Menu
Use for code review, quality audits, SOLID/DRY consistency checks, pattern audits across the codebase, or verifying anti-pattern compliance across a scope.
Install with Codex or Claude Copy this prompt, paste it into Codex, Claude, or another assistant, and let it review the skill page and install it for you.
Based on SOC occupation classification
| name | code-check |
| description | Use for code review, quality audits, SOLID/DRY consistency checks, pattern audits across the codebase, or verifying anti-pattern compliance across a scope. |
| user-invocable | true |
| argument-hint | scope: all | crate | path/to/dir |
| triggers | ["code quality check","audit the code","quality audit","anti-pattern scan","solid check"] |
Role: audit OCX code for Clean Code, SOLID, DRY, pattern consistency.
worker-reviewer agents per audit dimensionsubsystem-*.md rules still match current code.claude/rules/quality-core.md โ universal SOLID/DRY/YAGNI, severity tiers, review checklist.claude/rules/quality-rust.md โ Rust block/warn-tier anti-patterns (.unwrap(), MutexGuard, blocking I/O, .clone() discipline, JoinSet, bounded channels).claude/rules/arch-principles.md โ crate layout, pattern catalog, code style (descriptive type names, no mod.rs).claude/rules/subsystem-cli.md โ Printable single-table rule, Api flow.claude/rules/subsystem-package-manager.md โ three-layer error model, _all order preservation, task module discipline.claude/rules/subsystem-file-structure.md โ ReferenceManager usage, link() arg order.claude/rules/subsystem-package.md, subsystem-oci.md โ when auditing those areastask duplo:diff โ structural duplication scan (Rust-aware)cargo-geiger โ unsafe code auditcargo-bloat โ binary size hotspots## Codebase Health Report
### Executive Summary
**Health Score**: [A/B/C/D/F]
**Critical Issues**: [count]
### Pattern Violations
| Pattern | File:Line | Description | Remediation |
### SOLID Violations
| Principle | File:Line | Description | Remediation |
### Context Staleness
| Rule File | Stale Reference | Current State |
$ARGUMENTS
Use when a diff or PR is too big to review by eye and the question is "what should I actually look at" โ sorts each changed line into wire / CLI / API / logic / test / doc tiers, then opens a clickable local page with the real hunks. A reading order, never a verdict.
Use to implement a plan artifact from `/swarm-plan`, or a free-text implementation task with contract-first TDD + Review-Fix Loop. Tier (`low | auto | high | max`) scales builder model, loop rounds, review breadth, and Codex code-diff gate.
Use for branch, PR, or diff review before landing on main. Tier (`low | auto | high | max`) scales breadth from single reviewer to adversarial panel with architect + SOTA-gap + Codex cross-model gate. Triggers: "review", "/swarm-review", pre-merge checks.
Use when the user says "commit", "/commit", "save progress", or asks to land working changes on a feature or worktree branch. OCX working-phase posture โ minimises commit count, can amend rolling Checkpoints, offers a one-time PR prompt. For pre-merge cleanup, use `/finalize`.
Use for feature planning, task decomposition, multi-perspective research, or ADR scaffolding. Tier (`low | auto | high | max`) scales research depth, architect model, and review breadth. Canonical research primitive for AI config / ADR work.
Use when the user says "codex review", "/codex-adversary", "adversarial review", "cross-model review", or asks for a different-model second opinion on a diff or plan artifact. Complements `/swarm-review` via Codex-CLI. Scopes: code-diff (default), plan-artifact (gate for `/swarm-plan`).