| name | validate-review |
| description | Validate that review findings are accurate and actionable. Use when asked to "validate review", "check if review findings are correct", "verify review accuracy", or when confirming that a review's claims match actual code state.
|
| argument-hint | [review report path or PR number] |
Validate Review
Confirm that review findings are accurate, not false positives, and actionable.
Process
- Read each finding from the review
- Verify against actual code: Does the issue actually exist at the referenced location?
- Check context: Is the reviewer missing context that explains the pattern?
- Classify each finding:
- Confirmed: issue exists as described
- False positive: issue does not exist or is already handled
- Needs context: finding is technically correct but justified by design
- Report which findings are valid, which are not, and why
When to Use
- Before spending time fixing review findings, validate them first
- When a review seems overly harsh or many findings feel wrong
- After an automated review (bots may miss context humans would catch)
- When review findings conflict with each other
Output
- Per-finding validation status (confirmed, false positive, needs context)
- Evidence for each determination (code references, design docs)
- Recommended action for each finding