Menu
Verify supplied review feedback and apply only accepted in-scope fixes.
Install with Codex or Claude Copy this prompt, paste it into Codex, Claude, or another assistant, and let it review the skill page and install it for you.
Based on SOC occupation classification
Use when a GitHub Pull Request has unresolved review threads, pending reviews, stale/outdated threads, local findings ingestion, or needs mandatory final-gate proof in one PR-scoped session.
Optional after-specify refinement gate. Bridges an installed obra/superpowers brainstorming skill into the active Spec Kit spec.md without creating a second design document or replacing speckit.specify.
Diagnose the five Superpowers disciplines used by Superb and report the focused hook and standalone-command contract.
Read-only implementation critique against active Spec Kit artifacts.
Apply systematic root-cause investigation to the current failing task.
Complete branch handoff after Spec Kit convergence and fresh checks.
| name | speckit-superb-respond |
| description | Verify supplied review feedback and apply only accepted in-scope fixes. |
| compatibility | Requires spec-kit project structure with .specify/ directory |
| metadata | {"author":"github-spec-kit","source":"superb:commands/respond.md"} |
$ARGUMENTS
Resolve receiving-code-review. For each supplied finding, verify it against
the active Spec Kit artifacts and code, then classify it as accepted, rejected,
or requiring clarification.
If feedback changes requirement meaning, architecture, or task scope, stop code
changes and route to the earliest owning Spec Kit command: speckit.clarify,
speckit.plan, or speckit.tasks. Apply accepted in-scope fixes test-first and
report fresh evidence. Do not invent findings, broaden scope, or mark completion.
If the skill is unavailable, run
bash .specify/extensions/superb/scripts/bash/ensure-skills.sh --print-guidance
and direct the user to /speckit.superb.check; do not apply feedback blindly.