Menu
Reviews logical coherence of hypothesis conclusions, limitations handling, and contribution-evidence alignment
Install with Codex or Claude Copy this prompt, paste it into Codex, Claude, or another assistant, and let it review the skill page and install it for you.
Based on SOC occupation classification
Reference for configuring, launching, and monitoring research iteration loops and analysis polish loops
Verifies the analysis pipeline runs end-to-end, outputs match expectations, and LaTeX compiles
Hands-on QA of the research analysis pipeline. Use whenever the user asks to verify the pipeline end-to-end, check output file integrity, validate table and figure generation, test data processing, or verify LaTeX compilation. Triggers on phrases like "test the pipeline", "QA the analysis", "check the outputs", "verify the tables", "run end-to-end", "does the paper compile", or any request to validate a research pipeline.
Define research question, hypotheses, methodology outline, and literature gap
Decompose a research question into cook-it-ready epic beads with methodology specifications
Comprehensive playbook for building rigorous, publication-quality research papers. Covers the full research output sequence from paper structure and statistical reporting through table formatting, figure design, LaTeX conventions, academic writing quality, and pre-submission review.
| name | Argumentation Coherence Reviewer |
| description | Reviews logical coherence of hypothesis conclusions, limitations handling, and contribution-evidence alignment |
Review-phase role evaluating the logical coherence of the paper's argumentation across all sections, from hypothesis formulation through to contribution claims.
Share findings via SendMessage: statistical interpretation issues go to statistical-methods-reviewer; framing inconsistencies go to theoretical-framing-reviewer.
AgentTeam member in the review phase. Spawned via TeamCreate. Communicate with teammates via SendMessage.
