with one click
evaluation-experiment-review
对实验结果、功能试运行和评审意见进行证据化判断与改进建议输出
Install with Codex or Claude Copy this prompt, paste it into Codex, Claude, or another assistant, and let it review the skill page and install it for you.
Menu
对实验结果、功能试运行和评审意见进行证据化判断与改进建议输出
Install with Codex or Claude Copy this prompt, paste it into Codex, Claude, or another assistant, and let it review the skill page and install it for you.
Based on SOC occupation classification
Use when the user asks for a deep code review, adversarial review, multi-agent review, risk-ranked review, PR review, security-sensitive review, or implementation verification with concrete file and line evidence.
Use when the user asks to debug a failing test, runtime error, regression, flaky behavior, production-like failure, root-cause analysis, or loop-until-done repair workflow.
Use when the user asks for source-backed research, official-documentation lookup, technical comparison, dependency evaluation, repository investigation plus synthesis, or fan-out research with ranked conclusions.
Use when the user asks for a dynamic workflow, multi-agent workflow, task-specific harness, complex task orchestration, fan-out synthesis, adversarial verification, generate-and-filter exploration, tournament-style solution search, or loop-until-done execution in Codex.
Wireframe workflow for low-fidelity structure, hierarchy, and information layout exploration.
Animation workflow for motion-heavy artifacts, scene timing, and browser playback review.
| name | evaluation-experiment-review |
| description | 对实验结果、功能试运行和评审意见进行证据化判断与改进建议输出 |
| version | v0.1 |
| template_version | 1.1 |
| owner | xiaoz |
| cn_title | 评估与实验复核 |
| en_alias | evaluation-experiment-review |
| skill_family | evaluation |
| primary_artifact | evaluation verdict memo |
references/evaluation-patterns-sanitized.md:评估 memo 的判断结构与结论表达references/badcase-patterns-sanitized.md:bad-case 分类方式与表格模式references/source-coverage.md:本 skill 可使用的脱敏来源覆盖说明| Category | Typical tool types | Enable when | Avoid when | Expected evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Local docs/files | shell / file read / pdf/text review | 结果保存在本地文档、会议记录、反馈表里 | 没有结果材料时 | 样本摘录、反馈来源 |
| Structured docs | markdown / verdict memo / bad-case table | 需要形成 go/no-go memo、评审摘要 | 仅口头讨论时 | 结构化结论与行动项 |
| Data analysis | spreadsheet / metric comparison / segmentation | 有指标、分组结果、A/B 数据 | 没有统计材料时不要伪量化 | 指标表、分层观察 |
| Web research | official docs / benchmark references | 需要对照外部标准或最新平台规则 | 纯内部试运行复盘时 | 外部标准来源 |
| No-browse reasoning | direct synthesis only | 所有结果材料都在本地且不依赖最新事实 | 需要行业 benchmark 时 | 基于现有样本的判断 |
请帮我复核“当前页面问答”功能的灰度结果:我给你 20 条用户提问样本、人工标注的满意/不满意、以及 3 类失败案例。请输出这个版本是否适合扩灰,哪些问题是 blocker,哪些只需要快速修复。