| name | enablement-impact-story |
| description | Create leadership-ready ROI stories that explain enablement impact with evidence, assumptions, and risks. Use when the user asks for an enablement impact story, executive summary, board-ready narrative, or initiative outcome update tied to performance and strategic priorities. Route metric design and instrumentation setup to enablement-metrics-and-instrumentation. |
Enablement Impact Story
Build a credible impact narrative that leadership can use for decisions.
Confirm Inputs First
Confirm:
- Initiatives in scope
- Baseline and current performance data
- Time period
- Audience and decision context
- Known assumptions and other factors that may have influenced results
- Whether a current context artifact from
revenue-enablement-context exists
If critical evidence is missing, ask for the smallest set needed to avoid speculative claims.
Read The Right Reference
Read references/impact-story-template.md before drafting.
Default Workflow
- Reuse current
revenue-enablement-context if available; otherwise label foundational assumptions.
- Define the decision context and what leadership needs to decide.
- Summarize the enablement work, the behavior shift, and the time period.
- Show baseline, current state, and the main proof points.
- Separate observed results from interpretation.
- State assumptions and limits on what the evidence can support.
- Add a
decisions to make now section with options and trade-offs.
- Recommend next actions for the next quarter.
- Produce an executive-ready summary and a simple evidence appendix.
What To Avoid
- Overstating causality when the evidence is directional.
- Burying critical caveats in appendix notes.
- Failing to convert the story into clear leadership decisions.
- Mixing observation and recommendation in the same claim.
Tool Notes
- Keep narrative structure tool-agnostic.
- If needed, adapt output into the user's memo, slide, or dashboard workflow.
Output Contract
Default output includes:
- Executive summary narrative
- Evidence table with confidence labels
- Assumptions and limits section
- Decisions to make now with options and trade-offs
- Recommended next actions
- Optional appendix outline for deeper review
Quality Bar
- Story is evidence-led and avoids overclaiming causality.
- Confidence levels are explicit and defensible.
- Leadership can act on the recommendations immediately.
- Narrative remains concise while preserving key caveats.
- Decision options are explicit enough for sponsor-level review.
