Run any intervention-lifecycle work (the application umbrella). Use `/haipipe-application enter <intervention-path>` or `status` to preload an open-needs dashboard from STATUS.md, 0-lifecycle, 0-artifacts, 1-rounds, and git state. Application lifecycle owns intervention-specific story, the stage-1 evidence ladder (1a-descriptions -> 1b-themes -> 1c-claims -> 1d-advice), narrative, displays, artifact text, maturity, and dated work rounds; the venue (sms/email/dashboard/report/...) gates which stages fire and how deep claims must settle; open evidence questions are RAISED as entries in the flat probe pool 1-probes/PPNN_<topic>/, and each stage's PROBE phase (haipipe-application-probe) binds them to answers in the task/discovery bank through a clean collector agent โ never calling the bank directly. Trigger: application, intervention, enter, status, seed, ladder, descriptions, themes, claims, advice, venue, pitch, narrative, display, section-edit, draft, sms, message, email, dashboard, report, review, deploy, it
Install with Codex or Claude Copy this prompt, paste it into Codex, Claude, or another assistant, and let it review the skill page and install it for you.
A direct command skips the review prompt. Inspect the source before running it.
Run any intervention-lifecycle work (the application umbrella). Use `/haipipe-application enter <intervention-path>` or `status` to preload an open-needs dashboard from STATUS.md, 0-lifecycle, 0-artifacts, 1-rounds, and git state. Application lifecycle owns intervention-specific story, the stage-1 evidence ladder (1a-descriptions -> 1b-themes -> 1c-claims -> 1d-advice), narrative, displays, artifact text, maturity, and dated work rounds; the venue (sms/email/dashboard/report/...) gates which stages fire and how deep claims must settle; open evidence questions are RAISED as entries in the flat probe pool 1-probes/PPNN_<topic>/, and each stage's PROBE phase (haipipe-application-probe) binds them to answers in the task/discovery bank through a clean collector agent โ never calling the bank directly. Trigger: application, intervention, enter, status, seed, ladder, descriptions, themes, claims, advice, venue, pitch, narrative, display, section-edit, draft, sms, message, email, dashboard, report, review, deploy, iterate, round, probe, /haipipe-application.
{"version":"0.6.10","last_updated":"2026-07-19","summary":"Front door for the intervention lifecycle: parse intent (venue + stage), route to the stage specialists. Each stage runs four phases (draft โ probe โ revise โ check); the intervention RAISES evidence questions as entries in the flat pool 1-probes/, and each stage's PROBE phase binds them to answers in the task/discovery bank through a clean agent โ never calling the bank directly. The venue gates which stages fire and how deep claims settle; the 1aโ1d ladder (DโIโKโW) is the venue-free evidence spine. History: ./CHANGELOG.md."}
Skill: haipipe-application (orchestrator)
User-facing entry for the intervention lifecycle. The application lifecycle is a delivery owner: it owns this intervention's story, claims, narrative, displays, artifact text, maturity, and dated work rounds. Project-level evidence lives outside the intervention in discoveries and tasks; when a stage hits a gap, record a delivery need (the Delivery Need Routing section below) and route to the evidence worker.
This orchestrator parses intent and dispatches to stage/specialist skills via Skill(). Stage skills internally drive the DPRC phase workers (2-phase/); users and this router never invoke phase skills directly. PROBE ends with a VERIFY step (the probe worker's deterministic probe-file checker), and CHECK runs checks.sh plus re-runs the probe-file checker as the gate's teeth. Canonical structure: ../README.md at the application skill root (skill tree, stage-to-procedure map, router rule).
There is no discover or task verb: reaching the bank is the PROBE phase's job, not the intervention's. A standalone utility question a human wants (a quick lit scan, a data check) goes to the bank's OWN door โ /haipipe-task qa or /haipipe-discovery qa โ typed by a person, never proxied by the intervention.
ALWAYS read and honor PREFERENCES.md (this skill's own folder): portable, git-tracked global behavioral preferences that survive a machine change. digest / feedback append flagged global prefs there (merge-or-create).
Verbs
One block: verb, aliases and trigger keywords, then where it goes.
enter | status | dashboard | preload -> haipipe-application-enter (open-needs console; GET-OR-CREATE: a missing path offers to scaffold the intervention first; also "enter intervention", "new intervention")
venue | format | modality | channel -> haipipe-application-venue (recommend + pin; sms/push/reminder/checklist/email/dashboard/ui-card/report all land here; pin writes venue + stages_skipped + claims_settlement into STATUS.md AND produces 0-lifecycle/2-venue/2-venue.md with Artifact Principles โ the downstream contract pitch/display/section-edit read)
seed -> haipipe-application-lifecycle seed (also "opportunity", "why might this work", "kill criteria")
ladder -> haipipe-application-lifecycle ladder (composite: runs 1a->1d as one sweep with venue-scaled gate batching; also "evidence ladder", "stage 1")
descriptions | describe -> haipipe-application-lifecycle descriptions (rung 1a; also "data profile", "how does the data look", "cohort size", "refresh D<n>")
themes | theme -> haipipe-application-lifecycle themes (rung 1b; also "topic space", "what patterns emerge", "thematic")
claims | claim | ledger -> haipipe-application-lifecycle claims (rung 1c; also "what must be true", "what generalizes", "claim gap", "supported", "GAP")
advice | advise | recommendation -> haipipe-application-lifecycle advice (rung 1d, the ladder's deliverable; also "design advice", "social norms", "what should the message do", "principles" (legacy))
pitch -> haipipe-application-lifecycle pitch (also "goal", "one-sentence story", "theory of change")
narrative | arc | structure -> haipipe-application-lifecycle narrative
display | elements | panels | widgets -> haipipe-application-lifecycle display (also "content plan", "unit jobs" โ the retired minimap concern lives here)
section-edit | section | sec | ยงN -> haipipe-application-lifecycle section-edit (sectioned venues only)
draft | write | create | generate | make -> haipipe-application-artifact (compose 0-artifacts/<slug>-v{N}.md from the venue profile + lifecycle stages; "draft the SMS", "make the email")
review | check artifact | compliance -> haipipe-application-review
claim-audit | verify claims -> haipipe-application-claim-audit
deploy | ship | go live -> haipipe-application-deploy
round | rounds -> haipipe-application-round (dated work rounds; also "todo", "decisions", "applied")
iterate | A/B | performance -> haipipe-application-iterate
probe ["<question>"] | probe | probe run [PPNN] -> the flat probe pool 1-probes/PPNN_<topic>/, one file per TOPIC, one `## QX<n>` ENTRY per q-executor (RAISE a question / SHOW the board / RUN the five-step loop; "run" hands the pool to haipipe-application-probe, the single door to the bank; also "evidence gap", "verify claim", "hypothesis")
feedback "<text>" | feedback list|move -> fn/feedback.md (resolve BEFORE other parsing)
digest [session] [--dry-run] -> fn/digest.md (resolve BEFORE other parsing)
"<natural language>" -> infer via the keywords above, dispatch
Examples:
/haipipe-application enter "examples/Project-SMSR/applications/interventions/03_refill_reminder"
/haipipe-application venue "timing-aware refill nudge for patients" --no-pin
/haipipe-application claims
/haipipe-application probe "C2: timing matters for refill response"
/haipipe-application probe run PP01
/haipipe-application draft
Routing
Resolution order (first match wins):
1. feedback / digest first-token -> run the fn (before any other parsing)
2. first positional matches a verb/alias -> that target
3. keyword scan over the whole phrase -> per the trigger keywords in the Verbs block; a named venue/modality anywhere -> venue
4. no args, cwd inside an intervention root -> enter "."
5. no args, no intervention root -> chooser (below)
6. input but target unclear -> ASK; NEVER silently default a venue (venue gates stages, settlement depth, and artifact shape โ expensive to redo)
An intervention root is any directory upward containing STATUS.md, 0-lifecycle/, or 0-artifacts/.
Venue coupling (drives two routing rules): seed + the evidence ladder (1a-descriptions/1b-themes/1c-claims/1d-advice) are venue-FREE; venue pins the modality in STATUS.md between the ladder and pitch (writing | venue |, | stages_skipped |, and | claims_settlement | rows) and writes 0-lifecycle/2-venue/2-venue.md with Artifact Principles (channel-HOW โ distinct from 1d's design advice, content-WHAT); pitch/narrative/display/section-edit are venue-ALIGNED and read those Artifact Principles (consulting venue/venue-<name> only for detail beyond them). So: "application" with the ladder gated but no venue pinned -> run venue before pitch. Re-targeting ("turn this into a dashboard") -> re-run venue; pitch re-couples; the ladder stays unchanged, only its REQUIRED SETTLEMENT deepens or relaxes.
Dispatch notes (only where non-obvious; everything else is Skill("haipipe-application-<target>") or Skill("haipipe-application-lifecycle", args="<verb> ...")):
enter Path exists -> Skill("haipipe-application-enter", args="<path>"). Path MISSING -> get-or-create:
CONFIRM FIRST (never create off a typo). Interventions are plain folders (no repo backing):
scaffold STATUS.md + 0-lifecycle/ + 0-artifacts/ + 1-rounds/ + 1-probes/ under
the project's applications/interventions/<NN>_<slug>/, then continue straight into the console.
claims Ladder-virgin guard (JL-agreed thread B, 2026-07-09): if 1a/1b docs are absent, do not
silently dispatch 1c -- offer the choice: "1a/1b are empty; run `ladder` for the sweep,
or 1c anyway?" A non-virgin ladder dispatches 1c directly.
probe Operates on the flat cross-stage pool (1-probes/PPNN_<topic>/; the README board is derived
from it). "<text>" RAISES a question as a SECTION in the right topic's file, no args SHOWS the
board, "run [PPNN]" -> Skill("haipipe-application-probe", args="from-buffer <intervention_root> [PPNN]").
It is the SAME operation at two scopes: this umbrella verb works the WHOLE pool, while a stage's
PROBE phase works only its own slice -- the sections whose serves: names that stage. Both go
through the one worker, haipipe-application-probe, which runs the five-step loop MATCH-before-
DISPATCH and is the ONLY thing that touches the bank. A claim's status lands in 1c-claims.md,
never in a probe file. Anatomy + model: fn/probes.md.
After dispatch, capture the specialist's structured tail (status / summary / artifacts / next) and present it.
Closing Block (end every reply)
THE single source of truth for the closing block and the focus strip in application sessions (mirrors paper's Closing Block; every stage / enter skill inherits this section). In an intervention session, END every reply with ONE fenced text block: a titled top rule carrying ๐ฏ application ยท <active-stage> ๐ฅ, a two-line simplified tail, a plain bottom rule, then the TWO-LINE focus strip (stage + phase):
Markers: ๐ฅ active now (what this session works on) ยท ๐ frontier (farthest the intervention has ever reached) ยท โ done (Gate-Ledger-approved; venue slot: pinned) ยท โฌ not started ยท -- skipped by the pinned venue. Rules: EXACTLY one ๐ฅ and EXACTLY one ๐ per line, never zero -- "reached" means entered, not completed, so a virgin intervention working its first phase renders draft ๐ฅ๐; they split only on loopback (the frontier slot keeps ๐ while ๐ฅ moves back) and collapse to ๐ฅ๐ when they land on the same slot; the phase line always describes the ๐ฅ stage's DPRC phases. Venue-skipped stages render -- and can never carry ๐ฅ or ๐.
Render the stage line DETERMINISTICALLY with the helper (never hand-type it; it drifts): sh "${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR:-.}/stage-strip.sh" <intervention-dir> [<session-stage>] (the script lives IN this skill folder, next to this spec; it reads | current_layer |, | venue |, | stages_skipped |, and the Gate Ledger from STATUS.md). The phase line is rendered by the ๐ฅ stage's skill from its own DPRC progress.
Gate-aware: advancing current_layer requires an EXPLICIT approval action that the current stage is done (the Stage Gate Protocol section below) -- by the human (copilot mode) or by the check worker's persona standing in (autopilot/unattended modes); once STATUS.md carries the gate ledger, โ means "approved", and the ledger records who approved.
Stage Gate Protocol
THE single source of truth for stage gates across the application family (every stage / phase skill inherits this section). A stage is only "done" when it is EXPLICITLY approved. The system must never auto-advance. This is the user-control mechanism for the intervention lifecycle. Application rewrite of the paper family's gate protocol; the venue scales the gate's DEPTH, never its existence.
Gate protocol (per-stage loop)
Produce the stage artifact through DRAFT โ PROBE โ REVISE (../2-phase/ workers). The PROBE phase ends with a VERIFY step: check-probe-cards.sh FAILs cards left planned|dispatched|failed, dangling refs, and harvest: OWED lane debts.
Present exit criteria with per-item check/fail marks (per-stage table: ../2-phase/3-check/haipipe-application-check/SKILL.md).
ASK "Stage looks ready -- confirm to close and move to ?"
Only on explicit approval: write the Gate Ledger row and update STATUS.md current_layer to the next non-skipped stage.
The system STOPS at step 3 and WAITS. No next-stage work until approved.
Venue-scaled depth
simple venues (sms/push/reminder) INLINE gate: exit criteria as one short
checklist in the reply; user's "ok" approves
medium venues (checklist/email) INLINE by default; full report on request
complex venues (dashboard/ui-card/ FULL gate: complete CHECK report (criteria +
report) evidence spot-checks + flags) before the ask
Depth changes the REPORT, not the rule: every stage still ends with an explicit approval and a ledger row.
Ladder gate batching (stage-1 family)
The evidence ladder (1a-descriptions -> 1b-themes -> 1c-claims -> 1d-advice) batches its gates by venue depth -- approval is batched, never skipped, and every rung still gets its own ledger row:
light ONE combined inline gate at 1d covering all four rungs;
one approval writes four ledger rows
medium combined gate at 1c (covers 1a-1c) + own gate at 1d
full four individual gates, one per rung
Venue unpinned (the normal case -- the ladder is venue-FREE and runs before the pin): apply light batching provisionally; a later pin to a deeper venue re-opens only the GATE (re-present criteria at the deeper bar), not the content.
Within the ladder, a rung's CHECK routes like any gate: approve advances to the next rung (1c โ 1d); revise reruns the same rung; upstream symptoms loop back (1c โ 1a for stale/missing data, 1c โ 1b for a wrong theme) per the loopback rule. Whatever the batching, the ladder EXITS to venue only through the 1d gate.
Rounds within a rung (the breadth/depth contract)
REVISE ends with a self-assessment -- did this round surface anything new? If yes, another DRAFT->PROBE->REVISE lap runs BEFORE CHECK ([ROUND n] in the rung's _LOG); CHECK fires only when a round comes up dry. Venue-scaled round depth: light -- one round suffices unless the rung self-assesses a blocker; medium -- loop-until-dry on 1c; full -- loop-until-dry on every rung. Mid-phase back-routing ([ROUTE -> <rung>]) files the upstream slot/card immediately and never waits for a gate -- rounds are internal; only CHECK involves the user. And the gate itself is a lens: at a GROW-loop rung's CHECK the user is asked which data topics are still missing; a grow verdict converts the answers to new slots + planned probes and re-opens DRAFT as [ROUND n+1] -- approve means saturated AND the user added nothing.
Mechanical teeth
The gate is not prose-only. Before the ask, the check worker (../2-phase/3-check/haipipe-application-check) runs two deterministic checkers, and any FAIL blocks the gate from going green:
check-probe-cards.sh (re-run of the probe worker's VERIFY step): a status: planned card or a harvest: OWED lane at the gate means a probe that never ran โ FAIL.
Findings are seeded as > CHECK: threads in the STAGE DOCS only; 0-artifacts/*.md stay clean because the artifact IS the deliverable text โ artifact-level findings go to the Gate Ledger Notes column instead.
Confirmation Ledger in STATUS.md
STATUS.md carries a Gate Ledger -- one row per stage:
| Stage | Confirmed | Date | By | Notes |
|-------|-----------|------|----|-------|
| seed | yes | 2026-07-06 | JL | kill criteria set |
| claims | yes | 2026-07-06 | JL | settlement: light met |
| pitch | no | -- | -- | -- |
By records who approved: the human (copilot mode, the default) or persona:<preset> (unattended runs only -- attendance modes and persona presets live with the check worker). The stage strip's โ means "confirmed in the ledger", NOT "artifact exists on disk". A stage with a doc but no ledger row is unconfirmed. Venue-skipped stages never get ledger rows (they render -- in the strip).
Autonomy policy
Stage TRANSITION = always PAUSE (ask before advancing).
Work WITHIN a stage = can be autonomous (read, draft, raise state: planned probe sections, backfill).
Evidence dispatch = the PROBE phase worker is the only door; a stage never reads discoveries/, tasks/, or legacy probes/ inline, and never dispatches discovery/task orchestrator agents itself.
Recovery
If an intervention reached a late stage without per-stage confirmations, the gate state is UNCONFIRMED for all stages. A re-walk resets to seed and confirms each non-skipped stage one-by-one. Artifacts on disk are NOT deleted -- only the gate state resets.
No-Arg Chooser
When no intervention root is found, do not fan out. Emit a compact chooser (one line per entry; the Verbs block carries the detail):
๐ฏ haipipe-application: no intervention detected. Pick an entry:
venue /haipipe-application venue "<topic or intervention-path>" [--no-pin]
enter /haipipe-application enter "<intervention-path>" (missing path -> offers to scaffold it)
draft | probe (see /haipipe-application help text above)
Specialist Return Contract
Each specialist returns a tail block:
status: ok | blocked | failed
summary: 2-3 sentences on what the specialist did
artifacts: [paths created, read, or modified]
next: suggested next command
Delivery Need Routing
THE single source of truth for how an intervention (message / checklist / dashboard / report) records an evidence gap as a QUESTION, routes it to the bank, and backfills when the answer returns. Application-owned; the paper family keeps its own copy. There is no cross-skill shared file. The model itself belongs to probe (../../probe/haipipe-probe/SKILL.md); this section is the application-side routing.
Application work is demand-driven: a claim, content element, artifact slot, or round todo may reveal that the next action is evidence work. The enter/status path surfaces those needs before recommending more drafting.
How the application talks to the bank
A need is a QUESTION the intervention cannot answer itself. It is RAISED as a Q-<Stage>-<n> in the stage doc's Q-consumer section โ which is where its STAKE lives โ and bound to the bank by an ENTRY in the flat probe pool 1-probes/PPNN_<topic>/. No message bus, no shared contract file. Two channels carry it, and the agent (this session) is the medium:
1. Command a stage's DRAFT raises the questions (the Q-consumer list) AND authors
their probe plan (โ ORGANIZE + โก MATCH); APPROVE (human) reviews draft +
plan together and picks which to pursue. `/haipipe-application probe run
[PPNN]` hands the approved set to haipipe-application-probe (the PROBE
phase worker), which runs that plan FORWARD โ โข DISPATCH โ โฃ POINT โ
โค INTERPRET โ and never re-matches. DISPATCH goes through the stake-free
collector Agent(haipipe-probe-q-executor-agent) โ it calls the
task/discovery orchestrators in clean context. Stages never call an
orchestrator directly.
2. Disk the question lives as an ENTRY (`## QX<n>`) in 1-probes/PPNN_<topic>/;
(async) its **target**: binds by PATH to a QA file the executor wrote in the bank.
The entry's `### a-executor` holds a COPY of that QA answer; each
Q-consumer then writes its own a-consumer (its `Answer:` line in the stage
doc, anchored `[source: PP<NN>]`) in the intervention's words, and the
application reads THAT to backfill. No handshake, just read/write the same
entry in turn.
Who owns which format: the application owns the QUESTION โ the STAKE stays in the stage-doc Q-consumer, and the probe entry carries only the stake-free ### q-executor, the one thing the bank ever sees. The bank owns the ANSWER (the QA file's ## Answer, in general language). A probe is COMMUNICATION, not judgment โ it carries a question out and an answer back, and nothing else. A CLAIM's status is written by the author into 1c-claims.md, never in the probe file.
When to raise a question
Only when the deliverable requires EVIDENCE the project does not yet have. A framing/format/tone problem stays inside the application lifecycle. An evidence gap becomes a question bound to the bank.
stage gap -> a Q-consumer in the stage doc + an ENTRY in 1-probes/ (DRAFT: โ ORGANIZE + โก MATCH)
-> haipipe-application-probe runs it forward (โข DISPATCH -> โฃ POINT -> โค INTERPRET)
-> collector -> QA file answer -> ### a-executor -> each a-consumer
-> 1c-claims status backfill
Routes
claim needs evidence / robustness / literature / a data artifact -> /haipipe-application probe "<question>" (a SECTION in 1-probes/; MATCH first, dispatch only what MATCH cannot close)
outside context / benchmark (non-claim) -> /haipipe-discovery <question>
display element needs materialized output (not claim-gated) -> /haipipe-task-for-display <need> (or /haipipe-task <contract>)
wording/structure/tone -> the owning lifecycle stage skill (audience profile shapes tone)
standalone utility (a HUMAN, not the intervention: lit scan, data check) -> /haipipe-task qa | /haipipe-discovery qa (the bank's own door)
Claim-related evidence goes through a stage's PROBE phase โ the entry preserves the claim-evidence chain and makes the backlog visible. Non-claim utility work goes straight to the task/discovery door; if the answer later matters, open an entry whose **target**: points at the already-written QA file (bank: reuse โ nothing re-runs).
Question record
Each open question is one ENTRY in 1-probes/PPNN_<topic>/ (anatomy + states: fn/probes.md and ../../probe/haipipe-probe/SKILL.md). One file per TOPIC; one ## QX<n> entry per Q-EXECUTOR, each with four ### subsections โ the file is Q-executor-oriented, and the consumers hang off it:
## QX<n> one entry per Q-EXECUTOR; a topic-local id
### q-executor the question in general language, stake stripped โ the ONLY thing sent to
the bank, FROZEN; carries its own Deliverable: and Accepted: lines
### q-consumer one bullet per consumer this q-executor serves:
* Q-<Stage>-<n> โ <that consumer's ORIGINAL question, copied in>
### bank binding **route**: task | discovery the dispatch door, AUTHORITATIVE
**bank**: reuse | run | code | new the PROBE โก verdict on what the bank needs
**target**: a PATH to the answering QA file (`NEW <path>` while it does not exist)
**state**: planned | commissioned | answered | read | answered-local | failed
(DERIVED from disk)
### a-executor a COPY of the answering QA file's answer, written at harvest
The STAKE lives in each Q-consumer, in the stage doc, and is NEVER sent to an executor; a claim's status lives in 1c-claims.md, written by the author. BUILD-lane entries (days-to-weeks work) additionally carry **owner**: ยท **eta**: ยท **blocks**: ยท **cross-project**: under ### bank binding, present only at state: commissioned.
Backfill (the return direction)
When the QA file lands, โค INTERPRET copies its answer into the entry's ### a-executor; backfill flows FROM there:
- write `### a-executor` (a copy of the QA answer, anchored to **target**), ONLY against
an answered, non-superseded target โ `1-probes/` is the consumer-side single source of truth
- each Q-consumer then writes its OWN a-consumer in the stage doc (its `Answer:` line,
station โก, anchored `[source: PP<NN>]`) โ the answer in the intervention's own words
- if a Q-consumer serves a claim, the AUTHOR flips that claim's STATUS in 1c-claims.md
(supported | weak | GAP), flipping the C-line AND its Evidence Campaign row โ never in
the probe file; keep the overclaim check (never causal from associational evidence)
- refuted / GAP evidence: drop or reword (never ship an unsupported claim); a weak/GAP
claim stays with the caveat recorded, and the venue gate reads the campaign against its bar
- the bank NEVER edits application files; the executor writes the QA file, the worker
harvests it, the application decides how to phrase it for its audience
The same landed QA answer can serve both a paper and an application; each reads the same file differently and frames it for its own audience.
ALL evidence enters through a stage's PROBE phase; the intervention never calls the bank directly. Resolved evidence backfills into the ladder rungs (1a-descriptions numbers, 1c-claims statuses), 4-display, sections, or round logs. Evidence workers never own the intervention story.
Structure Pointers
Each area's internal contract lives with its owner; consult, never restate:
skill tree (0-enter / 1-lifecycle / 2-phase / 3-deliver / 4-iterate)
-> ../README.md (skill root; Skill Structure + Stage to Procedure + Router Rule)
intervention-folder layout -> ../README.md (skill root) + ../1-lifecycle/haipipe-application-lifecycle/SKILL.md (Folder Contract)
lifecycle stages + venue gating -> ../1-lifecycle/haipipe-application-lifecycle/SKILL.md (Intervention Lifecycle Contract)
stage gates + Gate Ledger -> this file, Stage Gate Protocol section
delivery needs + probe interface -> this file, Delivery Need Routing section
rounds -> 0-enter/haipipe-application-round (same vYYMMDD contract as paper)
venue knowledge (structure + tone-by-audience) -> ../venue/venue-<name> packs (venue is knowledge, not a pipeline)
Composing with Evidence Workers
/haipipe-application (router)
โโโบ /haipipe-application-lifecycle (seed -> 1a-descriptions -> 1b-themes -> 1c-claims -> 1d-advice -> [venue] -> pitch -> narrativeยฐ -> displayยฐ -> section-editยฐ)
โโโบ /haipipe-application-artifact (draft the deliverable from the venue profile + lifecycle stages)
โ
โ evidence path (a claim hits a gap):
โโโบ questions RAISED as entries in 1-probes/PPNN_<topic>/ โโบ haipipe-application-probe (the PROBE phase worker)
โโโบ Agent(haipipe-probe-q-executor-agent) (stake-free collector; dispatches /haipipe-task + /haipipe-discovery)
โโโ answers land as QA files; the a-consumer + 1c-claims status backfill into the ladder, sections, round logs
a stage reaches the bank ONLY through its PROBE phase โ no direct discover/task verb
Feedback & Digest
/haipipe-application feedback "<text>" captures a complaint/wish about THIS skill family, capture-time-routed into the concerned sub-skill's feedback/ inbox (folder = the record; orchestrator inbox is the fallback), MERGE-OR-CREATE so inboxes stay self-limiting; feedback list [skill] aggregates, feedback move <file> <skill> re-routes. /haipipe-application digest [session] [--dry-run] harvests a session transcript into discrete feedback items (dedup, mandatory confirm gate, then the same capture; global behavioral prefs fan out to every orchestrator's PREFERENCES.md instead of the inboxes). Full spec: fn/feedback.md + fn/digest.md; this section is a pointer, not the spec.
