coordinate-subagents

name	coordinate-subagents
description	Advanced subagent troubleshooting. Use when subagent calls fail, return bad output, or need voting for critical decisions.
tools	["Task"]

Subagent Troubleshooting & Advanced Patterns

Core coordination patterns are in CLAUDE.md <subagent_coordination>. This skill covers edge cases.

---

When to Load This Skill

• Subagent returned malformed output twice
• Need voting pattern for critical/irreversible decision
• Debugging why coordination isn't working
• Learning TOON format syntax details

---

Voting for Critical Decisions

For irreversible actions (deletions, deployments, security assessments), run same query 2-3 times in parallel:

<!-- 3 parallel agents, same question -->
<invoke name="Task">
  <parameter name="subagent_type">Explore</parameter>
  <parameter name="model">haiku</parameter>
  <parameter name="prompt">@type: AssessAction about: "safe to delete auth_old.ts" ...</parameter>
</invoke>
<invoke name="Task">
  <parameter name="subagent_type">Explore</parameter>
  <parameter name="model">haiku</parameter>
  <parameter name="prompt">@type: AssessAction about: "safe to delete auth_old.ts" ...</parameter>
</invoke>
<invoke name="Task">
  <parameter name="subagent_type">Explore</parameter>
  <parameter name="model">haiku</parameter>
  <parameter name="prompt">@type: AssessAction about: "safe to delete auth_old.ts" ...</parameter>
</invoke>

Interpret results:

• 3 agree → proceed confidently
• 2 agree → proceed with caution, note dissent
• All differ → query is ambiguous, refine and retry

---

Red-Flag Recovery

Symptom	Action
Output exceeds budget by >30%	Discard entirely, retry same prompt
Wrong format (expected TOON, got prose)	Discard, retry with stricter instruction
2 consecutive failures	Refine query OR escalate model (haiku→sonnet)
Contradictory answers across retries	Query is ambiguous, decompose further

Never: Try to parse/repair confused output. Discard and retry.

---

TOON Format Reference

Token-Oriented Object Notation. Use for uniform arrays (file lists, steps, configs).

Basic Syntax

# Array with header declaring fields
items[N]{field1,field2,field3}:
  value1,value2,value3
  value1,value2,value3

Escaping

• Commas in values: wrap in quotes "value, with comma"
• Quotes in values: escape \"nested quote\"
• Newlines: use \n

Examples

File list:

files[3]{path,purpose,lines}:
  src/auth/login.ts,Main login handler,145
  src/auth/session.ts,Session management,89
  src/auth/token.ts,JWT utilities,67

Process steps:

steps[4]{position,action,file}:
  1,Parse request body,src/middleware/parser.ts
  2,Validate auth token,src/middleware/auth.ts
  3,Check permissions,src/middleware/rbac.ts
  4,Execute handler,src/routes/api.ts

Key-value config:

config[3]{key,value}:
  maxTokens,1500
  format,toon
  itemLimit,10

---

Anti-Patterns Checklist

If coordination isn't working, check for these:

Anti-Pattern	Fix
Single agent doing multiple tasks	Split: one task per agent
No token budget specified	Add @constraints: maxTokens: N
Using opus for simple search	Downgrade to haiku
Full conversation history in prompt	Strip to goal + constraints only
Sequential independent calls	Parallelize in one message
Parsing broken output	Discard and retry instead
Asking to "explain" or "describe"	Request structured format
Direct MCP/web tool calls in main context	Delegate: payloads unpredictable, request TOON summary
Verifying N external sources inline	Delegate: N scrapes = N×2000 tokens wasted

---

Decomposition Examples

Bad: Compound task

Find authentication code and analyze security vulnerabilities and suggest fixes

Good: Three focused agents

Agent 1: Find authentication code (haiku, 1500 tokens)
Agent 2: Analyze security of [files from agent 1] (sonnet, 2000 tokens)
Agent 3: Suggest fixes for [issues from agent 2] (sonnet, 2000 tokens)

Note: Agent 2 depends on Agent 1, so run sequentially. But if you had 3 independent searches, run all in parallel.

---

Quick Diagnostics

Subagent returned garbage
├─ Was format specified? → Add explicit TOON/JSON instruction
├─ Was budget set? → Add @constraints maxTokens
├─ Was task atomic? → Check for "and", split if needed
├─ Right model? → Simple task shouldn't use opus
└─ Second failure? → Escalate model or refine query

---

External Data Operations

MCP tools and web scrapes are context pollution hazards:

Tool	Typical Payload	Risk
firecrawl_scrape	500-5000 tokens	High - full page content
firecrawl_search	200-1000 tokens	Medium - result snippets
WebFetch	500-3000 tokens	High - full page content

Rule: Any task involving N external fetches should be delegated with:

• Token budget: min(N × 200, 2500) tokens for summary output
• Format: TOON for uniform results, JSON for complex analysis
• Scrape options: onlyMainContent: true, formats: ["markdown"]

Example - URL verification:

Task(Explore, sonnet):
  "Verify these 10 legislation URLs. For each, scrape with onlyMainContent:true,
   confirm HTTP 200, identify managing authority from page content.

   @return ItemList in TOON:
   results[10]{jurisdiction,url,status,authority}:
     Commonwealth,https://legislation.gov.au,valid,Office of Parliamentary Counsel
     ...

   @constraints: maxTokens: 2000"

---

Reference

• Core patterns: CLAUDE.md <subagent_coordination>
• TOON format details: references/toon-format.md
• Source: "Solving a Million-Step LLM Task with Zero Errors" (arxiv:2511.09030)