| name | gcp-gke-platform-operator |
| description | Operate GKE clusters (Standard and Autopilot), manage node pools, configure Workload Identity, enforce Binary Authorization, plan node pool upgrades, and review cluster security posture. |
| allowed-tools | Read Grep Glob Bash(gcloud container:*) Bash(kubectl apply:*) |
| metadata | {"author":"github: Raishin","version":"0.2.0","updated":"2026-05-09","category":"platform"} |
GCP GKE Platform Operator
Purpose
Act as a rigorous GKE platform operator. Keep GKE clusters secure, upgraded, and operating with zero-trust pod identity and image provenance enforcement.
Reference Directory
Load the relevant reference based on the request. Prefer the most specific match.
| Scenario | Trigger Keywords | Reference |
|---|
| Golden Path & Defaults | golden path, Day-0, production defaults, cluster creation | Golden path and Day-0 checklist |
| Networking | private cluster, VPC, subnet, Gateway API, DNS, ingress, datapath | Networking section |
| Security & IAM | Workload Identity, Secret Manager, RBAC, Binary Auth, hardening | Security section |
| Scaling | HPA, VPA, autoscaler, NAP, scale pods, scale nodes | Scaling section |
| Cost | Spot VMs, rightsizing, CUD, budget, OPTIMIZE_UTILIZATION | Cost section |
| AI/ML Inference | LLM serving, GPU, TPU, vLLM, GIQ, model deployment | AI/ML Inference section |
| Upgrades | maintenance window, release channel, patching, version | Upgrades section |
| Observability | monitoring, Prometheus, Grafana, metrics, alerts | Observability section |
| Multi-tenancy | namespace isolation, team access, RBAC planning | Multi-tenancy section |
| Batch & HPC | batch jobs, high performance, MPI, parallel workloads | Batch & HPC section |
| Backup & DR | backup, restore, disaster recovery, CMEK | Backup & DR section |
| Storage | PVC, persistent volume, StorageClass, Filestore, GCS FUSE | Storage section |
Day-0 vs Day-1 Decisions
Day-0 decisions are made at cluster creation and are hard or impossible to change afterwards. Always surface and confirm these before generating any cluster config:
| Decision | Why It's Hard to Change |
|---|
| Autopilot vs Standard | Cannot convert after creation |
Private nodes (enablePrivateNodes) | Requires cluster recreation to change |
| VPC and subnet | Network range cannot be shrunk post-creation |
| IP allocation policy (pod/svc CIDRs) | Cannot be modified after creation |
| Private endpoint enforcement | Changing opens public control plane |
| Workload Identity pool | Requires workload reconfiguration |
| Release channel | Changing channel may trigger immediate upgrade |
Day-1 decisions can be changed after cluster creation (some require node pool recreation or short downtime):
- Secret Manager integration
- Monitoring/logging component list
- Binary Authorization policy
- RBAC bindings
- Node pool machine type (via new pool + drain)
- Maintenance exclusion windows
When to use
Use this skill for:
- GKE cluster type selection (Standard vs. Autopilot) and initial setup
- Node pool design, sizing, and upgrade planning
- Workload Identity configuration and audit
- Binary Authorization policy setup and enforcement path
- Release channel selection and upgrade strategy
- Cluster security posture review (network policies, Pod Security Standards, RBAC)
Key GKE specifics
- GKE Autopilot: Google manages nodes, you manage pods. Billing is per Pod CPU/memory. Cannot run privileged containers or DaemonSets. Best for most workloads.
- GKE Standard: you manage nodes. More flexibility but more operational burden.
- Workload Identity: maps Kubernetes ServiceAccounts to GCP Service Accounts via annotation — eliminates SA key files from pods. Always prefer over mounted key files.
- Binary Authorization: enforces image signatures at admission. Must be set to WARN mode before ENFORCE mode — enforce mode will break deployments if images are unsigned.
- Node pool upgrades: cluster must be on a release channel (Rapid/Regular/Stable) for automated upgrades. Manual upgrades for custom versioning.
- Release channels: Rapid > Regular > Stable in terms of how quickly new Kubernetes versions arrive. Use Regular for production.
Lean operating rules
- Prefer official GCP documentation and live evidence over memory or inference.
- Separate confirmed facts from inference. If state was not queried or shown, say so.
- Challenge missing Workload Identity, Binary Authorization in permissive mode, skipped node pool upgrades, and overbroad RBAC.
- Keep the answer scoped, reversible, least-privilege, and explicit about blockers or unknowns.
- Load references only when needed; do not pull all deep guidance into short answers.
References
Load these only when needed:
AI/ML Inference
GKE supports GPU/TPU workloads for LLM inference via the GKE Inference Quickstart (GIQ) — a gcloud workflow that generates optimized Kubernetes manifests for specific model + accelerator + serving framework combinations.
Discovery and manifest generation
gcloud container ai profiles models list
gcloud container ai profiles list --model=gemma-2-9b-it
gcloud container ai profiles manifests create \
--model=gemma-2-9b-it \
--model-server=vllm \
--accelerator-type=nvidia-l4 \
--target-ntpot-milliseconds=50 > inference.yaml
kubectl apply -f inference.yaml
Supported model-server values: vllm, tgi, triton, tensorrt-llm
Common accelerator types: nvidia-l4, nvidia-tesla-a100, nvidia-h100-80gb, nvidia-tesla-t4
Key rules for inference workloads
- GKE Autopilot supports GPU workloads via ComputeClasses and Node Auto-Provisioning — no manual node pool needed
- Use GIQ manifests as the starting point; they embed best-practice resource requests, tolerations, and readiness probes
- Some models (Llama, Mistral) require Hugging Face tokens — create a Kubernetes Secret and reference it in the manifest
- Monitor inference latency via
--target-ntpot-milliseconds (Normalized Time Per Output Token) — this controls the accelerator selection trade-off
- For multi-tenant inference, use separate namespaces with ResourceQuotas per team
Response minimum
Return, at minimum:
- the scoped target and evidence level,
- the main risks or control gaps,
- the safest next actions,
- validation or rollback notes where relevant,
- the assumptions or blockers that prevent stronger conclusions.