| name | vcdebrief |
| description | Debrief a VC meeting and produce a follow-up email, open diligence queue, and next-step recommendation. Usage: /vcdebrief <vcmatch-report.md>. Reads STARTUP_PROFILE.md and the vcmatch report. Saves to vcdebrief-<fund>.md. |
| license | MIT |
| allowed-tools | Read Write |
| metadata | {"author":"3Flux","version":"1.0","workflow-step":"9 — run after /vcprep, after the meeting"} |
/vcdebrief — Post-Meeting Debrief
Turn your raw meeting memory into a structured debrief: a signal read, an open diligence queue, a send-ready follow-up email, and a clear recommended next step.
Invocation
/vcdebrief <vcmatch-report.md>
Example: /vcdebrief vcmatch-a16z.md
Execution Steps
Step 1 — Load Context
Read two files:
STARTUP_PROFILE.md — extract: company name, founder names, raise amount, key traction points
- The vcmatch report passed as argument — extract:
- Fund name and target partner name
- Fit Score and Recommended Action
- Diligence questions listed in the report (the ones the fund was predicted to ask)
- Red flags identified in the report
- Optimal pitch angle and opening hook
Derive fund slug and output filename: vcmatch-a16z.md → fund = a16z, output = vcdebrief-a16z.md
If either file is missing, stop and tell the user which file to provide.
Step 2 — Gather Meeting Notes
Ask the user:
"Describe what happened in the meeting. Include as much as you can remember:
- Who was in the room (names, titles)
- Approximately how long it ran
- Questions they asked — exact wording if you remember it
- What they reacted positively to (leaned in, followed up, wrote something down)
- What they pushed back on or questioned
- Any signals about their interest level (tone, pace, next steps they mentioned)
- Anything surprising — questions you didn't expect, topics they raised unprompted"
Wait for the user's response before continuing. Do not proceed with a placeholder.
Step 3 — Analyze the Meeting
Map the user's notes against the vcmatch report:
Diligence prediction accuracy:
- Which predicted diligence questions actually came up? Which didn't?
- What new questions emerged that the vcmatch didn't anticipate?
Signal classification:
- Green signals: things they reacted positively to, questions that showed interest, next-step offers
- Yellow signals: surface-level engagement, polite skepticism, short follow-up questions
- Red signals: direct challenges, unanswered objections, signals of misalignment ("that's not really our area")
Pitch landing assessment:
- Did the vcmatch opening hook land? Did they engage with the pitch angle?
- Which red flags from the vcmatch came up? Were they addressed?
- What surprised you — positively or negatively — compared to what the vcmatch predicted?
Step 4 — Draft Follow-Up Email
Write a send-ready follow-up email to the target partner. Rules:
- Send within 24 hours — the subject line should signal immediacy without being desperate
- Subject: ≤8 words — reference something specific from the meeting, not a generic "Following up"
- Body: 4–6 sentences
- One sentence of genuine gratitude — reference something specific they said or asked
- One sentence that reinforces the thesis alignment that resonated most
- One or two sentences that address any open diligence items they raised — with brief answers or offers to send materials
- Clear next step ask — specific (second call, partner meeting, data room access) with a soft time anchor
Format:
Subject: [subject line]
[Body — 4–6 sentences]
[Founder Name]
[Title], [Company]
[Website]
Step 5 — Produce Output and Save
Write the full debrief to vcdebrief-<fund>.md using the output format in references/output-format.md.
Then tell the user:
- "Send the follow-up email within 24 hours — response rate drops sharply after that."
- "Run
/vctrack to update your pipeline view."
- If Recommended Next Step is "Drop Fund": "This one looks like a no — move your energy to the next fund on the list."
Output Rules
- The Signal Read must be grounded in the user's actual notes — no invented signals
- The Diligence Queue table must only include questions that were actually raised in the meeting, plus any from the vcmatch that remain open
- The follow-up email must reference something specific from the meeting — never a generic opener
- The Recommended Next Step must be one of the five defined options (see output format) — do not invent new categories
- Updated Fit Signal must honestly reflect what the meeting revealed — it is allowed to be worse than the vcmatch prediction
- Word budget: ≤1,400 words total across all sections