flutter-integration-tests

name	flutter-integration-tests
description	Author reliable Flutter integration tests that run with `flutter test -d flutter-tester`, especially in apps using GetX navigation and rinf-style async bridges. Use this when creating or editing `integration_test/*.dart` and avoiding deadlocks matters. [skill-hash:9c7d2f1]

Flutter Integration Tests

Use this skill when authoring or editing integration_test/*.dart for Flutter apps that:

• run tests with flutter test, not flutter drive
• use flutter-tester
• use GetX navigation
• have async app/bootstrap work, bridge/runtime initialization, or long-lived background activity

Run Pattern

Run a single integration test file with:

flutter test \
  --dart-define=TEST_BASE_URL=http://localhost:<PORT> \
  -d flutter-tester \
  integration_test/<test_file>.dart

Rules:

• Prefer --dart-define=... over prefixing the command with env vars.
• Prefer one test file at a time while authoring.
• Match the repo's actual define names if they differ from TEST_BASE_URL.

Core Model

Keep three categories separate:

1. External async work

• login through repos/APIs
• bridge/runtime initialization
• connection/bootstrap configuration
• data seeding

2. UI-driving work

• Get.toNamed(...)
• route helpers like goToRoute(...)
• tester.tap(...)
• tester.enterText(...)
• tester.drag(...)
• tester.pump(...)

3. Observation

• bounded waits for route, widget, text, or controller/store state

Most deadlocks happen when category 2 is awaited like category 1.

Hard Rules

Do not await route pushes

Do not await Get.toNamed(...) or a route helper that forwards that future unless the test explicitly needs the pop result.

Bad:

await goToRoute(AppRoutes.settings);

Good:

goToRoute(AppRoutes.settings);
await tester.pump();
await _pumpUntil(
  tester,
  condition: () => Get.currentRoute == AppRoutes.settings,
  timeout: const Duration(seconds: 2),
  reason: 'settings route did not open',
);

Why:

• Get.toNamed(...) resolves when the pushed route is popped, not when it appears.

Do not put UI navigation in tester.runAsync(...)

Use tester.runAsync(...) only for external async work that does not depend on pumping frames.

Good uses:

• auth/login helpers
• repo/API calls
• bridge/runtime calls
• seeding

Bad uses:

• navigation
• taps
• text entry
• scrolling
• widget waits

Prefer bounded waits over pumpAndSettle()

Use explicit bounded waits for:

• current route
• widget presence
• text presence
• controller/store values

Avoid defaulting to pumpAndSettle() in apps with:

• streams
• timers
• shell/bootstrap activity
• bridge-driven updates

Safe Patterns

External async first, then UI

await tester.runAsync(() async {
  await ensureBridgeInitialized();
  await configureConnectionSettings();
  await loginAsTestUser();
});

await tester.pumpWidget(const MyApp());
await tester.pump();

Safe navigation

goToRoute(detailRoute);
await tester.pump();

await _pumpUntil(
  tester,
  condition: () => Get.currentRoute == detailRoute,
  timeout: const Duration(seconds: 2),
  reason: 'detail route did not open',
);

Safe UI action

await tester.tap(find.text('Save'));
await tester.pump();

await _pumpUntil(
  tester,
  condition: () => find.text('Saved').evaluate().isNotEmpty,
  timeout: const Duration(seconds: 2),
  reason: 'save confirmation did not appear',
);

Safe async future that still needs pumping

If a future may only complete while the app keeps processing frames, use a helper that pumps while waiting, such as the repo's pumpUntilDone(...) / pumpUntilValue(...) style helpers.

GetX Navigation Guidance

If the repo has helpers like goToRoute(...), inspect what they return.

If they forward Get.toNamed(...), treat them as push-result futures:

• call them
• do not await them for arrival
• pump once
• wait on route/UI state instead

Only await them when asserting the pop result.

rinf / Bridge Guidance

For apps with rinf-style runtime setup:

• initialize the runtime before pumping the app if the app depends on it
• configure connection settings before login/bootstrap
• use the repo's existing harness helpers instead of inventing new bootstrap code
• if the repo already has helpers that pump while bridge work completes, prefer those

If a future depends on bridge messages or UI-driven listeners, a naked await may deadlock. Use a helper that keeps pumping the test loop.

If signals change, rinf gen needs to run in order to generate the bindings. These must be committed to source control if they change.

Changes to rust code require cargo build inside the <flutter project root>/native/hub before running tests so the

Setup / Teardown

Reset state aggressively between tests.

Typical expectations:

• clear auth/session state in setUp
• Get.reset() in setUp or tearDown as the repo pattern requires
• dispose app scope / controllers / subscriptions created by the test
• finalize or reset bridge/runtime state if the repo requires it

Attach cleanup close to allocation with addTearDown(...) when the test creates one-off controllers or scopes.

Common Deadlock Smells

If a test hangs, check these first:

1. await goToRoute(...) or await Get.toNamed(...)
2. navigation inside tester.runAsync(...)
3. naked await on a future that needs pumping to complete
4. pumpAndSettle() on a screen with ongoing timers/streams
5. leaked GetX or bridge state from a previous test

Authoring Checklist

• Use flutter test -d flutter-tester, not flutter drive.
• Use --dart-define=... instead of prefixing env vars.
• Keep external async inside tester.runAsync(...).
• Keep navigation and widget interaction outside tester.runAsync(...).
• Do not await route-push futures unless asserting the pop result.
• Pump once after each major UI trigger.
• Use bounded waits for route/widget/text/state.
• Reset auth/GetX/bridge state according to repo harness rules.
• Prefer existing harness helpers over ad hoc waits.

Minimal Review Heuristic

Before finishing a new integration test, scan for:

• await goToRoute(
• await Get.toNamed(
• tester.runAsync(() async { ... navigation ... })
• unbounded pumpAndSettle() in shell/bootstrap-heavy flows

If any of those are present, the test likely needs restructuring.