| name | tufte-viz |
| description | Ideate and critique data visualizations using Edward Tufte's principles from "The Visual Display of Quantitative Information." Use this skill when:
(1) Designing new data visualizations or charts
(2) Critiquing or improving existing visualizations
(3) Reviewing dashboards or reports for graphical integrity
(4) Deciding between visualization approaches
(5) Reducing chartjunk or improving data-ink ratio
(6) Planning small multiples or high-density displays
Applies principles: data-ink ratio, chartjunk elimination, graphical integrity, lie factor, small multiples, and data density.
|
Tufte Visualization Ideation
Apply Edward Tufte's principles to design clear, honest, high-density data visualizations.
Workflow
For new visualizations:
-
Clarify the data story
- What comparisons matter?
- What's the key insight to communicate?
- Who's the audience?
-
Select approach using Tufte principles:
- High comparison need → Small multiples
- Dense data → Consider data tables, sparklines
- Time-series → Line charts with minimal grid
- Part-to-whole → Avoid pie charts; prefer bar/table
-
Design with data-ink in mind
- Start minimal, add only what's necessary
- Every element must earn its ink
- Default to grayscale; use color purposefully
-
Apply the eraser test before shipping
- For every element (label, tick, gridline, border, annotation): can it be erased without losing information that's not already conveyed elsewhere?
- Watch for duplicate encodings: numeric labels next to a value already marked by a tick; legends duplicating direct labels; per-panel scale annotations duplicating a shared-scale caption.
- If two elements compete for the same job, keep the visual one and drop the textual one (or vice versa) — not both.
-
Apply the collision test before shipping
- For every text element in the plot (axis labels, point annotations, epoch labels, baseline labels, explanatory notes): mentally draw its bounding box. Does anything else — another text element, a data line, dense markers — live in or cross that box?
- The eraser test catches redundant elements; the collision test catches crowded ones. Both must pass.
- Standard fixes: move explanatory prose out of the plot into the figcaption; relocate band/epoch labels to a dedicated strip above the plot; push baseline/reference labels to the outside margin; give each in-plot annotation a leader line so the marker and the text occupy clearly separated space.
- Watch especially: inverted axes (top of plot is now where extreme values cluster, where annotations also want to go); shared-scale small multiples (labels stacked near zero in every panel); dense scatter (text vanishes into the dot cloud unless explicitly cleared).
-
Apply the Tufte test (see references/tufte-principles.md)
For critiquing visualizations:
-
Check graphical integrity
- Calculate lie factor if proportions seem off
- Verify baselines and scales
- Look for 3D distortion
-
Identify chartjunk
- Decorative elements
- Heavy grids
- Unnecessary 3D effects
- Moiré patterns
-
Evaluate data-ink ratio
- What can be erased?
- What's redundant?
-
Suggest improvements with specific before/after recommendations
Key Principles Reference
references/tufte-principles.md — core principles from Visual Display of Quantitative Information: lie factor, data-ink, chartjunk, small multiples, integrity.references/analytical-design.md — extensions from Envisioning Information, Visual Explanations, and Beautiful Evidence: the 6 principles of analytical design, sparklines, layering & separation, micro/macro, range-frames, causality, confections. Load when designing dashboards, dense displays, sparklines, or explanatory graphics.
Quick checklist:
Source
