Run any Skill in Manus with one click

review

Stars24

Forks6

UpdatedMarch 31, 2026 at 20:49

Run a Codex review from Claude Code against the current uncommitted work, a base branch diff, or a specific commit. Use when the user explicitly asks for a Codex review or second reviewer.

Installation

Install with Codex or Claude Copy this prompt, paste it into Codex, Claude, or another assistant, and let it review the skill page and install it for you.

Run Skill in Manus

Source

IgorGanapolsky

IgorGanapolsky/ThumbGate

View GitHub Repository View Creator Repositories

Download

Run Skill in Manus

Related occupationsSOC

Based on SOC occupation classification

Software Quality Assurance Analysts and TestersComputer and Mathematical Occupations·SOC 15-1253

SKILL.md

readonly

name	review
description	Run a Codex review from Claude Code against the current uncommitted work, a base branch diff, or a specific commit. Use when the user explicitly asks for a Codex review or second reviewer.

Review

When this skill is invoked, translate the request into one of these bridge calls:

default: current uncommitted work
base=<branch>: compare against a branch such as main
commit=<sha>: review one commit

Prefer these forms:

node "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/codex-bridge.js" review --uncommitted
node "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/codex-bridge.js" review --base main
node "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/codex-bridge.js" review --commit <sha>

If the user gave a focus area, pass it as --prompt "...".

After the bridge returns:

summarize the highest-signal findings
mention the saved artifact path if the user may want to inspect the raw result
do not pretend Codex found issues if the result says no issues

More from this repository

same repository

thumbgate

IgorGanapolsky/ThumbGate

ThumbGate provides pre-action gates for AI coding agents. It captures thumbs-up/down feedback on agent actions, auto-promotes repeated failures into prevention rules, and blocks known-bad tool calls via PreToolUse hooks. Trigger when the user wants to add safety guardrails to an AI agent workflow, capture structured feedback on agent output, generate prevention rules from failure patterns, gate high-risk actions before execution, or export DPO training pairs from production feedback. Works with any MCP-compatible agent including Cursor, Codex, Gemini CLI, Amp, and OpenCode.

2026-07-1724

thumbgate-brand-voice

IgorGanapolsky/ThumbGate

Make any ThumbGate-facing copy — landing/pricing/compare/guide pages, README, postinstall banners, CLI receipts, Reddit/LinkedIn/Bluesky/Threads posts, docs, outreach drafts, blog/launch content — sound like ThumbGate: direct, technical, honest, anti-hype. Use BEFORE writing or editing customer-facing or marketing text, and when the user says "write a landing page", "draft a Reddit/LinkedIn post", "write the README", "make this on-brand", "punch up this copy", or "review this copy for voice". Do NOT use for code comments, commit messages, internal notes, or non-ThumbGate copy — and never to add fabricated traction or unsupported claims (honesty is the brand).

2026-06-1224

thumbgate-feedback

IgorGanapolsky/ThumbGate

Capture thumbs up/down feedback into structured memories and prevention rules. Require one sentence of why before claiming memory promotion. Use when user gives explicit quality signals about agent work (e.g. "that worked", "that failed", "thumbs up/down"). Do NOT use for general questions, code generation, file operations, or any task that is not explicit feedback on prior agent output.

2026-06-1224

agent-memory

IgorGanapolsky/ThumbGate

Give your agent persistent cross-session memory — recall what went wrong on similar tasks before starting, then capture whether the work succeeded or failed so repeated mistakes auto-promote into prevention rules. Runs locally via the ThumbGate MCP server (recall, capture_feedback, prevention_rules, feedback_stats) — no API key needed. Use when the user says "recall", "what went wrong last time", "remember this for next time", "capture feedback", "thumbs up/down on that", or at the start of a new task or session. Do NOT use when the user wants to force one specific mistake into an enforced block gate (use the thumbgate-guard skill), to list rules that already exist (thumbgate-rules), or to check ThumbGate wiring (thumbgate-doctor).

2026-06-1124

solve-architecture-autonomy

IgorGanapolsky/ThumbGate

Course-correct from over-planning to execution — when the agent has produced a plan, research, or options instead of doing work the user already approved, drop the analysis and execute the smallest end-to-end action now (branch, run, deploy, verify). Use when the user says "stop planning, just do it", "why are you researching, execute", "just ship it", "enough analysis", or pushes back that you keep proposing instead of acting on an already-decided task. Do NOT use when the task is genuinely undecided and needs a plan first, when the user explicitly asked for research/options/a design, or for routine work where no over-planning has occurred — acting on an unscoped or destructive task is its own failure.

2026-06-1124

thumbgate-blocked

IgorGanapolsky/ThumbGate

Show ThumbGate's enforcement record — how many risky actions were actually blocked versus warned, which gates fire most, the tokens/damage saved, and the full feedback to check to rejection pipeline. Reads live enforcement counters via the gate_stats and enforcement_matrix MCP tools (CLI fallback `npx thumbgate gate-stats`). Use when the user says "what has ThumbGate blocked", "show gate stats", "is enforcement working", "how many tokens did we save", "show the enforcement matrix", or "what got stopped". Do NOT use to list rule DEFINITIONS that exist (use the thumbgate-rules skill), to create a new rule (use the thumbgate-guard skill), or to check whether ThumbGate is installed and wired (use the thumbgate-doctor skill).

2026-06-1124

name	review
description	Run a Codex review from Claude Code against the current uncommitted work, a base branch diff, or a specific commit. Use when the user explicitly asks for a Codex review or second reviewer.

Review

When this skill is invoked, translate the request into one of these bridge calls:

default: current uncommitted work
base=<branch>: compare against a branch such as main
commit=<sha>: review one commit

Prefer these forms:

node "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/codex-bridge.js" review --uncommitted
node "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/codex-bridge.js" review --base main
node "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/codex-bridge.js" review --commit <sha>

If the user gave a focus area, pass it as --prompt "...".

After the bridge returns:

summarize the highest-signal findings
mention the saved artifact path if the user may want to inspect the raw result
do not pretend Codex found issues if the result says no issues