Menu
Crash-recovery test for the sagaflow generic interpreter. Multiple sequential tool calls with a sleep in the middle.
Install with Codex or Claude Copy this prompt, paste it into Codex, Claude, or another assistant, and let it review the skill page and install it for you.
Based on SOC occupation classification
Convene the 18-member Council of High Intelligence — simulate multi-persona deliberation from Aristotle, Feynman, Torvalds, Taleb, Kahneman, and 13 others, then synthesize into ONE verdict. Use when facing hard decisions, design tradeoffs, strategy questions, or when you want diverse adversarial perspectives on a problem. Trigger on "/council", "ask the council", "what would the council say", "multi-perspective analysis". Supports --quick (fast), --duo (dialectic pair), --triad <domain>, --full (all 18), --members a,b,c.
Finds viable product, business, or project ideas in any domain by generating candidates, rigorously validating each against real competitors and market data, and killing weak ideas with documented reasons. Two modes — fast batch generate-and-kill (default), or `--deep` DFS that branches a single space into opportunity tuples with codex cross-attack, mandatory steelman, and a VC-gauntlet fundability gate. Use when the user asks to brainstorm ideas, find market gaps, identify business opportunities, figure out what to build, come up with side project ideas, find underserved niches, or (with --deep) "find the real opportunities in X", "exhaustively explore X", "keep digging until you exhaust X". Works for SaaS, open source, MCP servers, apps, tools, APIs, or any product category.
Stress-test a startup/product proposal like a top-tier VC partner meeting — reality-checked against real market data, with an independent codex devil's-advocate bear case — then iterate hardened rewrites to a GO / CONDITIONAL-GO / NO-GO verdict. Use when the user says "vc review", "is this fundable", "would a VC fund this", "tear apart my startup idea", "pitch critique", "investor lens", "gauntlet this", "red-team my startup", "poke holes in my idea". Also the fundability gate invoked by opportunity-dfs §8.
The single entry point for ALL design and specification work. Use when designing, specifying, architecting, writing a spec, RFC, design doc, or drafting a design for any system, feature, product, protocol, game, or workflow. Trigger phrases include "design this", "architect this", "design spec", "design review", "write a spec", "technical spec", "RFC", "API design", "data model", and "implementation spec". Default mode: adversarial stress-testing with parallel critics. Use `--spec` for lightweight single-session spec document generation without critics.
Use when researching, investigating, or exploring a topic systematically with orthogonal multi-dimensional coverage and source-quality tiers. Trigger phrases include "research this deeply", "deep research on", "investigate this topic thoroughly", "explore this topic", "systematic research", "multi-dimensional research", "comprehensive research", "cover all angles of", "thorough research on", "deep dive into (research)", "exhaustive research". Spawns parallel agents across WHO/WHAT/HOW/WHERE/WHEN/WHY/LIMITS with risk-stratified spot-checking. Bounded by a user-controlled round budget with honest coverage reporting on what was and wasn't covered.
Use when the user says "autopilot", "build this", "make it", "ship it", "just do it", "do it", "implement this", or gives a vague idea, spec, task list, or bug fix and expects autonomous execution. Handles decomposition, agent coordination, and verification automatically. "build me end to end", "go from idea to code", "do everything", "run this autonomously". Follows the Spec-Driven Development workflow: specify → clarify → plan → tasks → analyze → implement.
| name | gen-crash-test |
| description | Crash-recovery test for the sagaflow generic interpreter. Multiple sequential tool calls with a sleep in the middle. |
| user_invocable | true |
| argument | --arg name=<someone> |
| category | meta |
| capabilities | ["temporal-workflow"] |
| sagaflow_only | true |
| input_types | ["git-diff"] |
| output_types | ["report","code"] |
| complexity | moderate |
| cost_profile | low |
| maturity | beta |
| metadata_source | inferred |
Crash-recovery test for the sagaflow generic interpreter's crash-recovery and sequential tool execution. It requires sagaflow — there is no in-session fallback because the test target is the sagaflow interpreter itself.
Run sagaflow doctor. If Temporal is unreachable, stop immediately and report:
gen-crash-test requires a running sagaflow worker (Temporal backend). Run
temporal server start-devandsagaflow worker run, then retry.
Do NOT attempt an in-session workaround — this skill tests sagaflow, not Claude Code tools.
Execute these three steps IN ORDER, one at a time, waiting for each tool result before the next:
write_artifact with path step1.md content Step 1 complete for $name.bash with command sleep 6 && echo 'slept 6s' and a 30s timeout.write_artifact with path step3.md content Step 3 complete for $name — all steps survived!.After step 3, end your turn. One text summary, no more tool calls.