artifact-organization

name	artifact-organization
description	Audit whether a project's artifact layout still expresses its accepted design, then apply one smallest safe organization transition when a material gap exists. Use for "organize the repo", "组织架构", "根据地", stale project structure, source/projection confusion, or campaign residue. Not for ordinary file cleanup, system-module design, Sequence change, or skill authoring.
argument-hint	[audit | transition]

Artifact Organization

Principle expression

Primary: P06 Supporting: P14, P12, P15

Principle source

Use a host Sequence and interpretations when the host declares them. Otherwise use this package's read-only fallback in references/sequence.md.

Scope

Own one decision: does the carrier's current authority-and-lifetime layout contradict accepted design, and what smallest organization transition closes that gap?

File structure is an expression, not the design. Classify artifacts by role before moving paths: semantic source, durable evidence, living expression, process artifact, or projection. Use references/artifact-classes.md. Read references/concepts.md only when the classification itself is unclear, and references/base-metaphor.md only when the user invokes its vocabulary.

Core method

1. Read accepted design and actual state. If no design governs the carrier, route to design work instead of inventing organization from folder names.
2. Audit before changing. Compare current roles and paths with the accepted target. Name one material gap and the strongest keep-as-is case. If no gap changes authority, inheritance, repeated action, or rebuildability, stop.
3. Justify the form. For every proposed artifact, role, gate, or path distinction, name the future decision it changes and the risk of omitting it. Merge, make conditional, or omit distinctions without a separate response.
4. Apply one transition. After any required approval, execute the smallest wave that closes the named gap. Preserve sources and durable evidence; regenerate projections from their declared source.
5. Verify and settle in the same pass. Check gap closure, source authority, recoverable inheritance, and absence of unnecessary residue. Promote stable organization into host design; archive or discard process material according to whether a later decision needs it.

Commands

• /artifact-organization audit → commands/audit.md
• /artifact-organization transition → commands/transition.md
• No argument → run the read-only audit path and report whether a transition is warranted.

Artifact policy

Default to a conversation result. Create one campaign record only when the work needs durable handoff, approval, or multi-session continuation. That record contains audit, gap, transition, verification, and disposition together; use references/artifact-paths.md.

Conditional boundaries

• A change to semantic authority, public index, or irreversible evidence requires the host's designated human approval.
• A missing base charter routes to host design; implementation drift without an organization gap routes to design reconciliation.
• Sequence doctrine routes to principle-cultivation; skill expression routes to skill-engineering.
• Do not create a campaign merely to delete noise or make a tree look tidy.

Completion standard

The accepted design and actual carrier agree on artifact roles and paths; any executed transition has a recorded acceptance result; required history remains reachable; and no process artifact survives without a future decision it serves.