manage-publications

name	manage-publications
description	Manage academic paper publication workflows - track publication status across platforms (Zenodo, SSRN, arXiv, journals), generate PDFs, and update publication URLs in Quarto configs

Publication Management Skill

This skill manages publication workflows for Quarto-based academic papers in this project.

When to Use

Activate this skill when the user:

• Asks to check publication status ("what's the status of my papers?")
• Wants to generate PDFs ("generate PDFs for all papers")
• Needs to update publication URLs or status ("I just uploaded to SSRN")
• Requests a publication TODO list ("what publications are pending?")
• Mentions preprints, journals, or publication platforms

Publications in This Project

Papers are auto-discovered from _quarto-*.yml config files using discover_paper_configs() from scripts/lib/quarto_config_utils.py. Non-paper configs (manual, book, test, base, shared-defaults) are automatically excluded.

To see the current list of papers:

python scripts/publish-zenodo.py --list

Configuration Location

Each publication has a _quarto-*.yml file in the project root containing:

• Path: metadata.publishing section
• Structure:
  • own-site: {url, status}
  • preprints: [{platform, status, url, doi}]
  • journals: [{name, tier, status, url}]

Important: Exclude files in _build_temp/ - those are build artifacts.

Core Workflows

1. Show Publication Status

When requested, display status for all papers:

Publication Status
─────────────────────────────────────────

Economics Paper (1% Treaty)
  Config: _quarto-1-pct-treaty-impact.yml
  ✓ Own Site: deployed (https://impact.warondisease.org)
  ✓ Zenodo: auto-uploaded (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18161561)
  ⏳ SSRN: pending
  ⏳ arXiv: pending
  📋 Journals: 3 targets (Health Affairs, Value in Health, PLOS Medicine)

IAB Paper
  Config: _quarto-iab.yml
  ✓ Own Site: deployed (https://iab.warondisease.org)
  ✓ Zenodo: auto-uploaded (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18203222)
  ⏳ SSRN: pending
  ⏳ arXiv: pending
  📋 Journals: 6 targets (AER, JPE, Public Choice, ...)

[... continue for all 6 papers]

How to do it:

1. Use Glob to find all _quarto-*.yml files in project root
2. Read each file and extract metadata.publishing section
3. Display status with clear visual indicators:
   • ✓ for deployed/auto-uploaded/published
   • ⏳ for pending/target
   • 📋 for lists

2. Generate Publication TODO List

When requested, show actionable checklist of pending items:

Publication TODO List
═════════════════════════════════════════

PREPRINTS (High Priority - Week 1-2)
─────────────────────────────────────────

Economics Paper:
  [ ] Upload to SSRN (Social Science Research Network)
      Category: econ.GN (General Economics)
  [ ] Upload to arXiv (econ.GN category)

IAB Paper:
  [ ] Upload to SSRN (Political Economy category)
  [ ] Upload to arXiv (econ.GN or cs.GT - Game Theory)

Wishocracy Paper:
  [ ] Upload to SSRN (Political Science / Public Choice)
  [ ] Upload to arXiv (cs.GT - Game Theory)

dFDA Spec Paper:
  [ ] Upload to medRxiv (Health sciences preprint)
  [ ] Upload to arXiv (stat.ME - Methodology)

dFDA Impact Paper:
  [ ] Upload to medRxiv (Health sciences)
  [ ] Upload to SSRN (Health Economics)
  [ ] Upload to arXiv (econ.GN)

─────────────────────────────────────────
JOURNALS (Medium Priority - Week 4+)
─────────────────────────────────────────

Economics Paper:
  [ ] Submit to Health Affairs (Tier 1)
  [ ] Submit to Value in Health (Tier 2)
  [ ] Submit to PLOS Medicine (open access)

IAB Paper:
  [ ] Submit to Public Choice (Tier 2)
  [ ] Submit to American Economic Review (Tier 1)
  [ ] Submit to Journal of Political Economy (Tier 1)

[... continue for all papers]

═════════════════════════════════════════
Summary: 15 pending preprints, 18 journal targets

How to generate:

1. Read metadata.publishing from all configs
2. Filter for status: pending (preprints) or status: target (journals)
3. Group by priority:
   • High: Preprints (SSRN, arXiv, medRxiv, OSF)
   • Medium: Journal submissions
4. Include relevant metadata (categories, tier levels)

3. Generate PDFs with Review

IMPORTANT: PDFs for publication should include quality review!

Review Levels

Users can choose thoroughness:

A. Basic Review (~2-5 min/paper - fast):

User: Generate PDFs (basic review)
→ 1. Pre-render validation + auto-fixes
→ 2. PDF generation
→ 3. Post-render validation
→ 4. Brief report

B. Standard Review (~5-10 min/paper - recommended):

User: Generate PDFs for publication
→ 1. Pre-render validation + auto-fixes
→ 2. Citation verification
→ 3. PDF generation
→ 4. Post-render validation
→ 5. Review report

C. Comprehensive Review (~15-30 min/paper - pre-submission):

User: Generate PDFs with full review
→ 1. Pre-render validation + auto-fixes
→ 2. AI content quality review
→ 3. Parameter methodology critique
→ 4. Citation verification
→ 5. PDF generation
→ 6. Post-render validation
→ 7. Detailed review report

Standard Review Workflow (Default)

When user requests PDF generation, run Standard Review:

Step 1: Pre-Render Validation + Auto-Fixes

python scripts/pre-render-validation.py

• Detects: LaTeX errors, broken links, missing citations, unknown variables
• If errors found: Use /pre-render-validate skill to auto-fix
• Auto-fixable issues: ✅ LaTeX syntax errors ✅ Missing image references ✅ Broken cross-reference links ✅ Unknown variables ✅ Hardcoded numbers ✅ Missing citations ✅ GIF file wrapping ✅ Python syntax errors

Step 2: Citation Verification

• Use /verify-and-add-sources skill
• Ensures all claims properly cited
• Searches for missing sources
• Adds references to bibliography

Step 3: PDF Generation

python scripts/render-quarto.py <project> --to pdf

• Includes built-in Python code leakage validation

Step 4: Post-Render Validation

python scripts/post-render-validation.py

• Checks rendered HTML for issues
• Validates: broken links, unrendered expressions, formatting

Step 5: Review Report Display publication readiness report with findings from all stages.

Comprehensive Review (Optional Steps)

For comprehensive review, add between Step 1 and Step 2:

Content Quality Review:

• Use /review-qmd skill on main paper file
• Checks: clarity, engagement, rigor, structure, tone
• Generates improvement suggestions
• Optional: apply improvements

Parameter Methodology Critique:

• Use /critique-calculation skill for key parameters
• Validates formulas, empirical backing, uncertainty
• Identifies weaknesses and improvements

Example Output

Generating PDFs with Standard Review...

[1/6] Economics Paper (1% Treaty)
═══════════════════════════════════════════

[Step 1/5] Pre-Render Validation
  Running: python scripts/pre-render-validation.py
  ✓ No LaTeX errors
  ✓ All images found
  ✓ All cross-references valid
  ⚠ 3 citations missing - Running auto-fix...
  ✓ Auto-fixed 3 missing citations

[Step 2/5] Citation Verification
  Running: /verify-and-add-sources skill
  ✓ All 47 claims properly cited
  ✓ Bibliography complete

[Step 3/5] PDF Generation
  Running: python scripts/render-quarto.py economics --to pdf
  ✓ Generated: _site/1-pct-treaty-impact/economics-paper.pdf (1.3 MB)
  ✓ No Python code leakage detected

[Step 4/5] Post-Render Validation
  Running: python scripts/post-render-validation.py
  ✓ All internal links functional
  ✓ No unrendered expressions
  ✓ PDF navbar links valid

[Step 5/5] Review Report
─────────────────────────────────────────
PUBLICATION READINESS: ✓ READY
Minor warnings: None
Critical errors: None
PDF ready for upload to SSRN, arXiv, journals
─────────────────────────────────────────

[2/6] IAB Paper
═══════════════════════════════════════════
[... continues for all papers]

How to Implement

1. Detect review level from user request:

   • "basic review" → Basic
   • "full review" / "comprehensive" → Comprehensive
   • Default → Standard

2. Run validation pipeline:

   # Step 1: Pre-render validation
   subprocess.run(['python', 'scripts/pre-render-validation.py'])
   # If errors: use /pre-render-validate skill
   
   # Step 2 (Standard+): Citation verification
   # Use /verify-and-add-sources skill
   
   # Steps for Comprehensive only:
   # Use /review-qmd skill
   # Use /critique-calculation skill
   
   # Step 3: Generate PDF
   subprocess.run(['python', 'scripts/render-quarto.py', project, '--to', 'pdf'])
   
   # Step 4: Post-render validation
   subprocess.run(['python', 'scripts/post-render-validation.py'])
   

3. Compile review report with findings from all stages

4. Show review report and ask user if they want to:

   • Proceed with upload (if clean)
   • Fix warnings manually (if warnings)
   • Fix critical errors (if errors found)

4. Update Publication Metadata (Interactive)

When user reports uploading a paper, guide them through updating the config:

Example conversation:

User: I just uploaded the economics paper to SSRN
Claude: Great! Let me update the config. What's the SSRN URL?
User: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1234567
Claude: Should I change the status from "pending" to "submitted"?
User: Yes
Claude: [Shows preview of changes]

Preview of changes to _quarto-1-pct-treaty-impact.yml:
───────────────────────────────────────────
  preprints:
    - platform: ssrn
-     status: pending
+     status: submitted
-     url: ""
+     url: "https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1234567"

Apply these changes? (y/n)
User: y
Claude: ✓ Updated _quarto-1-pct-treaty-impact.yml

How to update YAML:

CRITICAL SAFETY RULES:

1. Always preview changes before writing
2. Wait for user confirmation
3. Use ruamel.yaml to preserve formatting (NOT PyYAML)
4. Only modify metadata.publishing section
5. Verify the file parses after changes

Update workflow:

1. Read the appropriate _quarto-*.yml file
2. Navigate to metadata.publishing section
3. Find the specific platform or journal entry
4. Update the relevant fields (status, url, doi)
5. Show diff preview
6. Get user confirmation
7. Write changes using Edit tool
8. Verify file still parses correctly

Status values:

• deployed - Own site is live
• auto-uploaded - Zenodo automated upload
• pending - Not yet uploaded
• submitted - Uploaded/submitted but not published
• published - Published and live
• target - Journal target (not yet submitted)
• rejected - Submission rejected

Implementation Notes

Discovery Pattern

# Find all Quarto config files (exclude build artifacts)
import glob
configs = [
    f for f in glob.glob('_quarto-*.yml')
    if '_build_temp' not in f
]

YAML Parsing (If Helper Script Needed)

Use ruamel.yaml to preserve formatting:

from ruamel.yaml import YAML

yaml = YAML()
yaml.preserve_quotes = True
yaml.default_flow_style = False

# Read
with open(config_file, 'r', encoding='utf-8') as f:
    config = yaml.load(f)

# Access publishing metadata
publishing = config['metadata']['publishing']

# Modify
for preprint in publishing['preprints']:
    if preprint['platform'] == 'ssrn':
        preprint['status'] = 'submitted'
        preprint['url'] = new_url

# Write (preserves original formatting)
with open(config_file, 'w', encoding='utf-8') as f:
    yaml.dump(config, f)

PDF Output Paths

Each project has its PDF specified in the config under dih-render.pdf-output-file:

• Book: How-to-End-War-and-Disease.pdf
• Economics: economics-paper.pdf
• IAB: incentive-alignment-bonds-paper.pdf
• Wishocracy: wishocracy-rappa-paper.pdf
• dFDA Spec: dfda-spec-paper.pdf
• dFDA Impact: dfda-impact-paper.pdf

All PDFs are output to _site/<project-name>/ directory.

Publication Platforms Reference

Preprint Servers

• Zenodo: Auto-uploaded via GitHub Actions, assigns DOI
• SSRN: Social Science Research Network (economics, political science)
• arXiv: Physics, math, CS, econ (requires category)
• medRxiv: Health sciences preprints
• OSF Preprints: Open Science Framework

Journal Categories by Paper

• Economics: Health Affairs, Value in Health, The Lancet, BMJ, PLOS Medicine
• IAB: AER, JPE, Public Choice, Games & Economic Behavior, J. Public Econ
• Wishocracy: APSR, J. Politics, Social Choice & Welfare, Public Choice
• dFDA Spec: Clinical Pharm & Therapeutics, Pharmacoepidemiology, Drug Safety
• dFDA Impact: Health Affairs, Value in Health, PharmacoEconomics

Examples

Example 1: Check Status

User: What's the publication status?
-> Skill displays status table for all discovered papers

Example 2: Generate PDFs

User: Generate PDFs for all papers
→ Skill runs render-quarto.py for each project
→ Reports success and file locations

Example 3: Update After Upload

User: I uploaded dFDA spec to medRxiv: https://medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2025.01.15.12345678
→ Skill identifies dFDA spec paper
→ Updates medRxiv preprint entry
→ Changes status to "submitted"
→ Adds URL
→ Previews changes
→ Updates _quarto-dfda-spec.yml after confirmation

Example 4: TODO List

User: What do I need to publish next?
→ Skill generates TODO list
→ Prioritizes preprints first
→ Shows 15 pending preprints, 18 journal targets
→ Includes submission categories and tiers

Tips for Success

1. Always show before changing: Preview YAML diffs before writing
2. Be specific: When updating, confirm which paper and platform
3. Context matters: Reference paper titles and DOIs for clarity
4. File safety: Only modify metadata.publishing, never other sections
5. Verify: After updates, confirm file still parses correctly
6. Batch operations: When generating PDFs, do all at once for efficiency

Future Enhancements

• Automated peer review before submission
• Bulk status updates via CSV import
• Integration with Zenodo API to auto-fetch DOIs
• Journal submission checklist generator
• Citation count tracking from Google Scholar