Skip to main content
Run any Skill in Manus
with one click
julianken
GitHub creator profile

julianken

Repository-level view of 57 collected skills across 9 GitHub repositories.

skills collected
57
repositories
9
updated
2026-07-03
repository map

Where the skills live

Top repositories by collected skill count, with their share of this creator catalog and occupation spread.

#01
agentic-seed
11 skills · 2026-06-22
Software DevelopersWeb & Digital Interface DesignersProject Management SpecialistsSoftware Quality Assurance Analysts & Testers
4 occupation categories · 100% classified
19%share
#02
violin-tools
11 skills · 2026-06-10
Software DevelopersSoftware Quality Assurance Analysts & TestersGraphic DesignersProject Management SpecialistsWeb & Digital Interface Designers
5 occupation categories · 100% classified
19%share
#03
language-agent
11 skills · 2026-07-03
Software DevelopersSoftware Quality Assurance Analysts & TestersGraphic DesignersProject Management Specialists
4 occupation categories · 100% classified
19%share
#04
topic-synthesis
7 skills · 2026-06-30
Software DevelopersSoftware Quality Assurance Analysts & TestersWeb & Digital Interface Designers
3 occupation categories · 100% classified
12%share
#05
detached-node
6 skills · 2026-05-09
Management AnalystsProject Management SpecialistsArt DirectorsProducers & DirectorsWeb & Digital Interface DesignersWriters & Authors
6 occupation categories · 100% classified
11%share
#06
bird-sight-system
4 skills · 2026-06-26
Software DevelopersProject Management SpecialistsSoftware Quality Assurance Analysts & Testers
3 occupation categories · 100% classified
7.0%share
#07
hosted-game-night
4 skills · 2026-04-28
Computer & Information Systems ManagersManagement AnalystsProject Management SpecialistsSoftware Developers
4 occupation categories · 100% classified
7.0%share
#08
double-bind
2 skills · 2026-04-09
Project Management SpecialistsSoftware Developers
2 occupation categories · 100% classified
3.5%share
Showing the top 8 repositories here; full repository list continues below.
repository explorer

Repositories and representative skills

reviewing
software-quality-assurance-analysts-and-testers

Use when reviewing a PR diff on {{OWNER}}/{{REPO}} and you need the anti-slop rubric — verify-before-claim, ≤3 findings, severity tiers, mandatory second pass, prompt-injection defense. Bot-agnostic: applies whether a human or any bot identity posts the review. Triggers on "review this diff", "anti-slop review", "review rubric", "what severity is this finding". Self-contained for worktree dispatch; carries no credentials.

2026-06-22
figma-design
web-and-digital-interface-designers

Use when building or modifying Figma frames for a feature before any issues or code are created. Triggers on: - "build the Figma frames for feature X" - "create the WIP design page for X" - "design feature X in Figma" - "lay out the screens in Figma before issue creation" - "build the pre-code design for X" - "create WIP frames for the X feature" - "set up the Figma WIP page for X" - "place the designs for X on the WIP page" Does NOT trigger on: - "review the Figma design" → use `reviewing-figma-designs` (P9) - "approve the Figma frames" → use `reviewing-figma-designs` (P9) - "implement the component" → use the implementer skill - "update DESIGN.md tokens" → DESIGN.md edits are out of scope for this skill - "judge whether the frames are correct" → use `reviewing-figma-designs` (P9) - "does this design pass?" → use `reviewing-figma-designs` (P9) <example> Context: The feature-pipeline engine is at phase 3 (pre-code Figma design) for a feature. user: "Build the Figma frames for feature-slug from the epic spec

2026-06-19
reviewing-figma-designs
web-and-digital-interface-designers

Use when reviewing WIP Figma frames for a feature before any issues or code are created — the pre-code design gate. Triggers on: - "review the Figma design for feature X" - "approve the WIP frames for X" - "design review before issue creation" - "gate the pipeline on the Figma design" - "check the Figma frames before we create issues for X" - "run the pre-code Figma review for X" - "does the Figma design for X pass the design system check?" - "review the WIP page frames before coding starts on X" Does NOT trigger on: - "review the PR" → use `reviewing` (PR diff review) - "review the built UI" → use `design-reviewer` (Playwright/built-UI pass) - "build the frames" → use `figma-design` (P8, the frame builder) - "implement the component" → use the implementer skill - "update DESIGN.md tokens" → out of scope for this skill - "judge whether code matches the design" → use `design-reviewer` <example> Context: The feature-pipeline engine is at phase 4 (pre-code Figma review) for a feature. The figma-design (P8) ski

2026-06-19
feature-pipeline
software-developers

Triggers on intent-to-run-the-pipeline phrases. Use when the user says "run the feature pipeline", "start the pipeline for X", "kick off the orchestration", "automate feature X end-to-end", "feature pipeline", "run the pipeline for X", "start the orchestration", or "pipeline a new feature". Does NOT trigger on "create an issue", "review a PR", "open a PR", "merge a branch", or "deploy" — those stay in their own skills.

2026-06-19
epic-authoring
project-management-specialists

Use when a new feature needs a research-backed epic spec synthesized into tmp/docs/ before child issues are drafted. Triggers on "research and write the epic", "author the epic spec", "write the feature epic", "run the research phase for the epic", "synthesize a feature brief into an epic", "draft the epic from the brainstorm brief", "produce the epic spec for issue fan-out", "build the epic for this feature", "epic research for <feature>", or "I need an epic spec before filing child issues". Invoke when phase(2) of the feature pipeline fires, when the caller has a brainstorm brief and needs a structured epic before calling issue-authoring, or when any session asks to research and produce an epic spec for a new product feature. Self-contained for worktree dispatch — all hard constraints restated in-body.

2026-06-19
reviewing-pipeline-assets
software-developers

Asset-specific review pass for pipeline skills, agents, and the dashboard server in {{REPO_SLUG}}. Use when reviewing a pipeline skill PR, reviewing the epic-authoring skill, reviewing the feature-pipeline workflow, reviewing the dashboard server (P2), reviewing a pipeline agent, asset review for the pipeline, or when @{{REVIEW_BOT}} needs to review any P2/P3/P5/P6/P8/P9 asset PR. <example> Context: PR for the epic-authoring skill (P3) is open. user: "Review the P3 epic-authoring skill PR with asset checks" assistant: "Dispatching reviewing-pipeline-assets — apply R1–R12 first (reviewing/SKILL.md), then A1–A6 asset checks against the skill frontmatter, trigger corpus, evals, and mirror state." </example> <example> Context: PR for the feature-pipeline workflow engine (P5) is open. user: "Run the pipeline asset review on PR #111" assistant: "Applying reviewing-pipeline-assets: R1–R12 base rubric first, then A3/A5/A6 (A1/A2/A4 N/A for a .js workflow with no frontmatter description)." </example> <example> Cont

2026-06-19
creating-prs
software-developers

Use when drafting a PR body or deciding what goes in the description on {{OWNER}}/{{REPO}}. Triggers on "draft a PR description", "what should the PR body say", "fill the PR template", "PR body sections", or a PR that came back with template-shaped feedback. The generic five-section method, conventional-commit rules, and plan-reference discipline — bot-agnostic, no credentials. Self-contained for worktree dispatch.

2026-06-06
issue-authoring
software-developers

Use when opening or rewriting an implementation issue or plan spec on {{OWNER}}/{{REPO}}. Triggers on "create issue", "write the issue", "issue spec", "implementation plan issue", or batch prep/planning work. Self-contained for worktree dispatch.

2026-06-06
Showing top 8 of 11 collected skills in this repository.
feature-pipeline
software-developers

Triggers on intent-to-run-the-pipeline phrases. Use when the user says "run the feature pipeline", "start the pipeline for X", "kick off the orchestration", "automate feature X end-to-end", "feature pipeline", "run the pipeline for X", "start the orchestration", or "pipeline a new feature". Does NOT trigger on "create an issue", "review a PR", "open a PR", "merge a branch", or "deploy" — those stay in their own skills.

2026-06-10
reviewing-figma-designs
web-and-digital-interface-designers

Use when reviewing WIP Figma frames for a feature before any issues or code are created — the pre-code design gate. Triggers on: - "review the Figma design for feature X" - "approve the WIP frames for X" - "design review before issue creation" - "gate the pipeline on the Figma design" - "check the Figma frames before we create issues" - "run the pre-code Figma review for X" - "does the Figma design pass the design system check?" - "review the WIP page frames before coding starts" Does NOT trigger on: - "review the PR" → use `reviewing` (PR diff review) - "review the built UI" → use `design-reviewer` (Playwright/built-UI pass) - "build the frames" → use `figma-design` (P8, the frame builder) - "implement the component" → use the implementer skill - "update DESIGN.md tokens" → out of scope for this skill - "judge whether code matches the design" → use `design-reviewer` <example> Context: The feature-pipeline engine is at phase 4 (pre-code Figma review) for feature "tuner-display". The figma-design (P8) skill

2026-06-10
epic-authoring
project-management-specialists

Use when a new feature needs a research-backed epic spec synthesized into tmp/docs/ before child issues are drafted. Triggers on "research and write the epic", "author the epic spec", "write the feature epic", "run the research phase for the epic", "synthesize a feature brief into an epic", "draft the epic from the brainstorm brief", "produce the epic spec for issue fan-out", "build the epic for this feature", "epic research for <feature>", or "I need an epic spec before filing child issues". Invoke when phase(2) of the feature pipeline fires, when the caller has a brainstorm brief and needs a structured epic before calling issue-authoring, or when any session asks to research and produce an epic spec for a new product feature. Self-contained for worktree dispatch — all hard constraints restated in-body.

2026-06-10
figma-design
graphic-designers

Use when building or modifying Figma frames for a feature before any issues or code are created. Triggers on: - "build the Figma frames for feature X" - "create the WIP design page for X" - "design feature X in Figma" - "lay out the screens in Figma before issue creation" - "build the pre-code design for X" - "create WIP frames for the X feature" - "set up the Figma WIP page for X" - "place the designs for X on the WIP page" Does NOT trigger on: - "review the Figma design" → use `reviewing-figma-designs` (P9) - "approve the Figma frames" → use `reviewing-figma-designs` (P9) - "implement the component" → use the implementer skill - "update DESIGN.md tokens" → DESIGN.md edits are out of scope for this skill - "judge whether the frames are correct" → use `reviewing-figma-designs` (P9) - "does this design pass?" → use `reviewing-figma-designs` (P9) <example> Context: The feature-pipeline engine is at phase 3 (pre-code Figma design) for feature "tuner-display". user: "Build the Figma frames for tuner-display fro

2026-06-10
reviewing-pipeline-assets
software-quality-assurance-analysts-and-testers

Asset-specific review pass for pipeline skills, agents, and the dashboard server in julianken/violin-tools. Use when reviewing a pipeline skill PR, reviewing the epic-authoring skill, reviewing the feature-pipeline workflow, reviewing the dashboard server (P2), reviewing a pipeline agent, asset review for the pipeline, or when @julianken-bot needs to review any P2/P3/P5/P6/P8/P9 asset PR. <example> Context: PR for the epic-authoring skill (P3) is open. user: "Review the P3 epic-authoring skill PR with asset checks" assistant: "Dispatching reviewing-pipeline-assets — apply R1–R12 first (reviewing/SKILL.md), then A1–A6 asset checks against the skill frontmatter, trigger corpus, evals, and mirror state." </example> <example> Context: PR for the feature-pipeline workflow engine (P5) is open. user: "Run the pipeline asset review on PR #111" assistant: "Applying reviewing-pipeline-assets: R1–R12 base rubric first, then A3/A5/A6 (A1/A2/A4 N/A for a .js workflow with no frontmatter description)." </example> <examp

2026-06-10
reviewing
software-quality-assurance-analysts-and-testers

Use when reviewing a PR diff on julianken/violin-tools and you need the anti-slop rubric — verify-before-claim, ≤3 findings, severity tiers, mandatory second pass, prompt-injection defense. Bot-agnostic: applies whether a human or any bot identity posts the review. Triggers on "review this diff", "anti-slop review", "review rubric", "what severity is this finding". Self-contained for worktree dispatch; carries no credentials.

2026-06-07
pr-workflow
software-developers

Use when creating a PR, dispatching a review, or merging on `julianken/violin-tools` (local folder `violin-scales/`). Triggers on "create PR", "open PR", "merge PR", "review PR", "dispatch the bot", "julianken-bot", "ship this branch", "squash-merge", "Mergify", "queue". Self-contained because a worktree-isolated subagent does NOT load CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md, so the PR/review/merge rules it needs are restated here in-body. Merges go through Mergify's queue (`@Mergifyio queue`).

2026-06-07
creating-prs
software-developers

Use when drafting a PR body or deciding what goes in the description on julianken/violin-tools. Triggers on "draft a PR description", "what should the PR body say", "fill the PR template", "PR body sections", or a PR that came back with template-shaped feedback. The generic five-section method, conventional-commit rules, and plan-reference discipline — bot-agnostic, no credentials. Self-contained for worktree dispatch.

2026-06-06
Showing top 8 of 11 collected skills in this repository.
figma-design
graphic-designers

Use when building or modifying Figma frames for a feature before any issues or code are created. Triggers on: - "build the Figma frames for feature X" - "create the WIP design page for X" - "design feature X in Figma" - "lay out the screens in Figma before issue creation" - "build the pre-code design for X" - "create WIP frames for the X feature" - "set up the Figma WIP page for X" - "place the designs for X on the WIP page" Does NOT trigger on: - "review the Figma design" → use `reviewing-figma-designs` (P9) - "approve the Figma frames" → use `reviewing-figma-designs` (P9) - "implement the component" → use the implementer skill - "update DESIGN.md tokens" → DESIGN.md edits are out of scope for this skill - "judge whether the frames are correct" → use `reviewing-figma-designs` (P9) - "does this design pass?" → use `reviewing-figma-designs` (P9) <example> Context: The feature-pipeline engine is at phase 3 (pre-code Figma design) for a feature. user: "Build the Figma frames for feature-slug from the epic spec

2026-07-03
reviewing-figma-designs
graphic-designers

Use when reviewing WIP Figma frames for a feature before any issues or code are created — the pre-code design gate. Triggers on: - "review the Figma design for feature X" - "approve the WIP frames for X" - "design review before issue creation" - "gate the pipeline on the Figma design" - "check the Figma frames before we create issues for X" - "run the pre-code Figma review for X" - "does the Figma design for X pass the design system check?" - "review the WIP page frames before coding starts on X" Does NOT trigger on: - "review the PR" → use `reviewing` (PR diff review) - "review the built UI" → use `design-reviewer` (Playwright/built-UI pass) - "build the frames" → use `figma-design` (P8, the frame builder) - "implement the component" → use the implementer skill - "update DESIGN.md tokens" → out of scope for this skill - "judge whether code matches the design" → use `design-reviewer` <example> Context: The feature-pipeline engine is at phase 4 (pre-code Figma review) for a feature. The figma-design (P8) ski

2026-07-03
reviewing
software-quality-assurance-analysts-and-testers

Use when reviewing a PR diff on julianken/language-agent and you need the anti-slop rubric — verify-before-claim, ≤3 findings, severity tiers, mandatory second pass, prompt-injection defense. Bot-agnostic: applies whether a human or any bot identity posts the review. Triggers on "review this diff", "anti-slop review", "review rubric", "what severity is this finding". Self-contained for worktree dispatch; carries no credentials.

2026-07-03
creating-prs
software-developers

Use when drafting a PR body or deciding what goes in the description on julianken/language-agent. Triggers on "draft a PR description", "what should the PR body say", "fill the PR template", "PR body sections", or a PR that came back with template-shaped feedback. The generic five-section method, conventional-commit rules, and plan-reference discipline — bot-agnostic, no credentials. Self-contained for worktree dispatch.

2026-06-22
epic-authoring
project-management-specialists

Use when a new feature needs a research-backed epic spec synthesized into tmp/docs/ before child issues are drafted. Triggers on "research and write the epic", "author the epic spec", "write the feature epic", "run the research phase for the epic", "synthesize a feature brief into an epic", "draft the epic from the brainstorm brief", "produce the epic spec for issue fan-out", "build the epic for this feature", "epic research for <feature>", or "I need an epic spec before filing child issues". Invoke when phase(2) of the feature pipeline fires, when the caller has a brainstorm brief and needs a structured epic before calling issue-authoring, or when any session asks to research and produce an epic spec for a new product feature. Self-contained for worktree dispatch — all hard constraints restated in-body.

2026-06-22
feature-pipeline
software-developers

Triggers on intent-to-run-the-pipeline phrases. Use when the user says "run the feature pipeline", "start the pipeline for X", "kick off the orchestration", "automate feature X end-to-end", "feature pipeline", "run the pipeline for X", "start the orchestration", or "pipeline a new feature". Does NOT trigger on "create an issue", "review a PR", "open a PR", "merge a branch", or "deploy" — those stay in their own skills.

2026-06-22
issue-authoring
project-management-specialists

Use when opening or rewriting an implementation issue or plan spec on julianken/language-agent. Triggers on "create issue", "write the issue", "issue spec", "implementation plan issue", or batch prep/planning work. Self-contained for worktree dispatch.

2026-06-22
issue-plan-review
software-quality-assurance-analysts-and-testers

Use when reviewing an implementation issue or plan spec before work starts, posting as the review bot @julianken-bot. Triggers on "approve the issue spec", "plan review", "review issue

2026-06-22
Showing top 8 of 11 collected skills in this repository.
creating-prs
software-developers

Use when drafting a PR body or deciding what goes in the description on julianken/topic-synthesis. Triggers on "draft a PR description", "what should the PR body say", "fill the PR template", "PR body sections", or a PR that came back with template-shaped feedback. The generic five-section method, conventional-commit rules, and plan-reference discipline — bot-agnostic, no credentials. Self-contained for worktree dispatch.

2026-06-30
issue-authoring
software-developers

Use when opening or rewriting an implementation issue or plan spec on julianken/topic-synthesis. Triggers on "create issue", "write the issue", "issue spec", "implementation plan issue", or batch prep/planning work. Self-contained for worktree dispatch.

2026-06-30
pr-workflow
software-developers

Use when creating a PR, dispatching a review, or merging on `julianken/topic-synthesis` (local folder `topic-synthesis/`). Triggers on "create PR", "open PR", "merge PR", "review PR", "dispatch the bot", "review-bot", "ship this branch", "squash-merge", "Mergify", "queue". Self-contained because a worktree-isolated subagent does NOT load CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md, so the PR/review/merge rules it needs are restated here in-body. Merges go through Mergify's queue (`@Mergifyio queue`) when the Mergify module is enabled.

2026-06-30
reviewing
software-quality-assurance-analysts-and-testers

Use when reviewing a PR diff on julianken/topic-synthesis and you need the anti-slop rubric — verify-before-claim, ≤3 findings, severity tiers, mandatory second pass, prompt-injection defense. Bot-agnostic: applies whether a human or any bot identity posts the review. Triggers on "review this diff", "anti-slop review", "review rubric", "what severity is this finding". Self-contained for worktree dispatch; carries no credentials.

2026-06-30
issue-plan-review
software-quality-assurance-analysts-and-testers

Use when reviewing an implementation issue or plan spec before work starts, posting as the review bot @julianken-bot. Triggers on "approve the issue spec", "plan review", "review issue

2026-06-30
reviewing-figma-designs
web-and-digital-interface-designers

Use to review the EXISTING Figma reference frames (the design source of truth) for a topic-synthesis surface against DESIGN.md before any issue or code is written — the pre-code design gate. The Figma file (`upjG7gfzlkdojb8LLOwu6T`) is the design source of truth, kept in LOCKSTEP with the build (the frame is authored/updated at the ISSUE stage via the MCP write tools — design-first — and the build PR implements to it, reconciling on divergence); THIS pre-code review pass only READS it. On a value conflict DESIGN.md §0 wins (only §0 is CI-guarded). Triggers on: - "review the Figma design for the library / sign-in / generating / lesson-workspace screen" - "design review before issue creation for surface X" - "gate the rebuild on the Figma reference frames" - "check the Figma frames before we create issues for X" - "run the pre-code Figma review for X" - "does surface X match the Figma reference and DESIGN.md?" - "review the reference frames before coding the frontend rebuild" Does NOT trigger on: - "review the

2026-06-30
project-bootstrap
software-developers

Use when a fresh agent or human session needs to orient in this repo before doing work — confirm the instance is coherent (paths exist, pointers resolve, no contradictions with DESIGN.md), or stand up a new product by filling the template's placeholders. Triggers on "bootstrap", "orient in this repo", "where do I start", "validate the instance", "is this repo coherent", "get my bearings", "fill the template", "fill mode", "stand up a new product". Self-contained for worktree dispatch.

2026-06-18
copy-revision
writers-and-authors

Five-stage revision pipeline for fixing AI-flavored prose on detached-node. Use when revising copy flagged by .analysis/copy-audit.md, or when applying the audit's rubric to any piece of prose on the site. Composes with creative-funnel (for parallel multi-piece work) and uses the prose-critic agent for diagnosis and validation. Loads .analysis/voice-corpus/VOICE.md as cached context.

2026-05-09
analysis-funnel
management-analysts-131111

Structured 5→5→3→1 investigation pipeline that sends parallel agents to explore facets of a question, iterates on findings, and produces a comprehensive analysis report. Use this whenever the user asks to "analyze", "investigate", "audit", "assess", or "do a deep-dive on" a broad, open-ended topic where the goal is understanding (codebase health checks, technology assessments, architecture audits, research questions) rather than implementing a fix. Do NOT use for implementation planning (prefer decision-funnel or creative-funnel) or for tasks with a known answer.

2026-05-05
creative-funnel
art-directorsproducers-and-directors

Parallel creative production pipeline (N items) with spec review and quality review cycles per item, disk checkpoints, and crash recovery. Produces N creative artifacts + structured documentation.

2026-05-05
decision-funnel
project-management-specialistsmanagement-analysts-131111

Structured investigate-iterate-synthesize pipeline (5->5->3->1) that sends parallel agents to explore different facets of a problem, iterates on findings, progressively synthesizes, and produces a detailed execution plan

2026-05-05
design-review
web-and-digital-interface-designers

Run a critical design review on a web application

2026-05-05
subagent-workflow
project-management-specialists

MANDATORY for all multi-step tasks - parallel task execution with sequential per-task workflow (implementer → spec review → quality review) with GitHub Issues as source of truth

2026-05-05
map-consistency-audit
software-quality-assurance-analysts-and-testers

Use when running or interpreting the bird-maps.com prod consistency audit, or dispatching the map-consistency-auditor agent. Triggers on "map consistency audit", "audit the map", "check bird counts", "filter numbers don't add up", "birds disappear at zoom", "desktop pills vanish". Encodes the metamorphic relation catalog, the carve-outs that prevent false positives, the Cloudflare pacing rules, the two-stage hash-wait, and the confirm-first triage flow.

2026-06-26
pr-workflow
software-developers

Use when creating a PR, dispatching a review, or merging on `julianken/bird-sight-system`. Triggers on "create PR", "open PR", "merge PR", "queue PR", "review PR", "@Mergifyio queue", "dispatch the bot", "julianken-bot". Encodes the four load-bearing rules that CLAUDE.md previously held as prose; progressive-disclosure-friendly for subagents dispatched with `isolation: "worktree"` that do not load CLAUDE.md.

2026-06-18
curating-fallback-silhouettes
software-developers

Use when a family on bird-maps.com renders the `_FALLBACK` shape because Phylopic has no usable CC-licensed art, when the `/api/silhouettes` audit returns families with `svgData == null AND svgUrl == null`, or when the user asks to "hand-curate", "hand-pick", or "source" a silhouette for a specific bird family. Also triggers on "process the remaining null silhouettes", "find a roadrunner silhouette", "fix the cuckoos", or similar requests to add non-Phylopic silhouettes via the silhouette admin-api.

2026-06-14
writing-plans
project-management-specialists

Project-level extension of the superpowers:writing-plans skill for julianken/bird-sight-system. Adds mandatory CSS sub-task gate for frontend component plans (closes

2026-06-02
Showing 9 of 9 repositories
All repositories loaded
julianken Agent Skills | SkillsMP