Install with Codex or Claude Copy this prompt, paste it into Codex, Claude, or another assistant, and let it review the skill page and install it for you.
A direct command skips the review prompt. Inspect the source before running it.
Gate: If you can't extract at least 3 morphemes per domain in the domain's native language, you don't understand the domain well enough. Go read more. Use arxiv.
Phase 2: WATER (Dokkado Sui -- Discover Isomorphisms)
"Adopt the form of your opponent to see his strategy."
DO NOT impose a mapping. Let it emerge.
For each pair of domains, ask:
Does morpheme A in D1 play the same STRUCTURAL ROLE as morpheme X in D2?
Is the relationship between A and B in D1 the same as between X and Y in D2?
Does the fundamental tension in D1 map to the fundamental tension in D2?
The isomorphism must preserve RELATIONS, not just elements.
ISO_MAP:
| Structural Role | D1 term | D2 term | D3 term | D4+ term |
|----------------|---------|---------|---------|----------|
| [Role 1] | | | | |
| [Role 2] | | | | |
| [Role 3] | | | | |
| [Tension] | | | | |
meta-pattern gate: Does this mapping hold in 3+ domains? If only 2 -- it might be analogy, not isomorphism. Keep hunting or discard.
smithery integration: Search for tools that work across the mapped domains. If an MCP server exists that bridges two domains, that's evidence of structural similarity someone else already noticed.
Phase 3: FIRE (Dokkado Ka -- Derive the Kernel)
"Strike from the void with decisive force."
From the isomorphism map, derive the ABSTRACT FORM -- the structure that all domains instantiate.
This is not a description. It's a generator. Given the abstract form, you should be able to PRODUCE the domain-specific instances.
Critique: Does it actually generate all domains? Or does it only describe them?
Weakest point: Which domain fits worst?
Refine: Tighten or generalize
Ego-check: Am I improving or just polishing?
arxiv integration: Search for the abstract form. Has someone already found this kernel? If yes, cite them. If no, you might have something new (or something wrong -- G4 applies).
Phase 4: WIND (Dokkado Fu -- Probing Attacks)
"Know the ways of all professions."
The kernel must predict. In at least 3 domains, generate:
A novel prediction (something not known, derived from the kernel)
A retrodiction (something known, re-derived from the kernel more simply)
A failure mode (where the kernel breaks down or becomes approximate)
If no novel predictions: The kernel is descriptive, not generative. Go back to Fire.
arxiv integration: Search for experimental evidence that could validate or falsify each prediction. Cite specific papers.
smithery integration: Are there tools that could TEST these predictions? Search for simulation, computation, or data-access MCP servers.
Phase 5: VOID (Dokkado Ku -- Meta-Recursive Closure)
"Perceive that which cannot be seen."
Turn the kernel on itself:
Does the kernel explain WHY this pattern is universal?
Does it predict its OWN appearance across domains?
Does the process of finding it (this protocol) instantiate it?
If the kernel is truly universal, the hunt that found it should be an instance of it.
Output: Meta-recursive closure statement, or honest admission that closure fails (which is itself informative -- not all patterns are self-referential).