Menu
Get Neo's code review with semantic pattern matching. Focuses on security vulnerabilities, edge cases, error handling, and performance issues across the target file or module.
Install with Codex or Claude Copy this prompt, paste it into Codex, Claude, or another assistant, and let it review the skill page and install it for you.
Based on SOC occupation classification
Get Neo's architectural guidance for design decisions. Trade-off analysis for choices like microservices vs monolith, sync vs async, event-driven vs request-response — with persistent memory of how similar decisions played out.
Ask Neo to help debug intermittent, complex, or hard-to-reproduce issues. Particularly useful for race conditions, memory issues, distributed-systems bugs, and cases where the symptom is not the root cause.
Ask Neo for optimization suggestions on a function, file, or hot path. Targets algorithmic improvements, redundant work, allocation/hot-loop issues — not micro-style.
Ask Neo to extract a reusable pattern from a piece of code, or to find existing patterns in the codebase that match a description. Useful for codifying conventions and finding duplicated logic.
Ask Neo for semantic reasoning and code suggestions over the current codebase. Use for general questions, code suggestions, or architectural guidance backed by Neo's persistent memory.
Sync current branch with base branch. Codex (you) resolves conflicts intelligently, not automated scripts.
| name | neo-review |
| description | Get Neo's code review with semantic pattern matching. Focuses on security vulnerabilities, edge cases, error handling, and performance issues across the target file or module. |
When the user invokes this skill ($neo-review <file or module>), do the following:
Identify the target. It will usually be a file path (e.g. src/api/handlers.py), a module name, or a free-form description ("the payment processing code"). Use Read/Grep/Glob to resolve it to concrete file(s).
Read the relevant code. Up to 5 files at a time keeps Neo's context budget healthy. Prefer the files where the actual logic lives over generated/test files.
Invoke Neo with a review-framed prompt. Allow up to 5 minutes.
neo --mode advise <<'QUERY'
Review the following code for: security vulnerabilities, edge cases, error handling, performance issues. Provide concrete suggestions with confidence scores.
<paste relevant code or summarize what you read>
QUERY
Filter Neo's output to review-relevant findings. Group by severity. Flag any finding with confidence ≥ 0.8 as actionable; treat lower-confidence findings as worth-checking-but-verify.
Cross-reference with Neo's KNOWN ISSUES IN NEARBY CODE section if present. Neo's context-assembly already surfaces TODOs, stubs, swallowed exceptions, hardcoded credentials — those overlap with review concerns and add weight to related findings.