sf-debug

name	sf-debug
description	Salesforce debug log analysis and troubleshooting with 100-point scoring. TRIGGER when: user analyzes debug logs, hits governor limits, reads stack traces, or touches .log files from Salesforce orgs. DO NOT TRIGGER when: running Apex tests (use sf-testing), fixing Apex code (use sf-apex), or Agentforce session tracing (use sf-ai-agentforce-observability).
license	MIT
metadata	{"version":"1.1.0","author":"Jag Valaiyapathy","scoring":"100 points across 5 categories"}

sf-debug: Salesforce Debug Log Analysis & Troubleshooting

Use this skill when the user needs root-cause analysis from debug logs: governor-limit diagnosis, stack-trace interpretation, slow-query investigation, heap / CPU pressure analysis, or a reproduction-to-fix loop based on log evidence.

When This Skill Owns the Task

Use sf-debug when the work involves:

• .log files from Salesforce
• stack traces and exception analysis
• governor limits
• SOQL / DML / CPU / heap troubleshooting
• query-plan or performance evidence extracted from logs

Delegate elsewhere when the user is:

• running or repairing Apex tests → sf-testing
• implementing the code fix → sf-apex
• debugging Agentforce session traces / parquet telemetry → sf-ai-agentforce-observability

---

Required Context to Gather First

Ask for or infer:

• org alias
• failing transaction / user flow / test name
• approximate timestamp or transaction window
• user / record / request ID if known
• whether the goal is diagnosis only or diagnosis + fix loop

---

Recommended Workflow

1. Retrieve logs

sf apex list log --target-org <alias> --json
sf apex get log --log-id <id> --target-org <alias>
sf apex tail log --target-org <alias> --color

2. Analyze in this order

1. entry point and transaction type
2. exceptions / fatal errors
3. governor limits
4. repeated SOQL / DML patterns
5. CPU / heap hotspots
6. callout timing and external failures

3. Classify severity

• Critical — runtime failure, hard limit, corruption risk
• Warning — near-limit, non-selective query, slow path
• Info — optimization opportunity or hygiene issue

4. Recommend the smallest correct fix

Prefer fixes that are:

• root-cause oriented
• bulk-safe
• testable
• easy to verify with a rerun

Expanded workflow: references/analysis-playbook.md

---

High-Signal Issue Patterns

Issue	Primary signal	Default fix direction
SOQL in loop	repeating SOQL_EXECUTE_BEGIN in a repeated call path	query once, use maps / grouped collections
DML in loop	repeated DML_BEGIN patterns	collect rows, bulk DML once
Non-selective query	high rows scanned / poor selectivity	add indexed filters, reduce scope
CPU pressure	CPU usage approaching sync limit	reduce algorithmic complexity, cache, async where valid
Heap pressure	heap usage approaching sync limit	stream with SOQL for-loops, reduce in-memory data
Null pointer / fatal error	EXCEPTION_THROWN / FATAL_ERROR	guard null assumptions, fix empty-query handling

Expanded examples: references/common-issues.md

---

Output Format

When finishing analysis, report in this order:

1. What failed
2. Where it failed (class / method / line / transaction stage)
3. Why it failed (root cause, not just symptom)
4. How severe it is
5. Recommended fix
6. Verification step

Suggested shape:

Issue: <summary>
Location: <class / line / transaction>
Root cause: <explanation>
Severity: Critical | Warning | Info
Fix: <specific action>
Verify: <test or rerun step>

---

Cross-Skill Integration

Need	Delegate to	Reason
Implement Apex fix	sf-apex	code change generation / review
Reproduce via tests	sf-testing	test execution and coverage loop
Deploy fix	sf-deploy	deployment orchestration
Create debugging data	sf-data	targeted seed / repro data

---

Reference Map

Start here

• references/analysis-playbook.md
• references/common-issues.md
• references/cli-commands.md

Deep references

• references/debug-log-reference.md
• references/log-analysis-tools.md
• references/benchmarking-guide.md

Rubric

• references/scoring-rubric.md

---

Score Guide

Score	Meaning
90+	Expert analysis with strong fix guidance
80–89	Good analysis with minor gaps
70–79	Acceptable but may miss secondary issues
60–69	Partial diagnosis only
< 60	Incomplete analysis