| name | quality-control |
| description | Peer review checklist and quality standards for intelligence products. Loaded by the quality-reviewer agent. |
| user-invocable | false |
| metadata | {"version":"1.0.0"} |
Quality Control Standards
Review Process
- All products must be reviewed before moving to "published" status
- Reviews are performed by the quality-reviewer agent
- Products with CRITICAL issues are returned for revision
- Products with 3+ MAJOR issues are returned for revision
- MINOR issues are noted but don't block publication
Peer Review Checklist
A. Structural Integrity (Weight: 15%)
B. Analytical Rigor (Weight: 30%)
C. Sourcing (Weight: 20%)
D. Mandated Language (Weight: 20%)
E. Technical Accuracy (Weight: 10%)
F. Writing Quality (Weight: 5%)
Scoring
Calculate weighted score (0-10):
- Each section: 0 (none met) to 10 (all met)
- Weighted by percentages above
- Final score = weighted average
| Score | Verdict |
|---|
| 8-10 | Approved — publish |
| 6-7 | Approved with minor revisions — can publish after fixes |
| 4-5 | Revision required — significant issues |
| 0-3 | Rejected — fundamental problems |
Issue Severity
- CRITICAL: Factual error in key finding, missing TLP on sensitive content, unsupported primary conclusion, potential harm if published as-is
- MAJOR: Missing confidence level on assessment, vague likelihood language on prediction, missing source assessment on key evidence, logical flaw in reasoning, missing key section
- MINOR: Grammar/formatting, style inconsistency, minor Admiralty rating disagreement, non-essential section could be improved