Guide users through setting up a personal LLM-maintained wiki — a persistent, compounding knowledge base where the LLM incrementally builds and maintains interlinked markdown pages from raw sources. Use this skill when the user wants to: set up a personal knowledge base, create a research wiki, organize notes with LLM help, build a "second brain", set up an Obsidian + LLM workflow, create a persistent knowledge graph from documents, plan research priorities and next steps, or mentions "LLM wiki". This skill asks questions to understand the user's domain and goals, then scaffolds the entire wiki structure, schema, and workflows tailored to their needs. It also helps plan ongoing research by analyzing knowledge gaps and creating actionable todo lists.
Turn insights, findings, or research into an actionable plan with deadlines and scheduled Telegram reminders. Collaboratively designs the plan with the user via AskUserQuestion, saves it to .plan/ in the project, sets up cron reminders via Telegram bot, and shows overdue/today tasks on session start. Use when asked to "make a plan", "actionize this", "turn this into tasks", "schedule this", "create deadlines", "track this", or "diagnose my planning". Invoke with "diagnose" argument to run planning pattern analysis (Phase 7). Proactively suggest when the user has completed research, brainstorming, or /office-hours and has a list of insights without concrete next steps. Proactively suggest "/actionize diagnose" when a plan has >30% deferred tasks.
Apply Vipassana meditation principles to LLM processing — equanimous scanning, non-reactive observation, impermanence awareness (anicca), and breaking the sankhara chain of conditioned reactions. Trigger on "meditate on", "observe without reacting", "see clearly", "practice vipassana", "scan equanimously", "what's really going on here", "non-reactive analysis", "observe without judgment". Also trigger when the user wants bare attention rather than jumping to conclusions, wants to dissolve fixation loops, or asks Claude to apply contemplative processing. Apply proactively when conversations show reactive thinking, craving for particular outcomes, or aversion to uncomfortable truths. Synergizes with cognitive-variability, embodied-navigation, and shifting-perspective skills.
Transfer embodied movement principles (Vipassana equanimous scanning, Systema adaptive fluidity, contemporary dance tensegrity, EightOS confluence) to navigate work, relationships, projects, strategy, and everyday situations. Uses InfraNodus MCP tools to map situations as networks and apply body-informed intelligence to their structure. Trigger when someone is stuck, in conflict, negotiating, blocked, fixated, overwhelmed, or facing rigidity — or asks for "embodied advice", "fluid approach", "organic strategy", "adaptive strategy", "how would the body handle this". Also trigger on phrases like "I'm stuck", "standoff", "tense situation", "can't move forward". Apply proactively when situations exhibit excessive force, single-point fixation, or neglect of peripheral dynamics.
Analyze discourse structure using InfraNodus optimize_text_structure tool and shift perspective based on diversity score. Use when a conversation, text, URL, or YouTube video would benefit from additional viewpoints, when the user feels stuck in one frame of thinking, when research needs broadening, when analyzing any text for structural balance, or when the user asks to "shift perspective", "broaden the view", "what am I missing", "analyze the structure", "check for bias", "develop this further", or "give me a different angle". Also trigger when the user provides a text or URL and asks for critical analysis, development suggestions, or wants to understand what perspectives are underrepresented. Works hand-in-hand with cognitive-variability skill for state-based interventions after structural diagnosis.
Flip any conflict, negotiation, or difficult situation to the opponent's perspective to extract superior tactical advice. Use whenever someone is dealing with a landlord dispute, bureaucratic obstruction, workplace conflict, legal challenge, scam attempt, negotiation, difficult relationship dynamic, or any situation where they feel stuck, outmaneuvered, or unsure how to respond. Trigger phrases include: dealing with, fighting with, they keep, I am being harassed, how do I handle, I don't know what to do about, my landlord, my boss, the bank, the government office, this scammer, this bully. Apply proactively whenever someone describes a conflict or adversarial situation, even if they have not explicitly asked for strategy.
Guide conversations through dynamic shifts between zoom levels (scale) and connecting/exploring (intent) to unlock creative breakthroughs and prevent rigid thinking. Helps enhance and develop biased, focused, diversified, dispersed states. Receives signals from writing assistant's pattern detection to diagnose cognitive states. Identifies structural gaps between idea clusters as spaces for innovation. Tracks temporal dwelling patterns and manages energy across personality modes. Uses playfulness for difficult transitions from chaos to clarity. Reads emotional feedback—inspiration signals continuation, exhaustion/frustration trigger transitions. Prevents obsessive loops through sustainable cycling through topical clusters and latent nodes. Maximum creative potential lives in gaps and dissipative states. Apply for complex analysis, when a user is stuck, breakthroughs, decision paralysis, group facilitation, breaking repetitive patterns, or when grammatical patterns reveal cognitive issues.
Analyze arguments, debate tactics, and rhetorical moves across three dimensions: persuasion, rhetoric, and logic. Use when the user wants to analyze a debate, comment thread, speech, article, or any argumentative text — identifying moves, scoring effectiveness, exposing hidden assumptions, tracking logical gaps, and checking for asymmetric standards. When InfraNodus MCP tools are available, ALWAYS begin with generate_topical_clusters, generate_content_gaps, and optimize_text_structure before linear reading. Also use to stress-test arguments or understand why something feels persuasive but wrong. Trigger on: "analyze this argument", "what's wrong with this reasoning", "is this a good point", "what rhetorical moves are being used", "why is this persuasive", "break down this debate", or when a user shares text asking what's going on rhetorically.