rc-revenuecat-vs-raw-billing

name	rc-revenuecat-vs-raw-billing
description	Use this skill to decide whether to use RevenueCat or raw Google Play Billing on Android. Provides a side by side reference of what RevenueCat handles versus what remains your responsibility at both client and backend layers.
license	Apache-2.0; see LICENSE
metadata	{"author":"RevenueCat","source":"revenuecat-handbook appendix B","keywords":["android","revenuecat","comparison","decision","raw-billing"]}

RevenueCat vs Raw Google Play Billing

Phase 0: Intent

Use this skill when you are choosing between integrating RevenueCat or wiring Google Play Billing Library (PBL) directly, and you need to see which concerns disappear, which shift, and which still land on your team. The decision covers both the Android client and any server side infrastructure that supports subscriptions or one time purchases.

Typical questions this skill answers:

• If I adopt RevenueCat, what client code no longer exists in my app?
• What backend pieces (receipt verification, RTDN, state machine) does RevenueCat replace?
• What do I still own regardless of which path I pick?
• Is there a concern where raw PBL is the only option today?

Phase 1: Locate the Concern

Before reading the tables, identify what you are actually evaluating. Sort your requirement into one of these buckets and jump to the matching section:

Bucket	Examples	Go to
Client purchase plumbing	BillingClient, listeners, acknowledgement, consumption	Client side table
Server purchase truth	Token validation, RTDN, entitlement state machine	Server side table
Out of scope for either	Auth, your user DB, paywall UI, push	Your responsibility table

If the concern is split (for example, RevenueCat verifies the token but you still need to gate premium content on your API), you own the integration glue even though the verification itself is handled.

Phase 2: Side by Side Reference

Client side

Concern	Raw PBL	RevenueCat
BillingClient setup and configuration	You write	Handled internally
Connection lifecycle and reconnection	You write	Handled internally
PurchasesUpdatedListener	You write	Replaced by purchase callbacks
queryProductDetailsAsync()	You write	Replaced by awaitOfferings() / awaitGetProducts()
launchBillingFlow()	You write	Called internally by awaitPurchase()
Acknowledgement after purchase	You write	Handled automatically
Consumption of consumables	You write	Handled automatically (mark product as consumable in dashboard)
queryPurchasesAsync() on launch	You write	Handled internally on connection
Retry logic for transient errors	You write	Handled internally by SDK
BillingResponseCode handling	You write	Abstracted to PurchasesErrorCode
In-app payment recovery messages	You write	Automatic (showInAppMessagesAutomatically = true)
Subscription option selection for offers	You write	defaultOption selected automatically

Server side

Concern	Raw PBL	RevenueCat
Google Play Developer API integration	You build	RevenueCat backend
Service account credential management	You manage	Configured once in RC dashboard
Receipt verification on every purchase	You build	Automatic
Purchase token validation and deduplication	You build	RevenueCat backend
linkedPurchaseToken chain traversal	You build	RevenueCat backend
RTDN processing and dispatch	You build	RevenueCat processes, sends webhooks
Cloud Pub/Sub setup	You set up	Not needed
Subscription state machine on backend	You build	CustomerInfo computed by RC
Entitlement computation across 7 states	You build	isActive computed by RC
Grace period / account hold tracking	You build	billingIssueDetectedAt
Cancellation with access-until-expiry logic	You build	isActive + unsubscribeDetectedAt
Price cohort tracking	You build	RC backend handles
Product-to-entitlement mapping	You build	Configured in RC dashboard

What remains your responsibility either way

Concern	Notes
User authentication system	You bring your own; pass user ID to RC
Your own database of users	RC is not your primary user database
Premium content server side	Verify via RC REST API or webhooks
Webhook receiver endpoint	You build; RC sends, you receive
Play Console product creation	Still done in Play Console
Subscription deferral	Direct Google Play API call
Subscription revocation	Direct Google Play API call
Alternative billing programs	Limited RC support; may need raw PBL
App UI (paywalls, onboarding)	You build (RC Paywalls UI optional)
Push notifications for payment issues	You build on top of webhook events

Phase 3: Recommendation Heuristic

Use these rules to convert the tables into a decision:

1. If your app needs subscription deferral, subscription revocation, or an alternative billing program that RevenueCat does not yet cover, plan to keep a raw PBL path for those specific calls regardless of your main choice.
2. If you would otherwise build a receipt verification service, an RTDN pipeline, and a subscription state machine from scratch, the server side table lists at least eight concerns that RevenueCat removes. Choose RevenueCat unless you have a concrete reason to own that stack.
3. If you already have a mature billing backend with verified tokens and tested state handling, the gain is smaller. Weigh it against RevenueCat's client side simplifications and dashboard driven catalog.
4. Always confirm the "remains your responsibility" row items are staffed. RevenueCat does not replace your auth, your user database, your paywall UI, or your premium content gate. Passing appUserID and verifying entitlements server side via the REST API or webhooks is still on you.
5. When in doubt, map every requirement to a row in one of the three tables. Anything that lands in the "remains your responsibility" table costs the same under either option and should not drive the decision.

Quick gate:

need custom RTDN pipeline?      -> raw PBL only if you must own it end to end
need deferral or revocation?    -> keep a raw PBL path for those API calls
need fast time to production?   -> RevenueCat, then add raw PBL escape hatches later

References

• Full chapter