with one click
check-ci
Monitor CI/CD pipeline status after pushes and investigate failures.
Install with Codex or Claude Copy this prompt, paste it into Codex, Claude, or another assistant, and let it review the skill page and install it for you.
Menu
Monitor CI/CD pipeline status after pushes and investigate failures.
Install with Codex or Claude Copy this prompt, paste it into Codex, Claude, or another assistant, and let it review the skill page and install it for you.
Based on SOC occupation classification
Manual E2E tester that starts the app and exercises new features end-to-end
Generate a single self-contained HTML page that is genuinely visual AND interactive — charts, diagrams, motion, tabs, comparison toggles, click-to-expand, base64-inlined images, opinionated typography. Use whenever the user wants ANY rich visual artifact from arbitrary content: explainer, research write-up, PRD or spec page, pitch, internal one-pager, "make this less boring" rebuild, scroll-snap deck, landing-style summary, distilled report. Trigger phrasings: "make me a page about X", "turn this PDF/doc into something visual", "build me a deck/talk/pitch", "explain Y in a visual way", "make this readable", "give it some eye candy", "I want something I can show the team", "less boring version of this", "rebuild that page", "redo it with more visuals". Output is one .html file that renders identically when DM'd — CDN libraries (Tailwind, Chart.js, D3, GSAP, Mermaid, Lucide) load from stable jsdelivr/unpkg URLs; every image is base64-inlined. Not for plain Markdown docs (use technical-writer), not for code revi
Vision-based visual QA reviewer — captures rendered output (live web pages, static HTML artifacts, PDFs) as screenshots, inspects them with a designer's eye for layout defects a human catches instantly, and normalizes findings into the verify pipeline format
Independent second-opinion reviewer that shells out to the local Codex CLI for a broad code review, then normalizes findings into the verify pipeline format
Comment-hygiene-only reviewer — flags ephemeral review-ID references, historical change-narration, stale comments, reviewer-appeasement, and redundant restating in the scoped diff, and normalizes findings into the verify pipeline format
Adversarial cooperation loop — player implements, /verify reviews, creates PR, passes CI
| name | check-ci |
| description | Monitor CI/CD pipeline status after pushes and investigate failures. |
| argument-hint | [optional: commit-sha or branch] |
| allowed-tools | ["Read","Bash","Grep","Glob","Skill"] |
Monitor CI/CD pipeline status after pushing commits. When failures occur, delegate to the debugger skill for systematic investigation and evidence-based root cause analysis.
Optional commit reference: $ARGUMENTS (e.g., HEAD, abc1234, feature-branch)
debugger to investigateThe command automatically detects the CI/CD platform by examining configuration files:
GitHub Actions
.github/workflows/*.yml or .github/workflows/*.yamlgh CLI for API accessGitLab CI
.gitlab-ci.ymlglab CLI for API accessCircleCI
.circleci/config.ymlJenkins
Jenkinsfile or .jenkinsTravis CI
.travis.ymlAzure DevOps
azure-pipelines.yml# Get latest commit
git rev-parse HEAD
# Get commit details
git log -1 --format="%H %s"
# Check push status
git log origin/[branch]..HEAD
For GitHub Actions:
# List workflow runs for commit
gh run list --commit [SHA]
# Get run details
gh run view [RUN_ID]
# Watch run status
gh run watch [RUN_ID]
For GitLab CI:
# Get pipeline for commit
glab ci list --per-page 1
# View pipeline details
glab ci view [PIPELINE_ID]
# Get job logs
glab ci trace [JOB_ID]
Display status updates every 5-10 seconds:
⏳ CI Status: In Progress
✓ Build: Success
⏳ Tests: Running... (2m 15s)
⏳ Lint: Queued
- Deploy: Pending
When CI fails, delegate investigation to the debugger skill:
Use the Skill tool to invoke debugger with:
Example prompt:
Investigate CI failure for commit [SHA]:
- Failed jobs: [job names]
- CI platform: [GitHub Actions/GitLab CI/etc]
- Job logs available via: [command to fetch logs]
Please gather evidence about:
1. What specifically failed (tests, build, lint, etc.)
2. Exact error messages and stack traces
3. Which files/changes are involved
4. Root cause based on evidence
Provide a complete investigation report.
The debugger skill will:
✅ CI Status: All checks passed!
📊 Summary:
✓ Build: Success (1m 23s)
✓ Tests: 156 passed (2m 45s)
✓ Lint: No issues (0m 15s)
✓ Security: No vulnerabilities (0m 38s)
🎉 Your code is ready to merge!
❌ CI Status: Failed
📊 Summary:
✓ Build: Success (1m 23s)
❌ Tests: 2 failed, 154 passed (2m 45s)
⚠️ Lint: 3 warnings (0m 15s)
✓ Security: No vulnerabilities (0m 38s)
🔍 Launching `debugger` to investigate...
Then present the skill's complete investigation report, which will include:
The skill's report provides evidence-based findings without implementing fixes.
Users can customize behavior via environment variables:
CI_CHECK_TIMEOUT: Maximum time to wait for CI completion (default: 30m)CI_POLL_INTERVAL: How often to check status (default: 10s)debugger immediatelydebugger:
# Check CI for latest commit
/check-ci
# Check CI for specific commit
/check-ci abc1234
# Check CI for a branch
/check-ci feature/new-api