| name | cost-aware-llm-pipeline |
| description | Cost optimization patterns for LLM API usage — model routing by task complexity, budget tracking, retry logic, and prompt caching. |
Cost-Aware LLM Pipeline
Patterns for controlling LLM API costs while maintaining quality. Combines model routing, budget tracking, retry logic, and prompt caching into a composable pipeline.
When to Activate
- Building applications that call LLM APIs (Claude, GPT, etc.)
- Processing batches of items with varying complexity
- Need to stay within a budget for API spend
- Optimizing cost without sacrificing quality on complex tasks
- Designing a multi-model pipeline where simple classification tasks should use Haiku and complex reasoning tasks should escalate to Sonnet or Opus automatically
- Adding a hard budget cap to a batch processing job so it fails fast rather than silently overspending when processing hundreds or thousands of files
- Implementing prompt caching for a system prompt that is longer than 1024 tokens and is repeated on every API call in a high-volume pipeline
- Auditing an existing LLM integration that currently uses the most expensive model for all requests regardless of task complexity
Core Concepts
1. Model Routing by Task Complexity
Automatically select cheaper models for simple tasks, reserving expensive models for complex ones.
MODEL_SONNET = "claude-sonnet-latest"
MODEL_HAIKU = "claude-haiku-latest"
_SONNET_TEXT_THRESHOLD = 10_000
_SONNET_ITEM_THRESHOLD = 30
def select_model(
text_length: int,
item_count: int,
force_model: str | None = None,
) -> str:
"""Select model based on task complexity."""
if force_model is not None:
return force_model
if text_length >= _SONNET_TEXT_THRESHOLD or item_count >= _SONNET_ITEM_THRESHOLD:
return MODEL_SONNET
return MODEL_HAIKU
2. Immutable Cost Tracking
Track cumulative spend with frozen dataclasses. Each API call returns a new tracker — never mutates state.
from dataclasses import dataclass
@dataclass(frozen=True, slots=True)
class CostRecord:
model: str
input_tokens: int
output_tokens: int
cost_usd: float
@dataclass(frozen=True, slots=True)
class CostTracker:
budget_limit: float = 1.00
records: tuple[CostRecord, ...] = ()
def add(self, record: CostRecord) -> "CostTracker":
"""Return new tracker with added record (never mutates self)."""
return CostTracker(
budget_limit=self.budget_limit,
records=(*self.records, record),
)
@property
def total_cost(self) -> float:
return sum(r.cost_usd for r in self.records)
@property
def over_budget(self) -> bool:
return self.total_cost > self.budget_limit
3. Narrow Retry Logic
Retry only on transient errors. Fail fast on authentication or bad request errors.
from anthropic import (
APIConnectionError,
InternalServerError,
RateLimitError,
)
_RETRYABLE_ERRORS = (APIConnectionError, RateLimitError, InternalServerError)
_MAX_RETRIES = 3
def call_with_retry(func, *, max_retries: int = _MAX_RETRIES):
"""Retry only on transient errors, fail fast on others."""
for attempt in range(max_retries):
try:
return func()
except _RETRYABLE_ERRORS:
if attempt == max_retries - 1:
raise
time.sleep(2 ** attempt)
4. Prompt Caching
Cache long system prompts to avoid resending them on every request.
Requirements:
- Minimum cacheable block: 1024 tokens (~750 words)
- Cache TTL: 5 minutes (ephemeral) — reset on each cache hit
- Savings: 90% discount on cached input tokens (pay only 10%)
- Latency savings: 2–5× faster responses on cache hits
What to cache:
- System prompts (instructions, rules, persona)
- Tool definitions / schemas
- Large static context (codebase summaries, documentation)
- Few-shot examples that repeat across requests
What NOT to cache:
- The variable user input (changes each request)
- Session-specific context that changes frequently
messages = [
{
"role": "user",
"content": [
{
"type": "text",
"text": system_prompt,
"cache_control": {"type": "ephemeral"},
},
{
"type": "text",
"text": few_shot_examples,
"cache_control": {"type": "ephemeral"},
},
{
"type": "text",
"text": user_input,
},
],
}
]
response = client.messages.create(model=model, messages=messages, max_tokens=1024)
usage = response.usage
cache_read = getattr(usage, 'cache_read_input_tokens', 0)
cache_write = getattr(usage, 'cache_creation_input_tokens', 0)
print(f"Cache hit: {cache_read} tokens | Cache write: {cache_write} tokens")
const response = await client.messages.create({
model,
max_tokens: 1024,
messages: [{
role: 'user',
content: [
{ type: 'text', text: systemPrompt, cache_control: { type: 'ephemeral' } },
{ type: 'text', text: userInput },
],
}],
});
const { cache_read_input_tokens, cache_creation_input_tokens } = response.usage;
Multi-turn conversations — cache the growing history:
def build_cached_conversation(history: list[dict], new_user_message: str) -> list[dict]:
if not history:
return [{"role": "user", "content": new_user_message}]
cached_history = history[:-1] + [{
**history[-1],
"content": [
{"type": "text", "text": history[-1]["content"],
"cache_control": {"type": "ephemeral"}},
] if isinstance(history[-1]["content"], str) else history[-1]["content"],
}]
return cached_history + [{"role": "user", "content": new_user_message}]
Expected savings for a 2000-token system prompt at 1000 requests/day:
| Scenario | Daily input tokens | Daily cost (Sonnet) |
|---|
| No caching | 2,000,000 | $6.00 |
| With caching (90% hit rate) | 200,000 cache + 2M original writes | ~$0.90 |
| Savings | | ~$5.10/day |
Composition
Combine all four techniques in a single pipeline function:
def process(text: str, config: Config, tracker: CostTracker) -> tuple[Result, CostTracker]:
model = select_model(len(text), estimated_items, config.force_model)
if tracker.over_budget:
raise BudgetExceededError(tracker.total_cost, tracker.budget_limit)
response = call_with_retry(lambda: client.messages.create(
model=model,
messages=build_cached_messages(system_prompt, text),
))
record = CostRecord(model=model, input_tokens=..., output_tokens=..., cost_usd=...)
tracker = tracker.add(record)
return parse_result(response), tracker
Pricing Reference (2025-2026)
| Model | Input ($/1M tokens) | Output ($/1M tokens) | Relative Cost |
|---|
| Claude Haiku (fast tier) | $0.80 | $4.00 | 1x |
| Claude Sonnet (balanced tier) | $3.00 | $15.00 | ~4x |
| Claude Opus (most capable tier) | $15.00 | $75.00 | ~19x |
Best Practices
- Start with the cheapest model and only route to expensive models when complexity thresholds are met
- Set explicit budget limits before processing batches — fail early rather than overspend
- Log model selection decisions so you can tune thresholds based on real data
- Use prompt caching for system prompts over 1024 tokens — saves both cost and latency
- Never retry on authentication or validation errors — only transient failures (network, rate limit, server error)
Anti-Patterns to Avoid
- Using the most expensive model for all requests regardless of complexity
- Retrying on all errors (wastes budget on permanent failures)
- Mutating cost tracking state (makes debugging and auditing difficult)
- Hardcoding model names throughout the codebase (use constants or config)
- Ignoring prompt caching for repetitive system prompts
When to Use
- Any application calling Claude, OpenAI, or similar LLM APIs
- Batch processing pipelines where cost adds up quickly
- Multi-model architectures that need intelligent routing
- Production systems that need budget guardrails