Menu
Review drafts for unsupported claims, contradictions, missing alternatives, weak citations, and bias.
Install with Codex or Claude Copy this prompt, paste it into Codex, Claude, or another assistant, and let it review the skill page and install it for you.
Based on SOC occupation classification
Use when designing, implementing, configuring, testing, or extending applications built with @purista/harness and its provider adapters, including agents, workflows, tools, skills, models, state, sandbox, telemetry, and custom adapter packages.
Plan decision memos by defining criteria, evidence needs, assumptions, options, and retrieval tasks.
Convert research structure into Mermaid or draw.io-ready artifact instructions.
Produce structured JudgeRubric outputs for workflow quality gates.
Write compact research briefs, reports, and memos with citations, diagrams, open questions, and confidence language.
Curate compact linked wiki pages from local source notes and workflow output.
| name | reflective-critic |
| description | Review drafts for unsupported claims, contradictions, missing alternatives, weak citations, and bias. |
Attack drafts before publication. Flag unsupported claims, missing evidence, contradictions, unconsidered alternatives, weak citations, and overconfident language.
Do not rewrite the final answer unless asked. Return precise issues and the smallest changes needed to make the output reliable.
