing-style benchmark tests (heliocentric model from celestial observations, laws of motion, vibrating-string ODE, Maxwell's equati" (arXiv preprint 2024).

Installation

Install with Codex or Claude Copy this prompt, paste it into Codex, Claude, or another assistant, and let it review the skill page and install it for you.

Source

huangzesen

huangzesen/heliosi-501-corpus-skill

View GitHub Repository View Creator Repositories

Download

Related occupationsSOC

Based on SOC occupation classification

PhysicistsLife, Physical, and Social Science Occupations·SOC 19-2012

File Explorer

2 files

SKILL.md

readonly

More from this repository

same repository

heliosi-501-corpus

huangzesen/heliosi-501-corpus-skill

Use when the user asks about HelioSI, the heliophysics paper-skill corpus, the 501-skill corpus, paper-to-skill compilation, generating hypotheses or experiments from heliophysics literature, selecting corpus entries by topic (PFSS, open flux, PSP switchbacks, SEPs, turbulence, solar-wind classification, instruments, MHD, agent-runtime design), or deciding which papers to verify against full text.

2026-05-210

hu-2022-deep-swim-cnn-discontinuities

huangzesen/heliosi-501-corpus-skill

Use when running Deep-SWIM, a semi-supervised CNN pipeline that classifies 5-minute Wind/MFI magnetic-field windows (3s-resampled, B_x/B_y/B_z stacked as channels) as discontinuity vs ambient solar wind. Central paper claim: a four-layer 1D-CNN trained with contrastive learning + pseudo-labeling + Online Hard Example Mining (OHEM) reaches AUC ≈ 0.90 on the held-out validation set and precision 0.52 / recall 0.73 / AUC 0.82 on a one-day expert-hand-labelled test set (2018-11-18), under heavy class imbalance (~15 % discontinuity-positive windows). NeurIPS 2021 Machine Learning and the Physical Sciences workshop (Lamdouar et al. 2022, arXiv:2203.01184). Note: the slug retains a legacy first-author placeholder; the verified lead author is Hala Lamdouar (University of Oxford), not Hu.

2026-05-200

katsavrias-2025-periodic-density-structures-solar-orbiter

huangzesen/heliosi-501-corpus-skill

Use when detecting and cataloguing quasi-Periodic Density Structures (PDSs) in Solar Orbiter density data with Multitaper + wavelet, and quantifying their radial-length-scale evolution between 0.3 and 1 au — central claim is slow-wind PDSs expand at ~10% and fast-wind PDSs compress at ~10% across that range (Katsavrias et al. 2025, arXiv:2511.15518; venue TODO verify).

2026-05-200

sasli-2026-ember-modulated-ion-acoustic-wave-ml

huangzesen/heliosi-501-corpus-skill

Use when running EMBER (Electron heating from Modulated Burst-mode Event Recognition) on PSP FIELDS Digital Burst Memory (DBM) voltage waveforms to detect modulated ion-acoustic waves (mIAWs — including triggered IAWs and frequency-dispersed IAWs) and correlate them with anomalous core-electron heating. Central paper claim: an ensemble of 16 background-only anomaly detectors (physics-motivated + classical outlier + deep-learning), run on log-scaled Fourier spectrograms of DBM bursts from PSP Encounters 6–9 and 15, recovers ≈ 93 % of labelled mIAW events at an estimated 1 % FAR on a curated catalog of 42 anomalous + 496 background spectrograms; flagged intervals show core perpendicular T_e above adiabatic cooling and elevated T_e/T_i ratios, reproducing previously reported heating phenomenology without using temperatures in the detection step. Sasli et al. 2026, arXiv:2605.00162, submitted to Earth and Space Science.

2026-05-200

paper-gottweis-2025-ai-co-scientist-multi-agent-gemini

huangzesen/heliosi-501-corpus-skill

Use when the agent is positioning the consuming agent/manuscript against ai-scientist-system literature, borrowing a agent-runtime-async-tournament design pattern, or auditing a benchmark/manuscript claim related to it - central claim is "A multi-agent system on Gemini 2.0 implementing a generate-debate-evolve loop with asynchronous task execution and tournament-style hypothesis evolution improve" (arXiv preprint 2025).

2026-05-200

paper-liweiwu-2026-ai-co-scientist-ranking-search-models

huangzesen/heliosi-501-corpus-skill

Use when the agent is positioning the consuming agent/manuscript against domain-specific-ai-scientist literature, borrowing a agent-runtime-full-pipeline-cloud design pattern, or auditing a benchmark/manuscript claim related to it - central claim is "An AI Co-Scientist framework automates the full search-ranking research pipeline (idea -> code -> GPU training -> analysis) with single-LLM agents for routine t" (arXiv preprint 2026).

2026-05-200

name	paper-yin-2024-turing-tests-ai-scientist-benchmark
description	Use when the agent is positioning the consuming agent/manuscript against benchmark literature, borrowing a scientific-discovery-benchmark design pattern, or auditing a benchmark/manuscript claim related to it - central claim is "Seven historically-inspired Turing-style benchmark tests (heliocentric model from celestial observations, laws of motion, vibrating-string ODE, Maxwell's equati" (arXiv preprint 2024).
version	0.1.0
kind	paper-skill
quality	positioning-skill-not-executable-science
harness_agnostic	true
layers	{"scientific_invariant":true,"executable_protocol":true,"adapter_binding_examples":false,"research_generation_affordance":true}
paper	{"title":"Turing Tests For An AI Scientist","first_author":"Yin, X.","authors":["Xiaoxin Yin"],"year":2024,"venue":"arXiv preprint","doi":null,"arxiv_id":"2405.13352","ads_bibcode":null}
domain	{"primary_theme":"other","secondary_themes":["agent-runtime","scientific-discovery-benchmark"],"missions":[],"regime":[]}
trigger_keywords	["benchmark","scientific-discovery-benchmark","agent-runtime","ai-scientist","positioning","scientific-discovery-evaluation","arxiv:2405.13352"]
data_products	[]
algorithms	[{"name":"Historical-discovery benchmark scenario design"},{"name":"Per-scenario success criterion (recovery of canonical law/model)"},{"name":"Knowledge-isolation protocol (no human-curated answers in context)"}]
validation_target	null
links	{"doi_url":null,"arxiv_url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.13352","ads_url":null,"code_repo":null,"data_repo":null}
claim_boundary	{"scope":"Bounded to seven specific historical-discovery scenarios; passing them is a necessary but not sufficient condition for general scientific autonomy.","out_of_scope":["Do not interpret passing the tests as evidence of broader autonomy.","Do not use as a heliophysics benchmark directly — the celestial test is the closest analogue."]}
failure_modes	["Knowledge-leakage is hard to enforce against modern foundation models.","Scenario count is small; success on seven items not a robust score."]
depends_on	[]
adapter_notes	[]
research_generation_affordances	[{"type":"minimal_experiment","statement":"Adapt the heliocentric-discovery test to heliophysics: give an agent PSP MAG + plasma without context, and check if it independently recovers a published claim from a known paper-skill (e.g. cascade-rate enhancement near the Sun, [[bandyopadhyay-2020-energy-transfer-psp]])."},{"type":"hypothesis","statement":"If HelioSI passes one heliophysics-Turing-style test under knowledge-isolation, this is stronger evidence than passing a HeurekaBench-style end-to-end test, because the canonical-law-recovery criterion is harder to game."}]
provenance	{"generated_by":"HelioSI paper-to-skill factory (Claude Opus 4.7) - wave500_agent_runtime_eval_design_045","generated_at":"2026-05-18T00:00:00Z","source_record":"sioulas-reproduction/results/paper_skill_corpus/wave500_agent_runtime_eval_design_045/manifest.json and sioulas-reproduction/results/agent_runtime_paper_scan_raw.md / agent_runtime_2026_only_synthesis.md (arxiv:2405.13352, doi:n/a)","verified_by":null,"verified_at":null}
tags	["agent-runtime","paper-skill","positioning","ai-scientist","scientific-discovery-evaluation"]

Turing Tests For An AI Scientist - paper-skill (wave500)

Skill type: positioning / evaluation / design-pattern-extractor. This is NOT a heliophysics method. Loaded by the HelioSI runtime (or any agent harness) to (a) audit manuscript/benchmark/positioning claims, (b) reuse design patterns from non-heliophysics AI-scientist work, and (c) seed research-generation affordances for heliophysics-specific runtime upgrades. See §9 for the Layer-4 affordances.

Source type: scientific-discovery-evaluation. Executable status: benchmark-protocol-template.

1. Trigger (Layer 1)

Invoke this skill when an agent (HelioSI manuscript writer, benchmark designer, runtime architect, or any other harness consumer) is:

drafting/revising HelioSI manuscript sections that compare against benchmark systems
designing a HelioSI benchmark or evaluation that should reflect the scientific-discovery-benchmark pattern
deciding whether a HelioSI subsystem should borrow this paper's design choices or explicitly reject them

Do NOT use this skill as a heliophysics data-pipeline component - it has no data_products[] and no executable scientific workflow over mission data.

2. Paper claim -> verifiable task (Layer 1)

Claim (narrow form). Seven historically-inspired Turing-style benchmark tests (heliocentric model from celestial observations, laws of motion, vibrating-string ODE, Maxwell's equations from EM simulations, etc.) constitute a benchmark family for AI-scientist discovery without reliance on human-curated knowledge.

Verifiable task. A reproduction of this skill's positioning value succeeds when an agent restates the claim above with the claim_boundary.scope bounds intact, refuses overclaims listed in §7, and emits the §9 Layer-4 affordances in a form a graph walker can consume.

3. Methods / equations -> executable protocol (Layer 2, abstract)

Each item below is the paper's method as an abstract capability the runtime would need to reproduce or borrow the design pattern. No specific runtime (LingTai, Claude Code, an MCP server) is named here - those belong in §8 / adapter_notes[], which are intentionally empty for this wave500 batch.

Method 1: Historical-discovery benchmark scenario design

Paper role: explicit named method/component of the paper's contribution.
Abstract procedure: the runtime that wants to borrow this pattern must be able to (a) instantiate the component as a callable, (b) feed it the manuscript/benchmark/sibling-skill inputs from §4, and (c) emit an artifact a Layer-4 affordance can reference.

Method 2: Per-scenario success criterion (recovery of canonical law/model)

Paper role: explicit named method/component of the paper's contribution.
Abstract procedure: the runtime that wants to borrow this pattern must be able to (a) instantiate the component as a callable, (b) feed it the manuscript/benchmark/sibling-skill inputs from §4, and (c) emit an artifact a Layer-4 affordance can reference.

Method 3: Knowledge-isolation protocol (no human-curated answers in context)

Paper role: explicit named method/component of the paper's contribution.
Abstract procedure: the runtime that wants to borrow this pattern must be able to (a) instantiate the component as a callable, (b) feed it the manuscript/benchmark/sibling-skill inputs from §4, and (c) emit an artifact a Layer-4 affordance can reference.

4. Data / instruments -> abstract tool contracts (Layer 2, abstract)

This paper is a positioning / evaluation / design-pattern source, not a heliophysics-data workflow. The "data" the skill consumes is the HelioSI manuscript draft, benchmark spec, runtime architecture description, or sibling paper-skills.

Input artifact	Role	Capability requirement
HelioSI manuscript draft (`heliosi_manuscript_draft.md`)	Target of positioning checklist	Filesystem read
HelioSI benchmark spec	Target of benchmark-design template	Filesystem read
Sibling paper-skills (this corpus)	Source of cross-references	Skill-catalog read
External paper (DOI/arXiv)	Source for full-text verification (currently TODO)	Web fetch (optional)

5. Validation target -> benchmark artifact (Layer 2)

Not benchmarked yet - this is a positioning-skill-not-executable-science entry. Promotion requires either (a) a manuscript-coverage audit artifact, (b) a benchmark-construction prototype, or (c) a Layer-3 adapter that wires the design pattern into HelioSI and runs it end-to-end on a heliophysics test case.

6. Failure modes -> skill memory (Layer 1)

Pitfalls a future agent applying this skill must remember:

Knowledge-leakage is hard to enforce against modern foundation models.
Scenario count is small; success on seven items not a robust score.

7. Claim boundary (Layer 1)

In scope. Bounded to seven specific historical-discovery scenarios; passing them is a necessary but not sufficient condition for general scientific autonomy.

Out of scope - do NOT generalize beyond:

Do not interpret passing the tests as evidence of broader autonomy.
Do not use as a heliophysics benchmark directly — the celestial test is the closest analogue.

If a downstream task asks for a generalization listed above, refuse it and return a reference to a sibling paper-skill that covers it (or report none).

8. Links and adapter binding examples (Layer 3, optional)

DOI: n/a
arXiv: arXiv:2405.13352
ADS: n/a
Code: n/a
Data: n/a

Adapter notes intentionally empty for this batch - the skill remains executable from §3-§5 alone on any agent harness that supports filesystem reads + skill-catalog walks.

9. Skill graph + research-generation affordances (Layer 4 and graph edges)

Skill graph (depends_on edges).

No paper-skill dependencies (self-contained positioning/design-pattern source).

Research-generation affordances - how this paper helps HelioSI (or any heliophysics agent) generate or evaluate new scientific ideas:

Minimal_experiment - Adapt the heliocentric-discovery test to heliophysics: give an agent PSP MAG + plasma without context, and check if it independently recovers a published claim from a known paper-skill (e.g. cascade-rate enhancement near the Sun, [[bandyopadhyay-2020-energy-transfer-psp]]). Related: n/a.
Hypothesis - If HelioSI passes one heliophysics-Turing-style test under knowledge-isolation, this is stronger evidence than passing a HeurekaBench-style end-to-end test, because the canonical-law-recovery criterion is harder to game. Related: n/a.

Notes

This SKILL.md is a wave500_agent_runtime_eval_design_045 batch entry. It is harness-agnostic by construction; do not bind it to a specific runtime without converting Layer-3 adapter_notes[] to populated.
The provenance.source_record field points to the inventory anchor used to write this skill; full-text verification of all identifiers is pending and any TODO_verify_with_full_text token must be resolved before promoting past stub tier.