code-readability

name	code-readability
description	Make code readable for humans, IDEs, doc generators, and AI at once — by enforcing a TSDoc-native comment standard and turning those comments into GitHub Wiki documentation (cross-linked to the source). Use to assess doc-comment coverage, annotate a file/area with quality docs, or generate + publish project docs. TypeScript/React/MUI first; also covers HTML (semantic/ARIA), CSS/Sass (KSS/SassDoc), and vanilla JS (JSDoc) — see references/comment-style.md.
allowed-tools	Bash(npx:*),Bash(node:*),Bash(git:*),Bash(ssh:*),Read,Write,Edit,Grep,Glob,Task
argument-hint	[assess|annotate|generate|publish|team] [path-or-scope]

Code Readability & Documentation Skill

One well-written comment should satisfy four readers at once:

1. The human skimming the file — a "why-not-what" header that explains intent.
2. The IDE — a TSDoc /** */ block so hover, signature help, and quick-info show the doc inline.
3. The doc generator — react-docgen-typescript (components) and TypeDoc (everything else) read the same TSDoc to build the GitHub Wiki.
4. An AI agent — dense, accurate context at the point of use, so a model can act without re-deriving intent.

This skill enforces that standard and turns it into published docs. It is TypeScript-native: TSDoc, never PropTypes — the types already are the prop contract; PropTypes would duplicate it, drift, and add runtime weight (see references/comment-style.md).

Configure for your project

The skill is project-agnostic; set these knobs once for your repo. The scripts read the listed environment variables (export them, or prefix the command), and a few values flow in as CLI args.

Knob	How to set	Default
Source globs / dirs to scan	pass as scope/path args (e.g. src/components, or a glob to extract-docs.mjs)	src/**/*.{ts,tsx}
tsconfig for doc extraction	CR_TSCONFIG env (or --tsconfig on extract-docs.mjs)	tsconfig.json
Drizzle schema path (schema-page generator)	CR_SCHEMA env	src/db/schema.ts
Team-page facts (team mode: package.json / env / stack roots)	CR_PKG, CR_ENV_EXAMPLE, CR_REPO_ROOT env	package.json, .env.example, .
GitHub repo + blob base URL (for linkify)	passed as args to linkify-wiki.mjs (<repo-root> <wiki-dir> https://github.com/<owner>/<repo>/blob/<branch>)	—
Domain concepts / terms to cross-link in prose	list your own project's terms (the model uses them as wiki cross-link targets)	—

The worked examples below are illustrative, not requirements. They are drawn from the reference project this skill was built in — a residential-care menu app with a "Bill of Materials" food model — so the sample TSDoc, table names, and wiki page names reflect that domain. Substitute your own domain throughout: your symbols, your invariants, your schema, your architecture concepts.

Modes

Invocation	What it does	Edits code?
assess [path]	Score doc-comment coverage + readability/IDE-affordance gaps; rank the worst files. Default.	No
annotate <path>	Add/upgrade TSDoc + readability structure on the target. The only code-editing mode; always scoped to an explicit path.	Yes (comments/format only)
generate [scope]	Hybrid extract → Markdown into /tmp/cr-docs/ for review.	No
publish [scope]	generate, then push the pages to the GitHub Wiki.	No (writes the wiki repo)
team [scaffold|stamp]	Maintain the Team pages (Getting-Started + Skill-Inventory): scaffold them, fill the prose, and stamp the repo-derived fact-blocks. For humans, not code symbols.	No (writes the wiki repo)

scope/path defaults to the changed files on the branch (git diff --name-only origin/HEAD...) so the skill rides the current work; pass a directory under <your source dirs> (e.g. src/components) to target an area, or all for a full pass.

Hard invariant for every mode that edits: comments and formatting only. Never change runtime behavior, identifiers, or control flow. After annotate, npm run lint && npm run type-check && npm test must stay green and the non-comment diff must be empty (git diff -G'^[^/ ]' --stat shows only whitespace/comment churn).

---

Phase 1 — Assess

Goal: a coverage scorecard + a ranked worklist, not a lecture.

1. Resolve scope → list of .ts/.tsx files (exclude *.test.*, *.spec.*, generated, dist/).

2. Enumerate exported symbols per file (components, hooks, functions, const values, type/interface). A symbol is documented when an immediately-preceding /** */ block exists; a component prop is documented when its type member has a /** */.

3. Score each area (components / hooks / lib / api / database):

   Metric	Target
   Exported symbols with a TSDoc summary	≥ 90%
   Component props with a /** */ description	≥ 90%
   Public components/hooks with an @example	100% of "API surface" symbols
   Modules with a file-header comment (intent)	100% of non-trivial modules
   Non-obvious logic blocks with a "why" comment	sampled, qualitative

4. Rank hotspots by (exported symbols) × (1 − coverage) — the files where missing docs cost the most. Surface the top ~10 with the specific gaps.

Report format:

## Readability assessment — <scope>
| Area | Symbols | TSDoc % | Props % | @example | Header % |
|------|--------:|--------:|--------:|---------:|---------:|
| components | 41 | 72% | 64% | 6/14 | 88% |
...
### Top gaps
1. components/RecipeIngredientsTable.tsx — 9 exported symbols, 3 documented; no @example on the table; SortableRow props undocumented → `annotate` candidate

Provide a Grep/Glob recipe so it's reproducible; do not hand-wave the numbers.

---

Phase 2 — Annotate

Apply the standard in references/comment-style.md to the target. Work file-by-file; for each exported symbol add or upgrade:

• Components → summary (what it renders + when to use) · per-prop /** */ · @example showing real usage · @remarks for gotchas. Put the summary directly above the component, not above its Props interface — react-docgen-typescript reads the description from the component's own JSDoc and drops one placed on the type. react-docgen-typescript turns these into the component's Wiki page verbatim.
• Hooks → summary · @param for each arg · @returns describing the returned object's shape (document each returned field) · @example.
• Functions → summary · @param · @returns · @example when non-trivial · @throws if it can reject/throw meaningfully.
• Types / interfaces → summary · per-member /** */.
• Modules → a top-of-file block stating the module's job and how its pieces fit (keep/upgrade the existing "why-not-what" style).

Rules:

• Preserve existing intent comments — upgrade, don't delete the hard-won "why" notes the codebase already has.
• Match the file's surrounding voice and density. Honor any project conventions in CLAUDE.md/AGENTS.md (e.g. a "no em dashes" prose rule may apply to user-facing copy but not code comments — match the file you're in).
• Document the why and the contract, not the obvious mechanics. // increments i is noise; /** Cycles asc → desc → off; null falls back to default order. */ is signal.
• Behavior-preserving. Re-run lint/type-check/test before declaring done.

---

Phase 3 — Generate (hybrid: tools + prose)

Deterministic structure from the tools, narrative from the model. Both layers read the same TSDoc, so prose and tables can't drift from the code.

Tool layer (references/doc-generation.md has exact commands):

• Components → scripts/extract-docs.mjs (wraps react-docgen-typescript) → JSON of { displayName, description, props[], tags }, then a Markdown props table per component.
• Hooks / lib / api / database → npx typedoc --plugin typedoc-plugin-markdown → Markdown.

Prose layer (the model, per area):

• A narrative overview (what this area is for, the mental model, how the pieces compose) above the generated tables.
• Usage examples drawn from real call sites (grep the repo for actual usages, don't invent).
• Cross-links between related symbols (e.g. [[Reference-Hooks#useMyHook]]) and to your project's architecture concepts — the domain terms you listed in "Configure for your project" (in the reference project these were BOM, resident portioning, and computed views; substitute your own, drawn from CLAUDE.md/AGENTS.md).
• An "AI context" callout per page: the 2–3 facts a model most needs to use this correctly (invariants, gotchas, where the source of truth lives).

Assemble into pages under /tmp/cr-docs/ and show the user the index + one sample page before publishing.

---

Phase 4 — Publish to the GitHub Wiki

Reuse the repo's /github-wiki wiki flow (SSH push to <repo>.wiki.git, single master branch, no PRs). Do not invent new auth.

1. Resolve the wiki SSH URL: take the repo origin, swap .git → .wiki.git, ensure [e-mail]: form. Verify ssh -T [e-mail].
2. Clone (or git pull an existing clone) into a temp dir.
3. Write the generated pages following the GitHub Wiki Markdown conventions in references/doc-generation.md (Gollum, not README markdown): Diátaxis separation (generated = Reference only; keep explanation in Architecture.md; never generate tutorials over hand-authored pages), [[Page#anchor]] wiki links, hyphenated page names (spaces and / both collapse to -), a manual "Jump to" anchor-link TOC on long pages (GitHub wiki ignores [[_TOC_]]), plain blockquotes for callouts (> [!NOTE] alerts are unreliable in wikis), Mermaid for diagrams. Suggested page set (hyphen-prefixed so they group in the sidebar):
   • Home.md — what the app is + a documentation index (link every page).
   • Architecture.md — your project's core domain model + key concepts + deployment (distil from CLAUDE.md/AGENTS.md, don't copy verbatim); include a Mermaid diagram. (In the reference project this covered the BOM model, resident portioning, and computed views — substitute your own concepts.)
   • Reference-Components.md (or per-area, e.g. Reference-Components-<Area>.md) — react-docgen output + prose.
   • Reference-Hooks.md, Reference-API.md, Reference-Lib.md, Database-Schema.md.
   • Page-Anatomy.md — how each screen works end-to-end: a shared-loop flowchart + per-UI Mermaid sequence diagrams of the UI→hook→API→ORM→DB round trip, with file links and "where to make changes". The Diátaxis explanation complement to the reference pages; highest-leverage for onboarding/throughput. Trace each screen from real code (see references/doc-generation.md → "Page Anatomy").
   • Team pages (Diátaxis how-to + explanation, for humans not code) — Getting-Started.md (fresh-clone → running localhost) and Skill-Inventory.md (the competency matrix a teammate needs). Unlike the Reference pages, these are hand-authored prose with stamped fact-blocks: writes a starter page, you fill the prose, and re-running it (no flag) regenerates only the markers from + so commands, env vars, and stack versions never drift. Run it on every publish (before ), the same way keeps the dashboard current. See → "Team pages".

---

Phase 5 — Team pages (team mode)

The Reference / Page-Anatomy pages document the code; the Team pages document the team — written for humans, not extracted from symbols. Two pages, both hand-authored prose with repo-stamped fact-blocks (the inverse of the generated reference pages):

• Getting-Started.md (Diátaxis how-to) — fresh git clone → running localhost: prerequisites, env config, dev commands, troubleshooting.
• Skill-Inventory.md (Diátaxis explanation) — a competency matrix (technology, design patterns, database, frontend, Agile/delivery) with proficiency targets (Aware / Working / Fluent) and "learn from" links into the repo + wiki.

scripts/gen-team-pages.mjs owns four marker regions — the same stamp mechanism as the CodeHealth badge — so the factual bits can't drift:

Marker	Source	Page
<!--cr:prereqs-->	engines.node / .nvmrc + packageManager	Getting-Started
<!--cr:env-->	parsed .env.example (var · example · grouping comment)	Getting-Started
<!--cr:scripts-->	every npm run target in the root package.json	Getting-Started
<!--cr:stack-->	signal deps + versions scanned across all package.json	Skill-Inventory

Sub-modes:

• team scaffold — first-time setup. Resolve + clone the wiki (Phase 4 step 1–2), then node scripts/gen-team-pages.mjs <wiki> --scaffold writes starter pages (prose template + markers) for any that don't exist and stamps the fact-blocks. Then fill the <!-- TODO --> prose from the project: the accounts/services a dev needs, the run command + ports, the real troubleshooting list, and the matrix rows (pull design-patterns from CLAUDE.md/AGENTS.md, DB skills from the schema, frontend from the component library, Agile from the project board). Add the pages to _Sidebar.md + Home.md under a Team group, linkify, and publish (Phase 4 step 5–7).
• team stamp (default for team) — refresh only. node scripts/gen-team-pages.mjs <wiki> regenerates the four marker regions in the existing pages and leaves prose untouched (idempotent). Run it before linkify-wiki on every publish, and wire it into the same weekly job that stamps CodeHealth so onboarding never lists a command that no longer exists.

Drift model: facts are stamped from the repo (auto-fresh); prose is hand-maintained (reviewed when the stack or architecture changes). Config knobs: CR_PKG, CR_ENV_EXAMPLE, CR_REPO_ROOT (all default to repo root). .gitignore'd .claude/? Commit a copy of gen-team-pages.mjs into the repo's tracked scripts/ so CI can run it (see "Configure for your project").

---

TSDoc standard (summary — full guide in references/comment-style.md)

• Every exported symbol gets a /** */ summary. First sentence is a noun-phrase that stands alone in an autocomplete popup.
• Props/fields are documented on the type member, not in the summary — that's what react-docgen-typescript and IDE quick-info surface.
• Use the tags that add value: @param, @returns, @example, @remarks, @see, @throws, @defaultValue, @deprecated. Skip ceremony tags that restate the signature.
• @example blocks are fenced ```tsx and must compile in spirit (real prop names, real imports).
• Keep the codebase's "why-not-what" block comments for non-obvious logic — they are the highest-value comments and AI's best context. TSDoc complements them; it doesn't replace them.
• Never add prop-types / PropTypes. In TS the interface is the contract; document it with TSDoc.

---

Quality rubric (gate before declaring a file done)

• Every exported symbol has a TSDoc summary that reads well in an IDE hover.
• Every component prop / type field has a one-line description.
• Public components & hooks have a real, copy-pasteable @example.
• Non-obvious logic has a "why" comment; obvious mechanics are not over-commented.
• Comments state intent + invariants + gotchas (the AI-context test: could a model use this correctly from the comment alone?).
• lint, type-check, test green; non-comment diff empty.

Don'ts

• No PropTypes (TS project).
• No behavior changes, renames, or reordering under the banner of "readability".
• No restating the obvious (// the name over name).
• No overwriting hand-authored Wiki pages (marker check).
• Don't invent examples — pull from real call sites.

Files

File	Purpose
SKILL.md	This file — modes + workflow
references/comment-style.md	The TSDoc house style: rules + good/bad examples
references/doc-generation.md	Hybrid pipeline: tool commands, page layout, wiki publish
scripts/extract-docs.mjs	react-docgen-typescript → component-doc JSON/Markdown
scripts/wiki-slug.mjs	Canonical GitHub heading-anchor slug (ghSlug) — use for every [text](#anchor) link
scripts/gen-schema-page.mjs	Generate the Database-Schema wiki page from schema.ts (table TSDoc + parsed columns)
scripts/gen-team-pages.mjs	Scaffold + stamp the Team pages (Getting-Started, Skill-Inventory): regenerates the cr: fact-blocks (prereqs, scripts, env, stack) from package.json + .env.example
scripts/linkify-wiki.mjs	Cross-reference wiki pages → link backtick file mentions to source on GitHub (publish step)
README.md	Overview + setup