Menu
Process Forgejo PR feedback with reflection, guardrail-gap classification, and inline thread replies.
Install with Codex or Claude Copy this prompt, paste it into Codex, Claude, or another assistant, and let it review the skill page and install it for you.
Based on SOC occupation classification
Fine-grained outside-in RED-GREEN-REFACTOR microcycles with specialist agents and single-diagnostic implementation.
RGR sequence, observed-failure evidence, drill-down unit tests, and non-behavioral exemptions for Phoenix/Commanded work.
Phoenix 1.8, Postgres, Commanded, Ecto, ExUnit, Dialyzer, and strict static-check conventions.
Phoenix auth/session/CSRF, command authorization, event data sensitivity, Postgres, dependency, secret, and threat-model review triggers.
Classify review feedback and choose proportionate guardrails without inflating default context cost.
Write implementation plans as test-addressed red-green-refactor cycles rather than component waterfalls.
| name | forgejo-feedback-protocol |
| description | Process Forgejo PR feedback with reflection, guardrail-gap classification, and inline thread replies. |
Use this skill for every actionable PR review comment.
tea or the Forgejo REST API.guardrail-gap or one-off using review-taxonomy.Forgejo threads replies by review, path, and diff position. For an inline reply, post to the existing review comments endpoint with:
{
"body": "<reply>",
"path": "<comment.path>",
"new_position": <comment.position>,
"old_position": 0
}
Do not use prose line numbers from the comment body as new_position.
Top-level PR comments are allowed only after all actionable inline threads have a per-thread response.