| name | assess-team-documentation |
| description | analyze documentation contributions and patterns by developer |
Soul
Analyze documentation contributions — who writes docs, who doesn't, quality of documentation.
Analysis Protocol
Phase 1: Documentation Discovery
Find documentation files:
.md files in root and docs/ directories
- README files
- API documentation
- Architecture decision records (ADRs)
- Runbooks and guides
Phase 2: Author Attribution
Attribute documentation work:
- Git blame on doc files
- Commits touching docs/ directories
- README updates
- Wiki contributions (if applicable)
Phase 3: Documentation Quality
Assess:
- Completeness (does it actually explain things?)
- Currency (when last updated?)
- Clarity (clear structure, examples?)
- Coverage (are key areas documented?)
Output Format
Save to: docs/assessment/team-<YYYY-MM-DD>-documentation.md
# Team Assessment: Documentation
## Documentation Contributions
| Author | Doc Commits | Files Created | Files Updated |
|--------|-------------|---------------|---------------|
| ... | N | N | N |
## Documentation Coverage
| Area | Documented | Last Updated |
|------|-----------|-------------|
| ... | Yes/No | date |
## Key Findings
1. [Finding with evidence]
2. [Finding with evidence]
## Score: A-F (one line rationale)
## Recommendations
1. [Priority]
2. [Secondary]
Return Summary
Return max 10 lines:
- Top doc contributors
- Coverage gaps
- Score: A-F with one-line rationale