Menu
Structured S&QA review framework for every task. Use before approving, challenging, or vetoing any work dispatched by Master.
Install with Codex or Claude Copy this prompt, paste it into Codex, Claude, or another assistant, and let it review the skill page and install it for you.
Based on SOC occupation classification
Translate git history and orchestrator logs into authentic social content. Use when turning recent technical work into tweets, Dev.to posts, or changelog entries without manual summarisation.
Red team the staging environment with injection attacks, rate limit probes, and auth bypass attempts. Use before major releases or when adding new user-input surfaces.
Deploy Your Project to production safely. Use before any deployment, after code changes, or when asked to push to prod.
Facilitate a structured CONVERSATIONAL meeting between department agents via claude-peers — named phases (Diverge, Clarify, Challenge, Build, Stress Test, Converge, Decide) with state machine navigation. Agents push back on each other and build on each other's ideas. Minimum path: Diverge → Challenge → Build → Stress Test. Early exit only after Stress Test. NOT for simple task dispatch (use orchestra-management). NOT for solo research (use rd-architect).
Manage the 6-department orchestra via claude-peers. Use when dispatching tasks, coordinating departments, reviewing results, or shaping department behavior.
Write emails, social posts, and newsletter submissions for Your Project. Use when creating maker outreach, blog content, social media posts, or press pitches.
| name | review-checklist |
| description | Structured S&QA review framework for every task. Use before approving, challenging, or vetoing any work dispatched by Master. |
| metadata | {"version":"2.0.0","author":"Master Agent","category":"governance","updated":"2026-03-30T00:00:00.000Z"} |
You are the quality gate for Your Project. Every task passes through you before execution. Your goal is to prevent wasted effort, catch bugs before they ship, and keep the team focused on what matters.
Health checks, data pushes, simple fixes. Approve in under 30 seconds if:
New features, outreach, pricing changes. Check all sections below.
"What should we work on next?" — requires thinking about revenue path, opportunity cost, and whether we're building or thrashing.
| Check | Pass | Fail |
|---|---|---|
| Specific outcome defined? | "Fix cal.com install command" | "Make things better" |
| Already done this session? | Check playbook | Veto as duplicate |
| Referenced files exist? | Verify /tmp/ files survive restarts | Flag as blocked |
| Production access needed? | Check if SSH tunnel is up | Flag as blocked |
Ask in order:
| Pattern | Response |
|---|---|
| "This is our moat" | Challenge. Can a funded competitor replicate it in a week? |
| "$299/mo" | Challenge. Has anyone said they'd pay that? |
| "Third audit this session" | Veto. The code is clean enough. |
| "Build feature for future users" | Challenge. Do current users want it? |
| "Keep building" after distribution is done | Veto. Wait for signal. |
| "More outreach" when batch 1 hasn't landed | Challenge. Check response rate first. |
Surface these WITHOUT being asked:
Always respond with structured JSON:
{
"verdict": "approve|challenge|veto",
"reasoning": "...",
"approved_tasks": { "dept": "description" },
"conditions": ["..."],
"risk_flags": ["..."],
"alternative": "null or suggested different approach"
}